General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUK Guardian: Roberts defection to the liberal wing on ACA will "sink the US conservative movement
into deep gloom."it appears that John Roberts joined the liberal wing in upholding the healthcare law and individual mandate. This is significant in itself and news that will sink the US conservative movement into deep gloom.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/jun/28/supreme-court-ruling-health-care-live?newsfeed=true
It will be interesting to see how republicans and teabaggers react to Roberts joining the "liberal wing" on such an important case.
barbtries
(28,824 posts)into oblivion. deep gloom is not enough.
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)flamingdem
(39,342 posts)the Guardian is being too logical, sadly the wingnuts still have some life left in em.
liberal N proud
(60,352 posts)The conservative movement is extreme and needs to be stopped.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,088 posts)nt.
rurallib
(62,491 posts)But, damn it would be funny if he did switch.
Be just like Earl Warren and Eisenhower.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)I guess aleato has some fucking heartburn. Hey Grimace, Thomas and Scalia how does it feel to have your face wiped with our asses?
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,088 posts)Take care.
Rust never sleeps.
Best not be complacent over this ruling.
NYC Liberal
(20,139 posts)Rambis
(7,774 posts)I don't know if it is but they have been feeding the working people of the world this load of BS for 30 years. Backlash!
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)It was written by and for the insurance industry, they said so themselves in the paper years ago.
Don't people here read the newspaper? Aren't people here familiar with what liberal means?
What universal health care means?
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)The corporatist wing lost to the radical authoritarian, mercantilist wing on this issue.
unblock
(52,511 posts)yes, this is a right-wing law.
however, there's nothing unconstitutional about it.
and calling the 4 center-left justices the "radical authoritarian wing" is absolute nonsense.
had they called it a "tax, payable to the treasury via the irs, coupled with a 100% offsetting credit if you have qualifying health insurance or any of a few other exemptions" no one would have doubted its constitutionality for one second.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)The corporatists wanted this, in both parties. Of course it was upheld.
They have managed to entrench the bloodsucking corporate middlemen into our health care system; ensured that not a single American, from birth to death, will be able to avoid them; and killed the possibility of actual affordable health care.
It was a slick bipartisan scam, and we are the ones who will pay.