Maybe he judged the case on its merits.

I'm just glad he ruled in the right direction.

Motives matter...but sometimes you should just say, in this case...whew!

They would have upheld the PPACA on commerce clause grounds, which Roberts rejected.

The only way to get a majority was for them to agree to the tax argument (the only ground the Chief would accept).

Scalia is very very unhappy too

Koch Bros have a new anti-Obamacare project. Be sure to contribute to spread the word.

URGENT: Patriot, Turn Your ObamaCare Anger into Action!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002879153

So do you.

Roberts vote is an outlier. I have no clue why he voted with Justice Ginsberg.

All the rest of conservatives and insurance cos want it gone. They recognize that Obamacare is putting us one step closer to single payer.

He would have taken Roger B. Taney's place in history had his court ruled incorrectly on this one, too.

A giant windfall for insurance corporations.

Makes sense to me. Scalia's little toddler tantrum was also a clue.

as to what is really going on here, then there really is no hope for us.

What a corporate scam.

Roberts never met a corporation he didn't like. Rocket science, it ain't.

So now people are trying to show off the penmanship on this contract with the devil and asking us to forget that we ever heard the story of Faust.

This time he did not vote with the right wingers.

I doubt there is a single DU'er who believes he has "changed" because of this vote.

and decided the case according to the Constitution.