General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow many deaths caused by the US since WWII?
The question came up, in another thread about the current war mongering in the media, about how many people the US or Russia has killed or caused the death of since WWII. I asked it. Honestly, considering its treatment of German prisoners shortly after WWII, I suspect Russia has killed more, but I asked this question to get people here on DU to just think about what our country, our military has been responsible for in our lifetimes.
I did not get a straight answer, probably because Russia was thrown in and so many people here see Russia as being nothing but a pariah state. One person tried to extend the timeline further back to make Russia be more blood thirsty, but failed to include deaths caused against American Indians or enslaved Africans in the US total. I never got a straight or accurate answer.
So, OK, FORGET Russia. Just lets consider our own actions -- how many people has the USA killed or caused the death of since WWII?
Sadly, I think its telling that some posters here won't give a straight answer but instead fall back on moral relativism saying other countries are worse. And, please, I am not anti-American, I am though strongly anti-war.
So -- How many people has the US killed or caused the death of since WWII?
Socal31
(2,484 posts)nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)Here's one page that claims to know:
The United States Has Killed At Least 8 Million People
In The Last 50 Years For The Greedy Capitalistic
Corporate Profits Controlled By The 1% Oligarchy
( Source: Philip Bradbury, Insight Magazine, November 2001 )
http://www.peaceonearth.net/8million.htm
Here's a flash animated page documenting drone strikes just in Pakistan since 2003 - notice what happened in 2009.
http://drones.pitchinteractive.com
Great posts btw- to think that Russia is the problem now is beyond absurd, when the US has been bombing, invading and causing mayhem all over the place since the '50s. Some people will tell you with a straight face that the Big Bad Russkies actually invaded Crimea and stole it. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so sad. What was left of the anti-war left has basically disappeared.
a la izquierda
(11,803 posts)and financed by the US.
If it's the latter, we're talking millions.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)The United States wasn't fighting the Cold War all by itself.
uawchild
(2,208 posts)The Iraq war wasn't part of the cold war, people are still dying there.
To say "yes, our military killed THIS many people, but for a good reason" is one thing, but it seems many people are reluctant to even acknowledge the number dead.
Case in point, how many people do you think the US has killed since WWII?
baldguy
(36,649 posts)By concentrating on the number of people killed.
Why not ask "How many people have our enemies killed since WWII?", since it's really the same question.
uawchild
(2,208 posts)Please don't drag the discussion down to personal attacks and "characterizations" of other posters like you just did here.
"You're trying to characterize everything that the US has done since 1945 in a negative light By concentrating on the number of people killed. " Um, no, I am trying to get people to take a moment and reflect on the number of people the US has killed since WWII. Its something many Americans seem unable or unwilling to do.
Some people seem unable to even just say the number that they think is accurate, and, honestly, your avoidance of providing your own estimate of those deaths along with any rational for them you feel is valid just serves to make my point for me.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)uawchild
(2,208 posts)Why is it so hard for you to answer this question?
Take your time. No need to rush your response, but let me politely ask you again, how many people do you think the US has killed since WWII? Feel free to justify any of those you feel inclined to.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)Let's say you are right, and the whole point of this type of discussion is to prove "America BAD!". Does that mean you get to argue that "America GOOD!" without any honest recognition of our history, without any intellectual honesty? It takes serious blinders to do that, and it represents the worst of U.S. exceptionalism. Is there no in between?
Wouldn't it serve America** better to recognize and acknowledge where our policies and military action have made things worse for certain people or nations so we can learn from it and be a better force in the world as we move forward? Because as long as we keep our national(ist) blinders on we can never do that. As they say, history repeats...
**I asterisked 'America' because America is actually 2 continents and many countries, not just the US, and that is another thing that needs to be recognized, acknowledged and altered in our language. Yet another sign of U.S. exceptionalism.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)uawchild
(2,208 posts)but then I wrote it. lol
Sorry, but I can't help but seem to think you are reluctant to actually answer the question asked. Is the number of deaths too large perhaps?
But you made a good suggestion, lets all please re-read my original post at the start of this thread, I think it made some good points.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)You didn't even respond to a thing I said. You've made my point for me. Not gonna waste more time with this subthread.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Seriously! That's a right-wing talking point.
Saying that our enemies made us do it is not a legitimate or honest answer.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)The OP seems to be parroting that line, not me.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)It's a legitimate question, and one that deserves serious discussions instead of ignorant redirects.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)How many murders were caused by presidents and congress is the correct question.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)It's just hard to wrap one's head around that many people getting killed, but it's the fucked up truth.
Fuck war and evil war profiteers.
By the way, we didn't exactly go easy on German prisoners of war ourselves.
EX500rider
(10,891 posts)Actually we did. Especially compared to Russian treatment of POW's. Most all US POWs made it home to Germany.
