General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan Copy Editors Really Save Amercia, and Does Amercia Want Saving?
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/entertainment/2012/06/can-copy-editors-really-save-amercia-and-does-amercia-want-saving/53069/Except, the problem is, ever greater numbers of useven in such esteemed publications as The New Yorker, even regarding such established celebrity names as Katharine Hepburn (it's an "a" in the second syllable, not an "e" are making copy mistsakes dayley.* This has caught the attention of Merrill Perlman, who writes the "Language Corner" blog for Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism and is a former editor at The New York Times. It's something she knows all to well. So today a post by her appears on CNN.com, a news organization not immune to the typo itself, because who is? In her piece, Perlman bemoans the lack of copy editors in contemporary journalism, from print to Web to TV. To support her thesis, she includes an amusing slideshow of the kinds of typos one is likely to find not only in journalism but on menus (buttscotch liqueur, anyone?), on product packaging, and so on. Everywhere you look where there are words, there are likely to be more and more mistakes. There's really no sign of it stopping. It's terrfying.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)American spellings are different than British and jargon is very regional. Now there are text spellings.
I don't find the variance of spelling or even the simple mistakes to be "terrifying." Many are amusing, and the true measure of communication should be whether or not the listener or reader understands it. Beyond that, perhaps, how efficiently and densely it convey information....
...irregardless of spelling !
WriteWrong
(85 posts)and the anti-intellectual wing is arguing for "alternative spellings", "alternative grammar", "alternative syntax", "alternative vocabulary" as though these things don't negatively impact actual communication.
Cui bono? Who profits from less effective communication?
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)for 30 outdoors magazines, and resent being classified as dumb.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)LOL.
ashling
(25,771 posts)fuzzy language is a sign of fuzzy thinking. I deal with this in trying to coax critical thinking out of college students. Some of the language and spelling is atrocious ... and when they want to and then the want to answer essay questions in texting jargon.
I start from the assumption that everybody makes mistakes, but their is a difference between "whether" and "weather." I'm trying to get them to understand basic but sometimes foreign concepts about the federal budgetand they refuse to be bothered to learn the difference between "physical" and "fiscal."
There are some very bright students in my classes, but there are some that work very hard at no working at all.