Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 10:52 AM Jun 2015

Justices uphold use of drug implicated in botched executions

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court upheld the use of a controversial drug in lethal injection executions Monday, as two dissenting justices said for the first time that they think it's "highly likely" that the death penalty itself is unconstitutional.

The justices voted 5-4 in a case from Oklahoma that the sedative midazolam can be used in executions without violating the Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

The drug was used in executions in Arizona, Ohio and Oklahoma in 2014 that took longer than usual and raised concerns that it did not perform its intended task of putting inmates into a coma-like sleep.

Justice Samuel Alito said for a conservative majority that arguments the drug could not be used effectively as a sedative in executions is speculative.

http://apnews.excite.com/article/20150629/us--supreme_court-execution_drug-92f60c6c78.html

__________________

What an obsenity. Europe believes this kind of barbarity harks back to the middle ages. The death penalty disappeared in Europe decades ago.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justices uphold use of drug implicated in botched executions (Original Post) Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 OP
But Breyer and Ginsberg would be open to reconsidering the constitutionality of the death penalty NightWatcher Jun 2015 #1
They have now openly questioned its constitutionality. Time to stop the barbarity... Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #2
Cruel and unusual HassleCat Jun 2015 #3
Barbaric blood lust and revenge rage... Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #4

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
1. But Breyer and Ginsberg would be open to reconsidering the constitutionality of the death penalty
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 10:57 AM
Jun 2015

Lets take the WH and pack the courts with (relative) Lefties, so that we can get off the list of countries that continue this barbaric practice.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
2. They have now openly questioned its constitutionality. Time to stop the barbarity...
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 11:00 AM
Jun 2015
"Lets take the WH and pack the courts with (relative) Lefties..."


From your keyboard to the Creative Entity's agenda!
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
3. Cruel and unusual
Mon Jun 29, 2015, 11:03 AM
Jun 2015

The words "cruel" and "unusual" don't belong together when discussing the death penalty, since the usual plan is to be intentionally cruel. This lethal injection business is just the latest example. It would be relatively easy to kill someone painlessly. A large overdose of heroin would do the job, and death might even be a pleasant experience for the condemned. Instead, we get a procedure that collapses the lungs as the first step, so the condemned person gets to suffocate for a few seconds, until they inject something that stops the heart. So we have someone who is suffocating, probably while conscious or semi-conscious, then we give them the pleasure of a heart attack. What? We couldn't add an additional torture step to the process? This just illustrates the strong elements of revenge and (biblical?) retribution involved with the death penalty. It has nothing to do with justice. It makes some people feel better to kill their fellow citizens, and that's about it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justices uphold use of dr...