Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spanone

(135,960 posts)
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 09:11 AM Jun 2012

wisconsin election money disparity

Part of the disparity can be explained by the fact that Walker, as a sitting governor facing recall, is not subject to the state's legal limits on campaign contributions under Wisconsin law. Barrett, by contrast, was legally barred from accepting contributions in excess of $10,000 per person.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57446997-503544/wisconsin-recall-election-will-scott-walker-survive/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
wisconsin election money disparity (Original Post) spanone Jun 2012 OP
Yes. Jackpine Radical Jun 2012 #1
the money numbers are pretty stunning.... spanone Jun 2012 #2
Welcome To Post Citizens United... KharmaTrain Jun 2012 #3
Yes. This is a test of whether a highly-energized grassroots movement can win Jackpine Radical Jun 2012 #4
That is just so wrong.. ananda Jun 2012 #5

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
1. Yes.
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 09:17 AM
Jun 2012

Besides which, even if Barrett were not thus handicapped, the corporatists would be unlikely to finance him as they do Walker.

spanone

(135,960 posts)
2. the money numbers are pretty stunning....
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 09:19 AM
Jun 2012

Walker had raised $30.5 million, with about two-thirds of that total coming from donors outside Wisconsin. Barrett had raised $4 million, with about one-fourth coming from outside the state.

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
3. Welcome To Post Citizens United...
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 09:24 AM
Jun 2012

Unless Democrats openly court billionaires we'll see spending disparities in many elections to come. Local election laws be damned as SuperPacs will spend as they see fit.

The game here is beating the big money with "people power"...all the money in the world can't buy a motivated ground game and that's what wins elections. We'll see if the massive money bombardment over the airwaves is enough to counteract the old-fashioned knocking on doors. If money can buy elections, what's left of this democracy is doomed.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
4. Yes. This is a test of whether a highly-energized grassroots movement can win
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 09:57 AM
Jun 2012

against unlimited corporate funding.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»wisconsin election money ...