Of the almost 100,000 Germans of the 6th Army who surrendered at Stalingrad, only about 6,000 made it home alive. So about 95% of them died in captivity.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)and there is this--
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Other_Losses
EX500rider
(10,891 posts)misuses documents
misreads documents
ignores contrary evidence
employs a statistical methodology that is hopelessly compromised
made no attempt to see the evidence he has gathered in relation to the broader situation
made no attempt to perform any comparative context
puts words into the mouths of the subjects of his oral history
ignores a readily available and absolutely critical source that decisively dealt with his central accusation
As a consequence of those and other shortcomings, the book "makes charges that are demonstrably absurd."[39] Panel member Stephen Ambrose later wrote in the New York Times:
Mr. Bacque is wrong on every major charge and nearly all his minor ones. Eisenhower was not a Hitler, he did not run death camps, German prisoners did not die by the hundreds of thousands, there was a severe food shortage in 1945, there was nothing sinister or secret about the "disarmed enemy forces" designation or about the column "other losses." Mr. Bacque's "missing million" were old men and young boys in the Volkssturm (People's Militia) released without formal discharge and transfers of POWs to other allies control areas. Maj. Ruediger Overmans of the German Office of Military History in Freiburg who wrote the final volume of the official German history of the war estimated that the total death by all causes of German prisoners in American hands could not have been greater than 56,000 approximately 1% of the over 5,000,000 German POWs in Allied hands exclusive of the Soviets. Eisenhower's calculations as to how many people he would be required to feed in occupied Germany in 1945-46 were too low and he had been asking for more food shipments since February 1945. He had badly underestimated the number of German soldiers surrendering to the Western Allies; more than five million, instead of the anticipated three million as German soldiers crossed the Elbe River to escape the Russians. So too with German civiliansabout 13 million altogether crossing the Elbe to escape the Russians, and the number of slave laborers and displaced persons liberated was almost 8 million instead of the 5 million expected. In short, Eisenhower faced shortages even before he learned that there were at least 17 million more people to feed in Germany than he had expected not to mention all of the other countries in war ravaged Europe, the Philippines, Okinawa and Japan. All Europe went on rations for the next three years, including Britain, until the food crisis was over.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)I found it trying to find another article that talked about the death of German POWs after the war in US camps. I'm not claiming Eisenhower killed German soldiers en masse on purpose, but there certainly was a lot of death.
If you do a google images search on "eisenhower+pow+camps"
The pictures are pretty horrific.
Akamai
(1,779 posts)Our history in the Middle East has probably caused millions of deaths there, I think, including our deep participation in the Iraq-Iran War, later sanctions against Iraq that made disease a killer of so many Iraqis -- including children, the War in Afghanistan (the Taliban offered to send Osama to a neutral country for trial if the Bush supplied evidence that Osama was culpable for 9-11 but Bush refused and started an unnecessary war), the unholy invasion of Iraq with hundreds of thousands killed by military action and it's destabilizing effects, etc., etc.
And certainly we brought unnecessary death to Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, etc.
I sure don't have the numbers in front of me, nor am I a historian, but the awful stink of death is on our hands.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)In 2009 a professor of international relations at Harvard, wrote: How many Muslims has the United States killed in the past thirty years, and how many Americans have been killed by Muslims? Coming up with a precise answer to this question is probably impossible, but it is also not necessary, because the rough numbers are so clearly lopsided. With actor Ben Affleck's words: Weve killed more Muslims than theyve killed us by an awful lot.
http://www.mintpressnews.com/do-the-math-global-war-on-terror-has-killed-4-million-muslims-or-more/208225/
Such math also get lopsided by their own calculations. The infamous Black Book of Communism counted almost any kind of death, and made them all a crime of Soviet. Later The Lancet made a study claiming that during the rapid privatization in the former Soviet Union during the early 1990s, life expectancy fells almost five years due to unemployment and alcoholism - mass murder by capitalism!
But back to the wars. If you just count direct war victims, you would minimize the long term effects. How many will die, because their only hospital is bombed. Water supply spoiled, diseases and hunger etc. Stop counting - just stop the wars!
uawchild
(2,208 posts)Thanks for adding to this discussion.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)frankieallen
(583 posts)Commander and chief after all.
uawchild
(2,208 posts)Our politicians are just the mirror of the American electorate. I think we as a nation are responsible for our country's actions, not just one man or a few generals.
frankieallen
(583 posts)For the decisions of one man. Nobody asked me if we should build drones and bomb people from the sky.
Politicians are motivated by power and greed, to blame the American electorate is bullshit, we're giving two choices every 4 years, and it doesn't matter apparently which douche we choose, people are going to die either way.
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)Was the US the aggressor in Vietnam and Korea? What about Afghanistan? Regardless of what people think about the fact that we still have troops in Afghanistan, the invasion following 9/11 was completely justified.
On edit, "caused" and "killed" are two separate concepts, correct?
CrispyQ
(36,573 posts)1945 to the Present
by William Blum
Z magazine , June 1999
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/US_Interventions_WBlumZ.html
The engine of American foreign policy has been fueled not by a devotion to any kind of morality, but rather by the necessity to serve other imperatives, which can be summarized as follows:
* making the world safe for American corporations;
* enhancing the financial statements of defense contractors at home who have contributed generously to members of congress;
* preventing the rise of any society that might serve as a successful example of an alternative to the capitalist model;
* extending political and economic hegemony over as wide an area as possible, as befits a "great power."
This in the name of fighting a supposed moral crusade against what cold warriors convinced themselves, and the American people, was the existence of an evil International Communist Conspiracy, which in fact never existed, evil or not.
The United States carried out extremely serious interventions into more than 70 nations in this period.
~much more at link: http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/US_Interventions_WBlumZ.html
Osama bin Laden said the American people should read the work of William Blum.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/20/AR2006012001971.html
ileus
(15,396 posts)uawchild
(2,208 posts)Is the answer perhaps not what you would expect? Honestly, why are so many posters avoiding answering this question? Embarrassment perhaps?
Who has killed or caused the death of more people since WWII, the US or Russia?
TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)Here. You got it. Happy now?
http://www.countercurrents.org/lucas240407.htm
- and yes, it is much more causalities than Soviet/Russia can be credited for.
For a more qualified view on war and peace, see this:
http://www.visionofhumanity.org/#page/indexes/global-peace-index/2015
You will never find a sober answer, since the numbers flex with world view. Some people can tell you, that the A-bombs thrown at Japan saved millions of lives. For the leaders of Japan they were just two more cities destroyed, and changed nothing in the view of the war... Etc!