General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDems discuss dropping Wasserman Schultz
Democrats on Capitol Hill are discussing whether Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz should step down as Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman before the partys national convention in July.
Democrats backing likely presidential nominee Hillary Clinton worry Wasserman Schultz has become too divisive a figure to unify the party in 2016, which they say is crucial to defeating presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump in November
"There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultzs head on, said one pro-Clinton Democratic senator.The lawmaker said senators huddled on the chamber floor last week to talk about Wasserman Schultzs future and estimated that about a dozen have weighed in during private conversations.
A senior Senate Democratic aide said, Theres a strong sentiment that the current situation is untenable and can only be fixed by her leaving. Theres too much water under the bridge for her to be a neutral arbiter.Another Democratic senator who supports Clinton said Wasserman Schultz will hurt her chances of rallying the liberal base in the fall.
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/281147-dems-discuss-dropping-wasserman-schultz
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,843 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)His group is behind her being in power. Seems they really, really like her.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,843 posts)Baobab
(4,667 posts)They should redo big chunks of these primaries. Every one where there were problems voting.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)You should have done it as soon as you saw the debate schedule. And, the longer you wait, the less it's going to help with party unity. But, you guys on Capitol Hill are the pros. You know that better than I do.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)endorsed her. Getting rid of her from Congress will be up to Canova and us.
Minimum donation is $1.
Democratic Underground for Tim Canova FL-23: https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/du4timcanova
MADem
(135,425 posts)(hard to know if they are the same person) are anonymous, the few who are quoted, and all the people saying "Cough-horseshit-cough" and speaking up for her are senior Democratic leaders who aren't afraid to be NAMED in the article.
Also, with regard to her tenure chairing the DNC, it's not up to "the Dems." It's up to "The POTUS." She is HIS representative at the DNC, he picked her, he named her to the gig, and he has actually ENDORSED her over Canova in her primary fight.
So.... what evs!
still_one
(92,552 posts)"Further down in the article, many Dem House and Senate members deny all of this"
What a hard hitting piece of journalism to create flame bait
MADem
(135,425 posts)The only time I've seen them "tone it down" a bit is when we have both chambers of Congress in our pockets. Otherwise, they pander to the right and snark at the left.
Burying the lede in that article (the actual lead being "Most Democrats, who are willing to be named, call this thesis utter horse shit!" is just one more example of their perfidy!
They just can't help it!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Unless we really want the party to be associated with payday lending and throwing cancer patients in prison for using medical marijuana.
I can't imagine why anyone else is so attached to her. She's a train wreck for our image.
MADem
(135,425 posts)She is not "harming our brand." The single-digit percentage of people who care about party leaders might care, but for most people, APIL--all politics is local.
If her constituents return her to the House, she'll be representing them like she always has. The odds are good, if she doesn't stay on at DNC, that she'll get a leadership position in the House.
Unless the voters don't count if they don't agree with you....?
FWIW, the POTUS has come out and endorsed her reelection, in the primary stages, too, so don't count on Obama handing her a pink slip.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)You think that's a good idea? Her popularity isn't exactly going up.
As for the rest of it, "local" doesn't mean what it meant in 1972. Widespread internet usage itself is about 4 years older than the people hitting voting age this cycle.
The last century was Newtonian, this one is Quantum.
So all politics is non-local, more like.
MADem
(135,425 posts)It's not up to "We the people."
It's down to "Them, the caucus."
Congressional leaders are chosen by ... surprise! Congressmen.
If she is returned to the legislature by her LOCAL (APIL) constituents, and she enjoys a leadership position, it will be because of the All Politics Is Local nature of the Democratic caucus in the House.
She has two constituencies to convince. And it has nothing to do with the "internet" or social media.
If that internet shit actually worked, Mitch McConnell would be out on his ear.
smh.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)You have demonstrated disappointing behavior in past months.
Do you support DWS on Usury? Supporting GOP candidates over Dems?
It sounds just like the divisive crap you've been peddling here recently. No surprise at all.
MADem
(135,425 posts)could certainly be categorized as "disappointing behavior," certainly. And calling me a shopper of "divisive crap" (I am a Democrat--a REGISTERED Democrat--who supports DEMOCRATS for elective office) takes the proverbial cake. "My way or the highway" is not a pathway to success, you see! It might have a little something to do with the reason why your candidate has crashed and "berned."
