My comment re: Scalia's dissent, posted to a NY Times editorial
This is the text of a comment I posted to a very fine New York Times editorial on the gay marriage decision titled, "A Profound Ruling Delivers Justice on Gay Marriage":
In his rather unhinged dissent, Justice Scalia whines:
"A system of government that makes the People subordinate to a committee of nine unelected lawyers does not deserve to be called a democracy.
. . . .
This practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the freedom to govern themselves."
Touching, isn't it, this great concern for the people's right to self governance? So, I have to wonder: where was that concern in Bush v. Gore, when Scalia and his buddies thought it was perfectly okay to stop an election recount that was ongoing and to simply appoint the President they happened to prefer? Where was it in Citizens United and the other campaign finance decisions that opened our elections, and indeed our government itself, to unbridled influence by corporate interests?
In any event, to the extent that self-government by "the people" isn't an entirely laughable notion anyway at this stage in our history, there has also been a long-standing principle, recognized by the Court, that fundamental rights are not subject to majority vote. The Court has long recognized marriage as such a fundamental right. If, in fact, fundamental rights were to be subject to the whims of majority vote, NOBODY's rights would ever be safe.
= new reply since forum marked as read
Well done, you nailed it.
you show considerable restraint. And it's an excellent comment on substance as well.
at least.
Some little ill-placed and rather inappropriate and even nonsensical cuties, for sure:
"The Court's next bit of interpretive jiggery-pokery..."
And "Pure applesauce,"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/25/scalia-dissent_n_7662702.html
Seriously? This is a grown man, supposedly one of the most highly-educated and esteemed legal minds ...
I think the rather infantile snark in his remarks (rather crude, tasteless, and yes, childish, for a 79-year-old Supreme Court Associate Justice and the decorum that attends such a position) suggest a serious questioning of this man's sanity. Are we witnessing his mental and intellectual decline? Deterioration? Are we watching a senior government official slowly but steadily coming unspooled?
I think maybe it's time to start questioning his mental acuity and indeed, his sanity. It's certainly worth asking questions about. This individual appears to be increasingly and manifestly mentally unstable. Perhaps it's time to question his ability to continue performing his job.
Hey scalia - maybe it's time to consider heading out to pasture? Surely this is just not as much fun anymore, if nothing else, 'eh? I can't imagine it's still fun for you, especially as you see some of your "ideals" being judicially unraveled.
Just sayin'... (she said, attempting to plant a new meme...) 
He has a Facebook page 
https://www.facebook.com/markpkessinger
Thank you! 
