General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmerica Could Have Dropped Big Oil Decades Ago -- What Happened?
http://www.alternet.org/environment/155861/america_could_have_dropped_big_oil_decades_ago_--_what_happened/_640x429_310x220
This story is not new. Today, solar energy is picking up momentum. But despite the current numbers and the recent raves, the solar saga, and that of renewable energy as a whole, has been going on for decades. It is a history of false starts and stutter steps.
First, the good news. According to the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), 2011 showed record-breaking numbers for U.S. solar installations. The industry's best year ever saw demand rise by 109 percent over the previous year. With tremendous incentives and benefits for homeowners, and as prices continue to decline, the future looks bright for this alternative energy source.
However a quick glance to the past throws harsh light on the fact that we've been at this precipice before. In 1978, the White House Council on Environmental Quality issued this glowing statement: "Our conclusion is that with a strong national commitment to accelerated solar development and use, it should be possible to derive a quarter of U.S. energy from solar by the year 2000. For the year 2020 and beyond, it is now possible to speak hopefully, and unblushingly, of the United States becoming a solar society."
The key words here being "strong national commitment," because just as timber, coal, oil, gas, and nuclear received enormously strong federal support, solar needs the same kind of government backing, which as of yet, the sector has not seen. The statement should instead read, We could become a solar society, if only we wanted to become a solar society.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)It's simply too bad that we didn't follow through on the recommendation of that White House Council. Instead we choose to build more weapons of war rather than address the root cause of what would lead us to the wars in which we found ourselves engaged.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Ronnie set us back 30 years.
^snip from previous link^
For Denis Hayes the transition of administrations was a time of great uncertainty. The biggest question was whom the president would choose as the Secretary of Energy. As a possible sign of Reagan's interest, or lack thereof, in the field of energy, this would be the last cabinet position he'd get around to selecting. As Hayes recalls, "he chose, apparently by throwing a dart at the wall, a guy named Jim Edwards, the former governor of South Carolina, a dentist by profession, to be Secretary of Energy." Edwards would replace Charles Duncan Jr., a former president of Coca-Cola.
Inside the halls of the Solar Institute in Golden, Colorado, the irony of a dentist replacing a soft drink executive was not lost on the aforementioned group of Noble-caliber scientists. Says Hayes; "It suggests something about the feeling of whether or not somebody needs to know anything about a fairly complicated field before you give them the [department's] highest office in the land." A former dentist was now calling the shots on whether the experiments and research undertaken by SERI's staff of distinguished scientists would ever see the light of day.
By June 1981, Dennis Hayes was out of a job; along with 370 of the gifted scientists and activists he had recruited. Reagan's distaste for all things solar was never more evident than by his dismantling of the solar panels Carter had placed atop the White House roof, but that display was only the beginning as the budget for solar development, along with subsidies and tax credits for the industry were slashed. With federal backing virtually wiped out overnight, young solar companies began to collapse and the industry as a whole was on the ropes.
Reducing the nation's reliance on foreign oil and fossil fuels, in general, would have seemed to have been in the U.S.'s interests. In order for this to happen, scientists and renewable advocates pushed for the same federal backing that all other energy sources received in their years of infancy, going all the way back to timber. Instead, the Reagan administration chose to double-down on fossil fuels and keep heaping enormous amounts of taxpayers' money in this direction. As an alternative to foreign oil, the new administration put its support behind, not renewables, but synthetic fuels.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)liberal N proud
(60,352 posts)the Reagan years.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Initech
(100,156 posts)clang1
(884 posts)Heh not dropped for the same reasons as our having no universal healthcare and why some Americans eat pinkslime for food.
4dsc
(5,787 posts)I wish you people would understand how solar produces electricity and oil greases the wheels that run our society.
clang1
(884 posts)Heh heh lol. Fossil fuels and electricity go hand in hand. Not sure your point. And yeah oil does grease the wheels of society.
4dsc
(5,787 posts)Fossil fuels and electricity are not one in the same energy sources. My point is simple too, you can have all the solar you want and it will replace very in the way of oil consumption.
mopinko
(70,395 posts)under the guise of opec.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)...and we are paying the price for it now.