The irony is that you don't see that you are precisely that which you deride. You are intolerant to any POV under our great big Democratic tent save your own--that's not how Democrats behave. We're a big tent, and there are a lot of us -- at least three million more voters, that's for sure--who think like me.
That said, I'm not going to call you names or characterize you--you've done that to yourself, with your angry post directed at meeeeeeeeeee!
So, you have one of those REAL nice days, now!
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)It's when you are obnoxious, and shitty that i am speaking of. That's what is disappointing. I remember when you were not either of those.
But hey, be unpleasant if that's what you want. It's your credibility that is at stake, not mine.
MADem
(135,425 posts)More name calling from you ... "disappointing." Again, because I don't support your favored candidate.
"Unpleasant," too. Because your candidate isn't my favorite. You'd find me impossibly pleasant were I cheering for Bernie.
Who's being "obnoxious, shitty, disappointing and unpleasant, with no credibility" here?
I suppose it's all down to perspective, isn't it? Keep digging, if you must. You're giving everyone a grand view.
Gore1FL
47. No.. not because you disagree. That's fine
View profile
It's when you are obnoxious, and shitty that i am speaking of. That's what is disappointing. I remember when you were not either of those.
But hey, be unpleasant if that's what you want. It's your credibility that is at stake, not mine.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)You are behaving badly. There is nothing more or nothing less. Because of your choice to act this way, you are losing credibility.
I am sorry you choose to behave in the way you do.
MADem
(135,425 posts)You're the one calling me names in this conversation, which makes me wonder why you "choose" to continue to dig that big old hole!
I am sorry you choose to behave in the way you do.
Gore1FL
52. You are acting that way, yes. It has nothing to do with your candidate.
View profile
You are behaving badly. There is nothing more or nothing less. Because of your choice to act this way, you are losing credibility.
I am sorry you choose to behave in the way you do.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Probably to alert troll, but that is speculation on my part.
In any event, I hope you get over whatever it is that makes you behave so badly as of late.
MADem
(135,425 posts)55. As I pointed out, you choose to be uncivil.
View profile
Probably to alert troll, but that is speculation on my part.
In any event, I hope you get over whatever it is that makes you behave so badly as of late.
Everyone can see who the "uncivil" one is in this exchange.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Thanks for proving my point.
I recommend eating the first two billy goats and ignoring the third.
MADem
(135,425 posts)see who is being uncivil.
57. So I see you are intent on prolonging this, thereby proving my point.
View profile
Thanks for proving my point.
I recommend eating the first two billy goats and ignoring the third.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)I am sorry if you consider me defining your recent activity on DU as being an "uncivil" activity. Perhaps the best solution would you to not act horribly in the first place.
MADem
(135,425 posts)59. Yes they can
I am sorry if you consider me defining your recent activity on DU as being an "uncivil" activity. Perhaps the best solution would you to not act horribly in the first place.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)I am not the one here with the deep decline in interpersonal skills.
MADem
(135,425 posts)75. Don't need to
I am not the one here with the deep decline in interpersonal skills.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)It's sad you are unwilling to acknowledge or change your destructive behaviors.
Maybe some day you'll not be so angry, emma.
MADem
(135,425 posts)because I think you have some serious issues.
87. No. You have demonstrably been a poor member of this board.
It's sad you are unwilling to acknowledge or change your destructive behaviors.
Maybe some day you'll not be so angry, emma.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)The MAD part is obvious.
MADem
(135,425 posts)on your own, if you can manage it.
91. I just figured thats what the "em" in you handle stood for.
View profile
The MAD part is obvious.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)I am describing your disruptive behavior.
It's a pity. Disruptive behavior makes DU suck. I am not sure why you are so intent on doing that.
Please stop disrupting and be a good citizen of this discussion board. It's really not that much to ask.
MADem
(135,425 posts)100. If you consider your handle a personal insult, you shouldn't have chosen it.
I am describing your disruptive behavior.
It's a pity. Disruptive behavior makes DU suck. I am not sure why you are so intent on doing that.
Please stop disrupting and be a good citizen of this discussion board. It's really not that much to ask.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)I have been begging you for multiple posts to discontinue your efforts to make DU suck. Yet, at this point, that is clearly your mission.
I hope you are able to fill that empty void that is causing your anti-social behavior with something more fruitful than being hateful. In the mean time, please try to practice being a decent contributor to this discussion board. There are a lot of things that can make DU suck. We don't need anti-social behavior out of you to add to the list.
MADem
(135,425 posts)103. It's a shame that you feel the need to reduce yourself to parrot everything I say.
