Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 01:43 PM Jul 2015

In a small town in Washington state, pride and shame over atomic legacy

Al Jazeera
http://alj.am/1HLMTbf

In a small town in Washington state, pride and shame over atomic legacy

The workers at Hanford’s nuclear reactors in the early 1940s knew their jobs were important, even if many of them didn’t know why. They worked hard, and they were paid well. They tucked their children into bed at night in handsome homes with green lawns on streets named for brilliant engineers — Goethals Drive, Jadwin Avenue. The secrecy around Hanford, a part of the Manhattan Project, came to light on Aug. 9, 1945, when U.S. forces dropped Fat Man, a thick-bellied, 10,000-pound plutonium-filled bomb.

Read more:  Fat Man targeted Nagasaki, Japan
http://america.aljazeera.com/multimedia/2015/7/richland-washingtons-atomic-legacy.html?utm_campaign=wklynewsletter072315&utm_medium=email&utm_source=editorialnewsletter

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In a small town in Washington state, pride and shame over atomic legacy (Original Post) Panich52 Jul 2015 OP
I was born just a week before the Hiroshima and Nagasaki MineralMan Jul 2015 #1
Hanford was huge... hunter Jul 2015 #2

MineralMan

(146,351 posts)
1. I was born just a week before the Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 02:09 PM
Jul 2015

bombs were dropped. I didn't really learn about them for a number of years, of course. I was too young. Every year, around this time, the topic emerges again, and the arguments over whether we should or should not have used nuclear weapons in WWII are made once again.

As always, I can see both sides of the argument clearly. Yet, the actual correct answer is always elusive. So, I no longer participate in the argument. I'm a nuclear baby, in a way. The legacies of FDR, who authorized the development of nuclear weapons, and of Truman, who made the final decision use them hinge, in part, on the answer to the question.

As with everything, either answer is both correct and incorrect. We remain the only nation that has ever used nuclear weapons in wartime. We participated in the long cold war that saw the creation of a doomsday's worth of them. It's all a part of our history, some 70 years past and gone. The war ended. The cold war began.

I'll be turning 70 next week. I'm a nuclear baby. I was born in a small town in Arizona to a 21-year-old woman. At the time, my father, still just 20, was still flying B-17s out of Italy and Northern Africa, by then just ferrying people from place to place, rather than flying bombing missions in a war that had already ended. Both of them turn 91 this year. Both are still with us. We long ago stopped talking about Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

I no longer discuss it, either. It's history that happened only days after I was born. Later, I was in that group that frequently dived under school desks in "A-bomb" drills. My childhood was one where I had nightmares of nuclear explosions over nearby Los Angeles. I remember the meltdown of the first nuclear electrical reactor in commercial use when I was in Junior High School, just 20 miles from my California home town.

History is what it is. I hope we have learned from it. That's the best I can do.

hunter

(38,350 posts)
2. Hanford was huge...
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 02:13 PM
Jul 2015

... built to produce plutonium on a massive scale, many tons of it in anticipation of full scale nuclear war in Europe, first against Nazi Germany, then later against the Soviet Union.

By 1963, the Hanford Site was home to nine nuclear reactors along the Columbia River, five reprocessing plants on the central plateau, and more than 900 support buildings and radiological laboratories around the site.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanford_Site


The last reactor was shut down in 1987.

Nagasaki was horrible in every way, a ghastly deliberate study of what nuclear bombs do to people and a living city, but maybe a greater horror is that human beings could look at that, the political leaders of this world, and not immediately say to themselves, "What the hell are we doing here???" and put an immediate end to it.

We can say the same of fossil fuels too. They will destroy this civilization just as certainly as a nuclear world war would.

Just as individual humans can't quit destructive habits like smoking, nations can't quit destructive habits like nuclear weapons manufacture and fossil fuel use.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In a small town in Washin...