General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumswisconsin election money disparity
Part of the disparity can be explained by the fact that Walker, as a sitting governor facing recall, is not subject to the state's legal limits on campaign contributions under Wisconsin law. Barrett, by contrast, was legally barred from accepting contributions in excess of $10,000 per person.http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57446997-503544/wisconsin-recall-election-will-scott-walker-survive/
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Besides which, even if Barrett were not thus handicapped, the corporatists would be unlikely to finance him as they do Walker.
spanone
(135,960 posts)Walker had raised $30.5 million, with about two-thirds of that total coming from donors outside Wisconsin. Barrett had raised $4 million, with about one-fourth coming from outside the state.
KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)Unless Democrats openly court billionaires we'll see spending disparities in many elections to come. Local election laws be damned as SuperPacs will spend as they see fit.
The game here is beating the big money with "people power"...all the money in the world can't buy a motivated ground game and that's what wins elections. We'll see if the massive money bombardment over the airwaves is enough to counteract the old-fashioned knocking on doors. If money can buy elections, what's left of this democracy is doomed.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)against unlimited corporate funding.
ananda
(28,926 posts).. considering the way campaigns are so money driven.