General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustices uphold use of drug implicated in botched executions
WASHINGTON (AP) The Supreme Court upheld the use of a controversial drug in lethal injection executions Monday, as two dissenting justices said for the first time that they think it's "highly likely" that the death penalty itself is unconstitutional.
The justices voted 5-4 in a case from Oklahoma that the sedative midazolam can be used in executions without violating the Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
The drug was used in executions in Arizona, Ohio and Oklahoma in 2014 that took longer than usual and raised concerns that it did not perform its intended task of putting inmates into a coma-like sleep.
Justice Samuel Alito said for a conservative majority that arguments the drug could not be used effectively as a sedative in executions is speculative.
http://apnews.excite.com/article/20150629/us--supreme_court-execution_drug-92f60c6c78.html
__________________
What an obsenity. Europe believes this kind of barbarity harks back to the middle ages. The death penalty disappeared in Europe decades ago.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Lets take the WH and pack the courts with (relative) Lefties, so that we can get off the list of countries that continue this barbaric practice.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)From your keyboard to the Creative Entity's agenda!
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)The words "cruel" and "unusual" don't belong together when discussing the death penalty, since the usual plan is to be intentionally cruel. This lethal injection business is just the latest example. It would be relatively easy to kill someone painlessly. A large overdose of heroin would do the job, and death might even be a pleasant experience for the condemned. Instead, we get a procedure that collapses the lungs as the first step, so the condemned person gets to suffocate for a few seconds, until they inject something that stops the heart. So we have someone who is suffocating, probably while conscious or semi-conscious, then we give them the pleasure of a heart attack. What? We couldn't add an additional torture step to the process? This just illustrates the strong elements of revenge and (biblical?) retribution involved with the death penalty. It has nothing to do with justice. It makes some people feel better to kill their fellow citizens, and that's about it.