I have been begging you for multiple posts to discontinue your efforts to make DU suck. Yet, at this point, that is clearly your mission.
I hope you are able to fill that empty void that is causing your anti-social behavior with something more fruitful than being hateful. In the mean time, please try to practice being a decent contributor to this discussion board. There are a lot of things that can make DU suck. We don't need anti-social behavior out of you to add to the list.
You have the power.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)106. If I did that with your posts I'd have to buy a bigger hard drive. Please don't make DU suck nt
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)It's astounding that you cannot take reasonable advice but would rather turn it into this. But hey. Maybe by keeping you busy here, you won't have time to shit like this elsewhere on DU.
MADem
(135,425 posts)111. Polly want a cracker?
It's astounding that you cannot take reasonable advice but would rather turn it into this. But hey. Maybe by keeping you busy here, you won't have time to shit like this elsewhere on DU.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)You could probably find better uses of your time than being a shitty member here. One possibility would be being a good member of DU.
MADem
(135,425 posts)117. You are repeating titles and otherwise acting like a 12-year-old.
You could probably find better uses of your time than being a shitty member here. One possibility would be being a good member of DU.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Most people accept correction. You clearly value disrupting DU over anything else.
Surly? No. I just get frustrated having to correct a person who cannot behave like an adult.
MADem
(135,425 posts)120. You clearly require that approach
Most people accept correction. You clearly value disrupting DU over anything else.
Surly? No. I just get frustrated having to correct a person who cannot behave like an adult.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Do you perhaps still live with mommy or daddy? You don't strike me as someone who would keep a job long.
MADem
(135,425 posts)124. Yeah. I am frustrated when I have to deal with children and those that act like it.
Do you perhaps still live with mommy or daddy? You don't strike me as someone who would keep a job long.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)I'm running out of ideas. You repeat posts over an over. Add no value. And clearly live up to and surpass every criticism I have of you.
Why does making DU suck thrill you so?
MADem
(135,425 posts)126. Yeah. I am trying to come up with a reason you are such a horrible, trolling, member here
I'm running out of ideas. You repeat posts over an over. Add no value. And clearly live up to and surpass every criticism I have of you.
Why does making DU suck thrill you so?
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)It's tragic that your whole life is apparently dedicated to being a internet personality who trolls liberal sites.
When you shit on DU, I am going to call it out when I see it.
MADem
(135,425 posts)130. I am defining you. You don't take correction. You only shit here.
It's tragic that your whole life is apparently dedicated to being a internet personality who trolls liberal sites.
When you shit on DU, I am going to call it out when I see it.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)But I guess the juries can read.
MADem
(135,425 posts)132. You've probably alerted on every one.
But I guess the juries can read.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)134. Of course I would assume it. You have shown your colors here. Quit shitting on DU.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)That's a pretty shitty way of thinking, especially for a Democrat.
Quit shitting on DU.
MADem
(135,425 posts)136. I was a donor for years. But is your argument really only those with money have a voice?
View profile
That's a pretty shitty way of thinking, especially for a Democrat.
Quit shitting on DU.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)I think you are in the wrong party with that attitude.
MADem
(135,425 posts)141. You are plainly arguing that $$$ = Speech
I think you are in the wrong party with that attitude.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Your argument is you won't stop shitting on DU until I raise enough money to make you.
What other dubious SCOTUS decisions do you support?
MADem
(135,425 posts)145. No, more reporting.
Your argument is you won't stop shitting on DU until I raise enough money to make you.
What other dubious SCOTUS decisions do you support?
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)149. It would be a much better decision for you to simply behave decently. n/t
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)I only call out people who shit on DU. Like you do.
I wish you would stop.
MADem
(135,425 posts)154. I do behave decently.
I only call out people who shit on DU. Like you do.
I wish you would stop.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Please stop shitting on DU.
MADem
(135,425 posts)158. I am describing how you act. If you find that insulting. Quit acting that way.
Please stop shitting on DU.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)161. Me asking someone to not shit on DU sure is uncivil! nt
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)188. Please try to be a good user of this message board. nt
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)It's too bad that it's done by you spamming rather than having an intelligent conversation on the matter.
MADem
(135,425 posts)195. Thank you for bumping the anti DWS thread.
It's too bad that it's done by you spamming rather than having an intelligent conversation on the matter.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)You spamming is another example of your problematic behavior here.
MADem
(135,425 posts)199. Please be a good member of DU.
