Are the President's Education Policies Helping Our Kids?
http://www.alternet.org/story/155955/are_the_president%27s_education_policies_helping_our_kids/
_640x427_310x220
When Barack Obama ran for office in 2008, he did so on an education platform that was ambitious to say the least. Then-candidate Obama was clear that he aimed to reform Americas entire education system, from preschool on up through higher education -- and during his first term as president, his administration has indeed made significant changes to educational policy. But have those changes been for the better? Have schools, and their students, benefited from the Obama administrations educational maneuvers over this first term? As it turns out, the answer is: not necessarily.
***SNIP
1. Funding for Early Childhood Education
It is well-established that early childhood education is a crucial means of improving school readiness and performance among at-risk children. Studies show that preschool reduces high school dropout rates while increasing the likelihood that students will go on to higher education. Furthermore, early childhood education is a great investment: a 2005 MIT study found that every dollar spent on early childhood education reduces future social services expenditures by $13.
Given all that, Obamas 2008 campaign promises to invest extensively in early childhood education seemed like a no-brainer. And on the surface, he seems to have delivered: the administrations 2011 Race to the Top Early-Learning Challenge -- a $500 million grant competition that funds preschool programs like Head Start -- allocates a whopping 71 percent of 2011s $700 million Race to the Top funds to early education.
But the devil, as always, is in the details. Of the 37 states that submitted applications for assistance, only nine won funding: California, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island and Washington. The winning states were required to make a number of corporate-based reforms in order to compete for the preschool funding including committing to a set of accountability procedures provided by a privately managed preschool assessment agency called Quality Rating and Improvement Systems. QRIS heavily emphasizes things like classroom décor, teacher assessment and parent participation but even corporate reformer Sarah Mead of Bellwether Education Partners says, [T]heres not much evidence that creating QRIS will produce any significant improvements in childrens readiness to learn
The research that does exist is not encouraging: A study
by researchers at the RAND Corporation found little to no evidence of a relationship between childcare programs
.ratings and
outcomes.