General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Stunning, Scorching Accusation in Justice Sotomayor’s Death Penalty Dissent
On Monday, the Supreme Court upheld the use of midazolam in lethal injections, despite the fact that the drug may have been responsible for several botched, extremely painful executions in 2014. The vote was 54, with the usual lineup of conservatives against liberals. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a scorching, devastating dissent that carefully disproved both the facts and logic of Justice Samuel Alito's majority opinion. Sotomayor noted that Alitos decision rested on the fact that the prisoners had not demonstrated that the state could obtain other, more humane drugs to kill themso it can go ahead and execute them with the potentially torturous midazolam. In a stunning passage, she then lobs this accusation at the majority:
Petitioners contend that Oklahomas current protocol is a barbarous method of punishmentthe chemical equivalent of being burned alive. But under the Courts new rule, it would not matter whether the State intended to use midazolam, or instead to have petitioners drawn and quartered, slowly tortured to death, or actually burned at the stake: because petitioners failed to prove the availability of sodium thiopental or pentobarbital, the State could execute them using whatever means it designated.
Alito's only response to this charge? That is simply not true.
###
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/06/29/glossip_v_gross_sotomayor_s_scorching_death_penalty_accusation.html?
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)Isn't that what he muttered during the State of the Union?
Land Shark
(6,346 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)Remember Obama's State of the Union address where he criticized the Supreme Court decision that opened the floodgates for unchecked dark to buy our elections, and Alito shook his head and mouthed "not true".
He hasn't been right yet.
Spazito
(50,645 posts)and seeing as they didn't, well, anything goes, imo
Geez, geez, geez.
lobodons
(1,290 posts)I am not sure Alito understands what that phrase means.
(Reminds me of clip from Princess Bride)
roody
(10,849 posts)Painlessly, but not humans?
madville
(7,413 posts)Is it that difficult to figure out how to do it peacefully?
I think a major hurdle is the manufacturers won't supply their products for death penalty use.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)about people who hold such tremendous power to do good, fuck it up!
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)Remember when he famously shook his head no during President Obama's State of the Union Address? What an ass!
Maineman
(854 posts)Or, perhaps he is just a brazen arrogant ideologue. Hmm. Perhaps he is all of those.