Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 09:36 AM Jun 2015

Taking down the Confederate flag musn’t obscure the South’s vile history


A man holds up a flag outside Emanuel AME Church on June 20, 2015 in Charleston, South Carolina.

In the worst possible way — responding to an unspeakable act of racist barbarism — we have stumbled into one of our all-too-rare “Reconsider the Confederacy” weeks. This year’s week looks as though it will lead to the relegation of the Confederate battle flag to museums and history’s dung heap, where it belongs.

But once the flag is taken down, it will still be easy to avert our eyes, and moral sensibilities, from the grotesque reality that was the antebellum South and the Confederacy’s fight to preserve it. Fortunately, in just the past year, groundbreaking books on American slavery have been published, one of which — “The Half Has Never Been Told,” by Cornell University history professor Edward Baptist — documents in painful detail how slavery worked.

In the early decades of the 19th century, as the tobacco fields of Virginia and Maryland played out, and Native Americans were forcibly expelled from Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi, more than 800,000 slaves, largely from the Mid-Atlantic region, were sold to the cotton planters who’d taken the Native Americans’ lands. Those relocated slaves — their families sundered — invariably spoke or wrote, when they were able to leave recollections behind, of how much harsher and more systemically violent was the regimen inflicted on them after they were forced to move to the Deep South cotton belt (most frequently on foot, in chained processions). Nor was the violence random: Lashings and beatings were characteristically inflicted on slaves who failed to meet their daily quotas of pounds of picked cotton.

Even as the Confederacy was formed to preserve a gulag archipelago of slave labor camps, so the way in which the Confederacy fought the Civil War reflected the violent racism at the heart of the Southern system. The problem with the reenactments of Civil War battles is that they’re sanitized of all such racism. Reenactments of Gettysburg — the Confederacy’s one campaign that reached into a Northern free state — omit reenactments of Lee’s army kidnapping African American Pennsylvania civilians, many of them free since birth, and taking them south to be enslaved. Reenactments of battles that took place between 1863 and 1865 — when 200,000 black soldiers served in the Union Army — don’t conclude with the Confederate side reenacting the execution or enslavement of black prisoners of war, which were common occurrences.

So, yes, removing the Confederate battle flag from places of honor seems an excellent idea. And while we’re at it, scrapping the voter identification laws enacted to suppress minority voting and putting an end to the systematic incarceration and police harassment of young black men are in order as well. Dispelling our legacy of violent racism requires more than furling a flag.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/taking-down-the-confederate-flag-wont-fix-everything/2015/06/24/f1f837c2-1a97-11e5-93b7-5eddc056ad8a_story.html?hpid=z2

__________________________

Most EXCELLENT read from WAPO's Harold Meyerson. Cannot recommend it enough. And, now I want to read
The Half Has Never Been Told,” by Cornell University history professor Edward Baptist.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Taking down the Confederate flag musn’t obscure the South’s vile history (Original Post) Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 OP
Excellent read malaise Jun 2015 #1
Amen! Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #8
I totally agree that it's just a step - but it's a step I wasn't sure we'd ever be willing to take el_bryanto Jun 2015 #2
Small baby step, taken under duress, toward dealing with Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #3
I don't know - I live in the South el_bryanto Jun 2015 #4
If the symbolic act of removing a racist icon can really change hearts and minds--then halleluiah! Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #5
It depends on where you think hearts and minds are el_bryanto Jun 2015 #9
Nine dead in Charleston. Iggo Jun 2015 #6
K&R me b zola Jun 2015 #7
Sounds like they need to bring back Reconstruction to be honest. n/t ncjustice80 Jun 2015 #10
It won't. Facts remain. mmonk Jun 2015 #11
As is SO often said when another holocaust anniversary comes up: NEVER FORGET! Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #12

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
2. I totally agree that it's just a step - but it's a step I wasn't sure we'd ever be willing to take
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 09:56 AM
Jun 2015

The way that Southern Whites have defined themselves for generations has been corrosive to our culture as a whole (and not just in the South) - they lies they have told themselves about the Civil War and it's meaning have had long ranging consequences. So while I agree that this is just a step, and mostly a symbolic step at that, it is still very meaningful.

Bryant

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
3. Small baby step, taken under duress, toward dealing with
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 10:06 AM
Jun 2015

the unspeakable horror that was the American institution of slavery.

The US must face the fact that slavery's lethal legacy is still very much with us.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
4. I don't know - I live in the South
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 10:08 AM
Jun 2015

I've had plenty of talks with white southerners and neo-Confederates (maddening talks) - I don't think it's a baby step. I'm happy to see it.

Bryant

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
9. It depends on where you think hearts and minds are
Thu Jun 25, 2015, 10:55 AM
Jun 2015

Died in the wool racist aren't going to be moved by this; by which I mean people who consciously look at black people (and other people of color) and believe them to be inferior.

On the other hand the white washing of history and unconscious racism of a lot of people (not just in the south) is shaken by being forced to confront these racist symbols and what they mean.

Bryant

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Taking down the Confedera...