Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lovuian

(19,362 posts)
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 08:04 PM Jun 2012

Right to copy vs. copyright: FBI accused of ‘stealing’ Megaupload evidence

http://rt.com/usa/news/fbi-steal-megaupload-evidence-287/

While the owners of the Megaupload.com website are locked in lawsuits over illegal data sharing, the FBI is suspected of removing evidence against them without permission. The Bureau claims there was no violation: the obtained evidence is “digital.”

­The legal team of Kim Dotcom, the owner of the file-sharing website, has launched an offensive against the FBI. They argue the Bureau has illegally copied data from Dotcom’s computers and sent cloned information to America.

“The first [copies] were sent without the New Zealand Police having any say in it whatsoever. If [they] went offshore without the consent of the attorney-general, it was an illegal act,” said William Akel, Dotcom’s lawyer, as quoted by the New Zealand daily Stuff.

New Zealand authorities were summoned to court to explain how the FBI was allowed to remove the data from the country. Their lawyers maintained that the act was legal as the relevant law only covered "physical" items.

Interesting case for the lawyers
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Right to copy vs. copyrig...