General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLogic Question
What do you call a situation when you come to a conclusion that ignores all contradictory evidence? In other words, the conclusion doesn't match the evidence? I can't think of the term.
Please help me.
sadbear
(4,340 posts)iemitsu
(3,888 posts)Make7
(8,543 posts)petronius
(26,614 posts)But I think 'being a republican' is the best answer...
no_hypocrisy
(46,331 posts)what I was thinking about.
Thank you!
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)SoutherDem
(2,307 posts)I was going to say Republicanism but I felt you were looking for a real answer.
wandy
(3,539 posts)dimbear
(6,271 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)Take your pick:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
postulater
(5,075 posts)co·nun·drum (k-nndrm)
n.
1. A riddle in which a fanciful question is answered by a pun.
2. A paradoxical, insoluble, or difficult problem; a dilemma: "the conundrum, thus far unanswered, of achieving full employment without inflation" (Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.)
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/conundrum
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)meow2u3
(24,779 posts)Delusion and insanity are prerequisites for membership. Just ask Lincoln Chafee and other ex-repukes turned independent.