View profile
You spamming is another example of your problematic behavior here.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)203. Please stop making DU suck nt
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Your pretty funny when confronted on your poor behavior.
At this point, it's clear that I've soundly won the argument.
MADem
(135,425 posts)208. I am glad you are archiving all of this. I am sending people here to see your meltdown.
Your pretty funny when confronted on your poor behavior.
At this point, it's clear that I've soundly won the argument.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)211. Spam is a violation of TOS. Please stop making DU suck. nt
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)216. Thanks for proving my point. nt
Thanks for taking Mr. bluster to the wood shed. Insufferable.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Not sure why he/she thinks shitting on DU is such a great thing.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Quit shitting on DU.
MADem
(135,425 posts)137. Yes it is.
Quit shitting on DU.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)You are posting on the wrong board.
Of course you only come here to shit on people and otherwise behave badly.
MADem
(135,425 posts)140. It's telling that you think money = speech
You are posting on the wrong board.
Of course you only come here to shit on people and otherwise behave badly.
Response to MADem (Reply #142)
Post removed
MADem
(135,425 posts)144. I think you need to stop espousing RW views on DU
If you have to shit somewhere on the internet. Do it elsewhere and try to post like a grown up here. You may want to espouse liberal views now and again to fit in.
You $$$ = speech argument doesn't fly here.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)It really should not take that much effort on my part for you to be a good citizen here.
MADem
(135,425 posts)148. You said you wouldn't listen to me telling you to act civilly unless I donates or owned DU.
It really should not take that much effort on my part for you to be a good citizen here.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Please stop shitting on DU.
MADem
(135,425 posts)151. then your writing skills leave something to be desired too.
Please stop shitting on DU.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Either you are a liar or your words are poorly chosen. Which is it?
MADem
(135,425 posts)155. Apparently not. You deny what your writing says.
Either you are a liar or your words are poorly chosen. Which is it?
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)You'll only be a good citizen if I own the place.
You admitted to being a bad citizen. You took up a right wing talking point and equated speech to money. Now somehow this is my fault?
I guess delusional is an option besides liar or bad communicator.
MADem
(135,425 posts)160. In reality, you accidently let the truth slip out in the subtext.
You'll only be a good citizen if I own the place.
You admitted to being a bad citizen. You took up a right wing talking point and equated speech to money. Now somehow this is my fault?
I guess delusional is an option besides liar or bad communicator.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)163. So then you lied? nt
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)First you said you'd only listen to me if I owned DU. Now you say your wouldn't.
Those are mutually exclusive claims.
Why are you so driven to shit on DU?
MADem
(135,425 posts)165. You lied, and now you are lying about me.
First you said you'd only listen to me if I owned DU. Now you say your wouldn't.
Those are mutually exclusive claims.
Why are you so driven to shit on DU?
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Shitting on DU must men a lot considering how much time you are spending bumping a thread you aren't happy about.
You should probably learn to be a civil citizen of this message board.
Don't make DU suck.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Who's spending time writing hateful posts? Look in your mirror.
167. hate-filled another lie.
Shitting on DU must men a lot considering how much time you are spending bumping a thread you aren't happy about.
You should probably learn to be a civil citizen of this message board.
Don't make DU suck.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Your behavior makes DU suck.
Please change and be a good member here.
MADem
(135,425 posts)173. I don't hate you. I hate your behavior
Your behavior makes DU suck.
Please change and be a good member here.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)When you don't, you make DU suck. Please quit trying to make DU suck.
MADem
(135,425 posts)177. Please learn how to behave like a civil adult.
When you don't, you make DU suck. Please quit trying to make DU suck.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)181. Please stop making DU suck nt
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)183. Please stop making DU suck nt
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)185. Please quit disrupting DU. Be a good citizen.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Nonetheless thanks for bumping the DWS thread.
MADem
(135,425 posts)187. Please learn to work well with others. Your disruption of this site is saddening. nt
Nonetheless thanks for bumping the DWS thread.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)190. Be kind. nt
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Be a good DU citizen.
MADem
(135,425 posts)194. Gosh that's a damning post...
Be a good DU citizen.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Quit making DU suck, please.
MADem
(135,425 posts)198. Spamming makes DU suck
Quit making DU suck, please.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)202. Please stop making DU suck nt
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)I wish you were a better loser.
MADem
(135,425 posts)206. I accept your concession.
I wish you were a better loser.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)The owners of the site made the rules. They have the money that you think gives them speech.
