General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBill Clinton criticizes Obama's Bain attacks, praises Romney's ‘sterling business career'
Bill Clinton criticizes Obama's Bain attacks, praises Romney's sterling business career'
By Holly Bailey
June 1, 2012
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/bill-clinton-criticizes-obamas-bain-attacks-praises-romneys/story?id=16474493
Former President Bill Clinton suggested in a television interview Thursday that he believes President Obama's re-election campaign should stop trashing Mitt Romney's work in the private equity industry.
In an interview with CNN's "Piers Morgan Tonight," Clinton, a top Obama surrogate who is set to raise cash with the president next week, directly contradicted Democrats who have attacked Romney's business record, suggesting it does qualify him for president.
"I think he had a good business career," Clinton told guest host Harvey Weinstein, a movie mogul who is one of Obama's top fundraisers. "There's no question that in terms of getting up and going to the office and, you know, basically performing the essential functions of the office, the man who has been governor and had a sterling business career crosses the qualification threshold."
Adding that he has "friends" in the private equity business," Clinton suggested it was dangerous for Democrats to go after Romney's record at Bain Capitaladding that in private equity, "like everything else you try, you don't always succeed" in saving companies or making them more productive.
"I don't think that we ought to get into the position where we say this is bad work," Clinton said. "This is good work."
<<snip>>
MADem
(135,425 posts)Lint Head
(15,064 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)Always has been, always will be.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)Because, you know, "like everything else" the government tries, they "don't always succeed" in kickstarting every business in an otherwise critical industry.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)[font size=8]NAFTA[/font]
Demit
(11,238 posts)So does Obama. And they all know they can depend on you two nominal Democrats. The criticism of Bain is window-dressing, a sop for us "fucking retards" as Rahm so eloquently called liberals, now that it's campaign time...but can't you at least keep up the pretense until November? Or is this another ploy to woo those so-called independents? God, 'Democrats' like these make me sick.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)razorman
(1,644 posts)The Clintons do nothing that is not calculated for their own benefit. I am convinced that Mrs. Clinton still wants to be president very badly, in spite of her protests otherwise. Perhaps they believe that if they can undermine President Obama's campaign enough, he may decline to run for re-election. If that happens, the nomination will, of course, be handed to Mrs. Clinton. Although I could just be turning into a paranoid conspiracy-theorist.
still_one
(92,552 posts)signing the bill for deregulation that had been pushed since the reagan era
fuc* him. He is one of the main reasons the Democratic party is in the sad shape it is today.
dajoki
(10,678 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Last edited Sat Jun 2, 2012, 01:57 AM - Edit history (1)
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Jobs were being exported in the '70s, but the pace really picked up in the '80s.