Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPoll shows many would not support a war to protect a NATO ally
The Pew Research Center has just released a monster piece of research on public attitudes toward NATO, Ukraine, and Russia.
Fears of Russian expansion have been making daily headlines for more than a year, since the beginning of Moscow's annexation of eastern Ukraine. But those concerns don't seem to be translating into support for action to help the countries bordering Russia.
A significant cohort of Americans and a majority of the public in several European countries are firmly against intervening to support a NATO ally in the result that it's attacked.
Just over half of Americans, 56%, agree that the "US should use military force to defend a NATO ally against Russia" if the situation arises. That may not be much comfort to the nine NATO nations that were once Warsaw Pact countries.
---
In Italy, Germany, and France, three of the European Union's four biggest countries, more people think their country should not come to the defense of a NATO ally than think it should. Spain is pretty evenly divided, while Poland and the UK are more supportive.
Fears of Russian expansion have been making daily headlines for more than a year, since the beginning of Moscow's annexation of eastern Ukraine. But those concerns don't seem to be translating into support for action to help the countries bordering Russia.
A significant cohort of Americans and a majority of the public in several European countries are firmly against intervening to support a NATO ally in the result that it's attacked.
Just over half of Americans, 56%, agree that the "US should use military force to defend a NATO ally against Russia" if the situation arises. That may not be much comfort to the nine NATO nations that were once Warsaw Pact countries.
---
In Italy, Germany, and France, three of the European Union's four biggest countries, more people think their country should not come to the defense of a NATO ally than think it should. Spain is pretty evenly divided, while Poland and the UK are more supportive.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/west-just-basically-told-eastern-160000699.html
We didn't learn much from World War II.
Putin may be right. If he were to invade Estonia or Lativa, who are NATO countries, the west might be reluctant to respond. It would practically destroy the entire alliance. I guess we just have to hope Russia doesn't make that gamble.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 486 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Poll shows many would not support a war to protect a NATO ally (Original Post)
davidn3600
Jun 2015
OP
The respective publics may not support a military response, but there would be one.
BillZBubb
Jun 2015
#4
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)1. what percent of Germany/France/Italy would support
coming to their own defense?
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)2. If countries didn't respond to an attack
on a NATO member the countries that failed to respond could pretty much write off any opportunity to belong to any alliance. I don't see it happening.
There isn't a lot of wiggle room in the NATO charter. It basically says that an attack on one member is an attack on all.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)3. Yeah, who gives a fuck about them?
Damned uppity Balts just need to learn they'll always be Russia's little inconvenient neighbors.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)4. The respective publics may not support a military response, but there would be one.
The only problem is that it would probably be slow in coming as the various member states hemmed and hawed. Sort of like the response to the German invasions of WWII.
But in the end the treaty obligations would win out. There is no doubt the US, the UK, and Poland at the least would be pounding the table for action.