Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSCOTUS sides with federal power
SCOTUS sides with federal power
By Greg Sargent
The Supreme Courts landmark decision upholding the individual mandate at the heart of Obamacare may be the start of a third great period in which the court has grappled with a question that continues to divide us as deeply as ever: What are the proper limits on federal power, and how far can the government go in protecting citizens from the depredations of the free market and social and technological change?
<...>
In the broadest possible sense, this can be seen as the start of a third era in which the Court wrestles with questions surrounding the expansion of federal power each era different from the other, says James OHara, a trustee of the Supreme Court Historical Society.
During the New Deal, Franklin Delano Roosevelt sought to expand the federal governments management of the economy to cope with the Great Depression. While the court initially dealt Roosevelt plenty of setbacks, the era as a whole can be seen as a ratification of Roosevelts broad contention that the crisis merited expansive federal intervension.
<...>
We are perhaps entering a third era, in which the court is pragmatically trying to assess the place of the federal government in a world of rapid technological and economic change, OHara said. The Obama administration has approached health care with broad, sweeping legislation, and the Supreme Court is willing pragmatically to say, `Lets give it a chance and see how it shakes down Constitutionally.
- more -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/scotus-sides-with-federal-power/2012/06/28/gJQAkEpB9V_blog.html
By Greg Sargent
The Supreme Courts landmark decision upholding the individual mandate at the heart of Obamacare may be the start of a third great period in which the court has grappled with a question that continues to divide us as deeply as ever: What are the proper limits on federal power, and how far can the government go in protecting citizens from the depredations of the free market and social and technological change?
<...>
In the broadest possible sense, this can be seen as the start of a third era in which the Court wrestles with questions surrounding the expansion of federal power each era different from the other, says James OHara, a trustee of the Supreme Court Historical Society.
During the New Deal, Franklin Delano Roosevelt sought to expand the federal governments management of the economy to cope with the Great Depression. While the court initially dealt Roosevelt plenty of setbacks, the era as a whole can be seen as a ratification of Roosevelts broad contention that the crisis merited expansive federal intervension.
<...>
We are perhaps entering a third era, in which the court is pragmatically trying to assess the place of the federal government in a world of rapid technological and economic change, OHara said. The Obama administration has approached health care with broad, sweeping legislation, and the Supreme Court is willing pragmatically to say, `Lets give it a chance and see how it shakes down Constitutionally.
- more -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/scotus-sides-with-federal-power/2012/06/28/gJQAkEpB9V_blog.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1030 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS sides with federal power (Original Post)
ProSense
Jun 2012
OP
I only see this as an expansion of corporate power, they got the fundamental thing
Uncle Joe
Jun 2012
#3
MADem
(135,425 posts)1. I don't look at it as "expansion" of federal power. It's a tax to achieve an end.
When the roads crumble, they fix 'em. When the power lines break, they fix 'em. When the municipal buildings leak and need repair, they fix 'em.
Tax money pays for these things.
Now, when the taxpayer needs a medical patch job, they'll fix 'em, too--and they'll use tax money to do it.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)2. The WP forgot about "Bush v. Gore"
...when SCOTUS sided with "federal power" to decide that the loser won.
How convenient of WP to "forget."
Uncle Joe
(58,584 posts)3. I only see this as an expansion of corporate power, they got the fundamental thing
that any private for profit business would want, government coercing the people to buy their product.
Thanks for the thread, ProSense.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)4. Exactly. nt
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)5. I don't see the expansion.
The constitutionality was already there in the way the the opinion was written. If the commerce clause was used it would have been an expansion.