General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNevada GOP congressman: My kids ‘will not be a drain on society’ like disabled children
Rep. Cresent Hardy (R-NV) said recently at a Libertarian Party event that he hoped his children would never be a drain on society like people who were disabled.
In audio published this week by the Nevada State Democratic Party, Hardy can be heard speaking to attendees at the Libertarian Political Expo in Las Vegas.
I have three children, Hardy explains. One of them is summa cum laude and two were magna cum laude. The other one, he didnt need an education. He works for Raytheon, smarter than all the rest. He works hard, he builds things that are genius. Some people have that ability.
But they all work hard. They are raising their own families, he continued. They will not be a drain on society, the best they can. Hopefully they will never have some disability that causes them to have to utilize that.
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/06/nevada-gop-congressman-my-kids-will-not-be-a-drain-on-society-like-disabled-children/
shraby
(21,946 posts)coming son.
I never heard him disparaging disabled people once.
nuff said.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Just like his neighbor Cliven Bundy.
riversedge
(70,484 posts)bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)nt
shenmue
(38,506 posts)alboe
(192 posts)Like what makes someone do this?
merrily
(45,251 posts)disability portion of OASDI gets easier. So, the answer to your question is billionaires like Koch and Peterson, who can't stand to see the most needy among us get a damned break on their tax dollars, when they could put the money to more profitable use, like buying up elections and officeholders.
undergroundpanther
(11,925 posts)Of a sociopabth.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Ten bucks says Raytheon is a big donor to this guy. Yeah sure, hard work and genius!
merrily
(45,251 posts)I can only hope that one day, I can work up the courage to say how I really feel about Cresent Hardy.
wcmagumba
(2,893 posts)OMG
SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)I have three children, Hardy explains. One of them is summa cum laude and two were magna cum laude. The other one, he didnt need an education.
Doesn't that add up to 4 children?
xfundy
(5,105 posts)Disabled people are cared for thanks to gubmint help. It's in the millions, maybe billions. I welcome them going after the programs that help them. Come on, repigs, let's make them work and deny them benefits!
olddots
(10,237 posts)on Hannity's sagging nut sack . ( wow that was uncalled for )
undergroundpanther
(11,925 posts)People dont choose to be disabled,and for me being disabled in body and with mental injury caused by other people,it fucking hurts,its not sitting on ones ass draining the system you smug parasite.
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)SSI/SSDI can provide supportive income while a disabled person is working: they just aren't able to work enough to maintain a sustainable income to support themselves.
Guess what - the health condition of disabled people varies over a life time. They may even go off disability and enter the full-time workforce for swathes of time. It's actually the god-awful bureaucracy that people keep pegging on to "discourage fraud" that make this harder and harder to do.
Even if you aren't working for income - does that mean your life has no value? That just means you aren't able to meet some HR performance standards and that you couldn't meet the expectations of others.
But perhaps you could work at your own pace: write a novel, paint, develop a computer program - do something else that only you as a unique human being can do.
Often disabilities give a person a special lens upon the world. This is literal in the case of vision-related disabilities. Whole books have been written on ophthalmology and modern art.
Gifted and Talented programs for children used to be justified by the idea of "what if we're missing a little Einstein or a little da Vinci?" Well, why do we only ask that of children? By devaluing disabled people, we could also be missing that Einstein or da Vinci as well.
csziggy
(34,141 posts)Paraphrasing you.
Just think, if the British National Health Service weren't so good, Stephen Hawking would be long dead and the world would not have his brilliance to help us understand the universe.
Remember this, back during the debates about the ACA?
Professor Stephen Hawking defended the National Health Service from attacks by the American Right, claiming that he would not be alive without it.
By Damien McElroy
7:29PM BST 12 Aug 2009
The British physisist spoke out after Republican politicians lambasted the NHS as "evil" in their effort to stop President Barack Obama's reforms of US health care which will widen availability of treatment but at a cost to higher earners who will pay higher insurance premiums.
"I wouldn't be here today if it were not for the NHS," he said. "I have received a large amount of high-quality treatment without which I would not have survived."
Prof Hawking, who has had Lou Gehrig's disease for 40 years, was in Washington to be awarded the America's highest civilian honour, the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
He received emergency treatment in April at Addenbrooke's hospital in Cambridge. An American newspaper subsequently used Prof Hawking as an example of the deficiencies of the NHS. "People such as scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn't have a chance in the UK, where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless," it claimed.
More: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6017878/Stephen-Hawking-I-would-not-be-alive-without-the-NHS.html