General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTaking down the Confederate flag musn’t obscure the South’s vile history
A man holds up a flag outside Emanuel AME Church on June 20, 2015 in Charleston, South Carolina.
In the worst possible way responding to an unspeakable act of racist barbarism we have stumbled into one of our all-too-rare Reconsider the Confederacy weeks. This years week looks as though it will lead to the relegation of the Confederate battle flag to museums and historys dung heap, where it belongs.
But once the flag is taken down, it will still be easy to avert our eyes, and moral sensibilities, from the grotesque reality that was the antebellum South and the Confederacys fight to preserve it. Fortunately, in just the past year, groundbreaking books on American slavery have been published, one of which The Half Has Never Been Told, by Cornell University history professor Edward Baptist documents in painful detail how slavery worked.
In the early decades of the 19th century, as the tobacco fields of Virginia and Maryland played out, and Native Americans were forcibly expelled from Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi, more than 800,000 slaves, largely from the Mid-Atlantic region, were sold to the cotton planters whod taken the Native Americans lands. Those relocated slaves their families sundered invariably spoke or wrote, when they were able to leave recollections behind, of how much harsher and more systemically violent was the regimen inflicted on them after they were forced to move to the Deep South cotton belt (most frequently on foot, in chained processions). Nor was the violence random: Lashings and beatings were characteristically inflicted on slaves who failed to meet their daily quotas of pounds of picked cotton.
Even as the Confederacy was formed to preserve a gulag archipelago of slave labor camps, so the way in which the Confederacy fought the Civil War reflected the violent racism at the heart of the Southern system. The problem with the reenactments of Civil War battles is that theyre sanitized of all such racism. Reenactments of Gettysburg the Confederacys one campaign that reached into a Northern free state omit reenactments of Lees army kidnapping African American Pennsylvania civilians, many of them free since birth, and taking them south to be enslaved. Reenactments of battles that took place between 1863 and 1865 when 200,000 black soldiers served in the Union Army dont conclude with the Confederate side reenacting the execution or enslavement of black prisoners of war, which were common occurrences.
So, yes, removing the Confederate battle flag from places of honor seems an excellent idea. And while were at it, scrapping the voter identification laws enacted to suppress minority voting and putting an end to the systematic incarceration and police harassment of young black men are in order as well. Dispelling our legacy of violent racism requires more than furling a flag.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/taking-down-the-confederate-flag-wont-fix-everything/2015/06/24/f1f837c2-1a97-11e5-93b7-5eddc056ad8a_story.html?hpid=z2
__________________________
Most EXCELLENT read from WAPO's Harold Meyerson. Cannot recommend it enough. And, now I want to read
The Half Has Never Been Told, by Cornell University history professor Edward Baptist.
malaise
(269,371 posts)True words - removing the flag is hardly enough
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)The way that Southern Whites have defined themselves for generations has been corrosive to our culture as a whole (and not just in the South) - they lies they have told themselves about the Civil War and it's meaning have had long ranging consequences. So while I agree that this is just a step, and mostly a symbolic step at that, it is still very meaningful.
Bryant
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)the unspeakable horror that was the American institution of slavery.
The US must face the fact that slavery's lethal legacy is still very much with us.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)I've had plenty of talks with white southerners and neo-Confederates (maddening talks) - I don't think it's a baby step. I'm happy to see it.
Bryant
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Died in the wool racist aren't going to be moved by this; by which I mean people who consciously look at black people (and other people of color) and believe them to be inferior.
On the other hand the white washing of history and unconscious racism of a lot of people (not just in the south) is shaken by being forced to confront these racist symbols and what they mean.
Bryant
Iggo
(47,605 posts)me b zola
(19,053 posts)Outstanding post