MADem
(135,425 posts)210. Spamming is a violation of TOS. You really should try to follow the rules.
The owners of the site made the rules. They have the money that you think gives them speech.
MADem
(135,425 posts)213. K&R nt
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Response to Gore1FL (Reply #217)
Post removed
bvf
(6,604 posts)A real shame, too. Such an intellect, that one.
Seriously, great job, Gore1FL. That's stamina.
Response to MADem (Reply #104)
silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)He lives for that shit.
That, and always getting the last word.
Logical
(22,457 posts)CrispyQ
(36,582 posts)But I hope she gets the boot.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Talking about it is not enough.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)I would laugh my ass off if she stepped down. That would show me that the dem party knows they screwed the pooch on this one.
Just in case
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=screwed%20the%20pooch
LonePirate
(13,448 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)First we vote her out.
Then she gets a cabinet post.
hmmm maybe we missed something -- Basically she is a Repub. Maybe Transportation is OK. I'd rather she did something in Florida.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)Response to octoberlib (Original post)
Iggo This message was self-deleted by its author.
Iggo
(47,603 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Time to flush the ol' chamber pot and be done with it
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)making any real changes to the party. She probably made a deal long ago to be the fall guy as long as she gets a plush job after she leaves.
MADem
(135,425 posts)21. She should go, but they will use her as an escape goat to keep from
making any real changes to the party. She probably made a deal long ago to be the fall guy as long as she gets a plush job after she leaves.
Jackilope
(819 posts)Even if getting a symbolic boot, this doesn't even scratch the surface and the corruption and rot of DNC and Democratic party.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Stinky The Clown
(67,849 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)And go, Tim Canova!!
OldRedneck
(1,397 posts)Howard Dean and the 50 State Strategy.
Iggo
(47,603 posts)As opposed to DWS's strategy.
tazkcmo
(7,306 posts)What president needs SS protection when DWS is next in line?
MADem
(135,425 posts)Assassination jokes just aren't cool.
smh.
tazkcmo
(7,306 posts)They can lock me up. I'm fine with retirement.
ohnoyoudidnt
(1,858 posts)Jokes about how safe a president would be if they picked a certain VP are quite common. Famous comedians have said them many times. It's nothing that merits a SS investigation.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Lol, google showed me this. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2811078
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)there there
MADem
(135,425 posts)61. We'll get you a fainting couch.
View profile
there there
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Maybe you should stop acting melodramatic while you stop acting in the other poor ways we discussed already.
MADem
(135,425 posts)69. You hate being called out on your melodramatics, too?
View profile
Maybe you should stop acting melodramatic while you stop acting in the other poor ways we discussed already.
Who's "melodramatic" now?
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)I hope that one day you will find a way to be a decent citizen on DU again. Until then, if I see you post in a way that makes DU suck, I'll respond.
Try to work on your behavior problems so that doesn't happen.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I hope that one day you will find a way to be a decent citizen on DU again. Until then, if I see you post in a way that makes DU suck, I'll respond.
Try to work on your behavior problems so that doesn't happen.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)I am not the one with DU etiquette problems. That would be you. Please improve.
MADem
(135,425 posts)79. I don't need to take my own advice.
I am not the one with DU etiquette problems. That would be you. Please improve.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)I hope some day you learn to be a good citizen at DU.
MADem
(135,425 posts)81. It's weird that you feel the need to keep responding. It supports my hypothesis.
I hope some day you learn to be a good citizen at DU.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)But Mine seems to be spot on, Emma.
MADem
(135,425 posts)83. You never stated a hypothesis
View profile
But Mine seems to be spot on, Emma.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)85. Yes I did, emma. nt
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)"..." is a waste of bandwidth, emma.
MADem
(135,425 posts)88. Wasting bandwidth makes DU suck
"..." is a waste of bandwidth, emma.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)92. My name isn't Emma, nor does my handle imply it. nt
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)But hey. If you'd like to keep trying, be my guest. It just provides people with a lot of examples of your efforts to disrupt and make DU suck.
That's a shame, You once were a pretty decent poster. Now you come here to shit on the board and antagonize.
I hope your offline personality isn't as flawed as what you display online.
Please stop making DU suck with your antics.
MADem
(135,425 posts)94. Despite your practice here, you aren't very good at alert-trolling.
But hey. If you'd like to keep trying, be my guest. It just provides people with a lot of examples of your efforts to disrupt and make DU suck.
That's a shame, You once were a pretty decent poster. Now you come here to shit on the board and antagonize.
