General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary spurns Fox News: Fox’s Ed Henry Visibly Upset by Inability to Ask Hillary a Question
The saga of Hillary Clinton versus Ed Henry continued Monday afternoon when the Fox News reporter lined up for questions following a campaign event and was completely left out.
According to the Washington Examiner, Clinton answered questions from the Washington Post, MSNBC and others not including Fox. When the event ended, Henry could be seen trying to get a question out of the Democratic presidential candidate, becoming visibly upset as she his whisked away and surrounded by staffers and supporters.
Henry and the candidate had an infamous run-in earlier this year, during an Iowa stop in which Clinton said she will put answering questions on her list of for due consideration.
Video @ link:
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/foxs-ed-henry-visibly-upset-by-inability-to-ask-hillary-a-question/
Poor Ed...
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Hillary doesn't need the press to win and that is upsetting them all. She sure as hell doesn't need Faux Snooze!
Kingofalldems
(38,520 posts)Fox is not a news organization
still_one
(92,554 posts)to deal with rude people is ignore them
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)brush
(53,981 posts)Is it sarcasm?
ohnoyoudidnt
(1,858 posts)rpannier
(24,353 posts)That's all faux talks about
Why should she answer the same lame, irrelevant questions over-and-over?
onecaliberal
(33,016 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)no one should answer questions from Fox News. They have no standing for their "righteous" indignation.
Spazito
(50,656 posts)Note it's not to report the news, it's "make the news" as he stated in this old article from his CNN days, it's a doozy and not in a good way:
"It was a surprise line of inquiry. The president made news by saying the policy was under review -- and a few weeks later he overturned it.
I was heading into this event with the same strategy: make news on something unexpected (I won't tell you which topics I was working on cause it would ruin the surprise for a future presser or interview with the president)."
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/25/henry.obama/index.html
Complete pissant.
lpbk2713
(42,777 posts)HRC has better things to do with her time than to waste it on the RNC propaganda machine.
Cha
(298,149 posts)thanks Cali!
ZX86
(1,428 posts)Fox News will have nothing good to say about her now!
nilram
(2,895 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Gothmog
(146,040 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)went on with O'Reilly. Please ignore them
ZX86
(1,428 posts)Fox News can go to hell.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Or will they completely ignore Fox's temper tantrum and do their jobs as best they can without worrying about Fox?
Rex
(65,616 posts)Good move.
One day the history books will right about this extremely volatile political group that tried to destroy the world.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)rpannier
(24,353 posts)Poor, poor Ed
mountain grammy
(26,677 posts)Ed Henry's a fool.
jalan48
(13,921 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Jimvanhise
(304 posts)Why is Fox News acting surprised? They've had it in for Hillary for years. When she ran for the Senate from New York, Fox News literally said that she couldn't win because "everybody hates her." No, just Fox News hates her so why should she give them so much as the time of day?
Hekate
(91,057 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)I'm kinda' quick like that though. When someone pegs my bullshit meter I bail on 'm
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)All our candidates ought to have the guts to ignore Fox.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)She will likely do entertainment when she is done with the pressing urgency that is the primaries. Saturday night live, Fallon etc...all will come later. Fox will have to see if and when their importance bubble to the top of Hillarys list.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)And Make Sure Fox News Has No Role in the Democratic Debates.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Why would anyone take Fox seriously?