Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ashling

(25,771 posts)
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 06:59 PM Jun 2012

Can Copy Editors Really Save Amercia, and Does Amercia Want Saving?

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/entertainment/2012/06/can-copy-editors-really-save-amercia-and-does-amercia-want-saving/53069/

A highlight this week for many was the Mitt Romney campaign's hilarious misspelling of America, which appeared, instead, as Amercia, spurring laughs and, obviously, a meme in short order. Because if there's one thing 2012 Amercia loves, it's to feel smarter than a potential president (or anyone), and one easy way to feel smarter than other people is to spell better than they do—and to catch their mistakes, and point out their clear stupidity at having made them.

Except, the problem is, ever greater numbers of us—even in such esteemed publications as The New Yorker, even regarding such established celebrity names as Katharine Hepburn (it's an "a" in the second syllable, not an "e&quot are making copy mistsakes dayley.* This has caught the attention of Merrill Perlman, who writes the "Language Corner" blog for Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism and is a former editor at The New York Times. It's something she knows all to well. So today a post by her appears on CNN.com, a news organization not immune to the typo itself, because who is? In her piece, Perlman bemoans the lack of copy editors in contemporary journalism, from print to Web to TV. To support her thesis, she includes an amusing slideshow of the kinds of typos one is likely to find not only in journalism but on menus (buttscotch liqueur, anyone?), on product packaging, and so on. Everywhere you look where there are words, there are likely to be more and more mistakes. There's really no sign of it stopping. It's terrfying.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can Copy Editors Really Save Amercia, and Does Amercia Want Saving? (Original Post) ashling Jun 2012 OP
Accepted spellings have always varied within the greater English language KurtNYC Jun 2012 #1
There's plenty of copy editors, most I've seen are just dumb, like other Americans WriteWrong Jun 2012 #2
Excuse me, I am a former copy editor RebelOne Jun 2012 #3
"There's plenty" tabasco Jun 2012 #4
I subscribe to Susan Jacoby's view that ashling Jun 2012 #5

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
1. Accepted spellings have always varied within the greater English language
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 08:21 PM
Jun 2012

American spellings are different than British and jargon is very regional. Now there are text spellings.

I don't find the variance of spelling or even the simple mistakes to be "terrifying." Many are amusing, and the true measure of communication should be whether or not the listener or reader understands it. Beyond that, perhaps, how efficiently and densely it convey information....

...irregardless of spelling !

 

WriteWrong

(85 posts)
2. There's plenty of copy editors, most I've seen are just dumb, like other Americans
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 08:35 PM
Jun 2012

and the anti-intellectual wing is arguing for "alternative spellings", "alternative grammar", "alternative syntax", "alternative vocabulary" as though these things don't negatively impact actual communication.

Cui bono? Who profits from less effective communication?

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
3. Excuse me, I am a former copy editor
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 08:56 PM
Jun 2012

for 30 outdoors magazines, and resent being classified as dumb.

ashling

(25,771 posts)
5. I subscribe to Susan Jacoby's view that
Sat Jun 2, 2012, 12:11 AM
Jun 2012

fuzzy language is a sign of fuzzy thinking. I deal with this in trying to coax critical thinking out of college students. Some of the language and spelling is atrocious ... and when they want to and then the want to answer essay questions in texting jargon.

I start from the assumption that everybody makes mistakes, but their is a difference between "whether" and "weather." I'm trying to get them to understand basic but sometimes foreign concepts about the federal budgetand they refuse to be bothered to learn the difference between "physical" and "fiscal."

There are some very bright students in my classes, but there are some that work very hard at no working at all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can Copy Editors Really S...