I hope your offline personality isn't as flawed as what you display online.
Please stop making DU suck with your antics.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Quit making DU suck.
MADem
(135,425 posts)96. No. I called you out for being disruptive.
Quit making DU suck.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)It's not an unreasonable request to ask you to respect this board.
MADem
(135,425 posts)99. Why is it so difficult for you be civil?
It's not an unreasonable request to ask you to respect this board.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Quit making DU suck.
MADem
(135,425 posts)107. Polly want a cracker?
Quit making DU suck.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Polly want a cracker?
MADem
(135,425 posts)110. I do by calliung out people that do.
Polly want a cracker?
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)I am not ashamed to call out DU-wreckers. Why would I delete this?
MADem
(135,425 posts)115. I won't be deleting anything I post
View profile
I am not ashamed to call out DU-wreckers. Why would I delete this?
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)I do congratulate you getting past MIRT.
MADem
(135,425 posts)121. I don't wreck DU for anyone but the disrupting members I confront.
I do congratulate you getting past MIRT.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)168. They get rid of disruptive trolls bent on making DU suck, right? nt
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Again, you have my congratulations.
And thanks for bumping the anti-DWS thread.
MADem
(135,425 posts)170. That's my understanding.
Again, you have my congratulations.
And thanks for bumping the anti-DWS thread.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Congratulations on getting away with that. It's quite an accomplishment considering how much joy you take in making DU suck.
MADem
(135,425 posts)176. It's irrelevant. The important thing is that you have not yet been banned for being disruptive.
Congratulations on getting away with that. It's quite an accomplishment considering how much joy you take in making DU suck.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Jim Beard
(2,535 posts)I had one encounter with he, she or it and it was not pleasant. I also wonder.
Logical
(22,457 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Logical
66. Wow,my oh fucking love to whine and be dramatic. Nt
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)A subtle difference, perhaps, but a difference nonetheless.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Oh wait,...Hillary supporters don't WANT the support of Bernie supporters.
They're traitors.
Right?
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)That will take action on Hillary's part. She better do a good job if she expects those votes.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)And we need to get tough on menaces to public safety like this lady derp derp
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)A solution to all your problems...
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #28)
silvershadow This message was self-deleted by its author.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)K&R
Scientific
(314 posts)DWS has demonstrated that she's just not up for this job. Time for a change.
dubyadiprecession
(5,740 posts)Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Seriously, Google is an awesome resource. It is possible to support HRC and still be able to acknowledge that DWS is bad at her job(s).
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Seriously,
I don't see how (or why) anyone is still defending her.
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)People are defending her here because she supports HRC. Many people cannot, apparently, find their way to criticize the wrong-doing of their candidate and those that support them. The defense and denials are disturbing. Apparently "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" is about as deep into logic as some can get.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)the measure in the house of representatives that told the DOJ and DEA to respect state medical marijuana laws and stop putting patients in prison.
http://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/on-medical-marijuana-debbie-wasserman-schultz-sounds-like-a-republican-6544176
Gore1FL
(21,185 posts)Thanks for the link!
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)... Go back to school and be somebody.
840high
(17,196 posts)Hillary's lackey.
davidthegnome
(2,983 posts)I don't think it's going to happen soon enough to matter in the upcoming election though. As long as Schultz has the support of the President, I suspect she'll stay where she is, unfortunately. No, Schultz cannot (and absolutely should not) be expected to behave as a neutral arbiter, the very notion is ridiculous. I do not feel that Schultz has served the party well. Supporting Clinton personally is one thing - and I have no issues with that. However, her service leaves much to be desired. Somehow we have a DNC chair who is supporting despicable predatory lending practices and institutions, which, alone, should be enough to tell us she needs to go.
There is also the matter of her utter lack of success as a DNC chair, given the party's rather severe losses in the recent past, also given the very real threat of a split - thanks, in part, to the corporate wing of the democratic party.
Clinton WILL have trouble rallying part of the liberal base - but Schultz is only one of the reasons why. I don't think that getting rid of her would do much to help her campaign in any event, it might actually be counter-productive as some would see it as a betrayal of a loyal (to Clinton, at least) ally.
All that said, there isn't much of a contest anymore. Unless some kind of absolute disaster or miracle takes place, Clinton will be the nominee to face Trump in the general. Despite my misgivings, I will do what I can to help get out the vote for our democratic nominee - as should we all. Trump winning would be a disaster of truly epic proportions.