General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf SCOTUS declares people cannot constitutionally be forced to buy insurance,
why then can people be drafted into the military? Both are potentially making people to do something they might not want to do. Both ignore individual choice for the benefit of the whole. Both are mandates Congress can demand people to follow.
Drale
(7,932 posts)that state laws requiring people to have car insurance be negated?
Sgent
(5,857 posts)There is no one claiming that states cannot require the purchase of insurance, but rather if the federal government can. MA residents will still have to buy private insurance even if the ACA is repealed.
enough
(13,272 posts)Not a "mandate" in the same way.
kudzu22
(1,273 posts)the states are. Completely different issue.
spanone
(135,952 posts)nanabugg
(2,198 posts)annabanana
(52,791 posts)If you're not carrying a mortgage, I'm not sure.
littlewolf
(3,813 posts)then it is your property and you can do
what you want with it ....
littlewolf
(3,813 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)MineralMan
(146,354 posts)If you own your structure outright, you do not have to buy flood insurance. That's a fact that many have regretted who lost their home in a flood.
The lenders require you to purchase it, not the government.
Dokkie
(1,688 posts)you can receive sex change and be female and avoid getting drafted. Sucks for the guys but good for gals
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)They're allowed to serve in the military, ergo they would be drafted.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)kudzu22
(1,273 posts)and is therefore constitutional. The question with ACA has to do with another enumerated power -- the power to regulate commerce among the several states. Does that power extend to the ability to compel commerce by individuals? We'll find out soon.
bakpakr
(168 posts)If you choose not to purchase Health Insurance you must pay a penalty. That is all that is says. I personally think calling it a penalty is wrong. What it should be called is an Offset Fee. It is paid to help ensure there are enough funds available to reimburse providers through tax programs that are paid to providers.
What should have been added to the law is that if you choose not to purchase Health Insurance and do not wish to pay the penalty then you can choose to fill out and carry at all times documentation and proof that you have the funds to pay for care readily available then you get care. If funds are not available then you receive no care.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)The penalty is jail.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)which is NOT ENFORCEABLE, with a draft? Seriously?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)in the Constitution...
FAIL
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)"To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years"
Please show me in the constitution where the fed has the authority to force me to buy a private for profit product or be fined.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Show me where it says the government can give money to private religious schools.
Show me where it says that the President can declare a war.
The Congress has the ability to legislate interstate commerce. Health care crosses state boundaries.
Treatment for illness is not a commodity.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The government has the right to tax. The mandate has nothing to do with taxes. If the administration expanded medicare we would not be having this issue right now. That is not what they have done.
In this instance they are not regulating commerce. They are creating commerce in order to regulate it.