General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCruel female objectification in the check-out line
Last edited Fri Jun 29, 2012, 09:41 PM - Edit history (1)
I object strenuously to the promotion of a lanky 14 year-old boy with breast implants as the only "correct" female body type. I object to it in Maxim. I object to it in Cosmo. But if people want to say, "This is beautiful," then that's their business whether I agree or not.
Where I draw the line, however, is the jubilant derision of those who fail to meet that ideal and, sad to say, that derision is generally offered up as entertainment for women.
Supermarket tabloids and some women's magazines feature round-ups of who is fat. "10 worst beach bodies!" exclaims the cover. There are arrows and close-ups to the offending fat. Horror is expressed that some actress had the nerve to step outdoors in such a condition. Needless to say, none of these women singled out for censure are morbidly obese. They typically have a little bit of a belly and enough flesh on their butt and thighs to cause some line, crease, dimple or bulge... some deviation from featurelessness.
Over the years I have spent a lot of time with cable news on in the background. Most viewers of daytime news are women and there is a certain kind of daytime "style" story that comes up occasionally, usually prefaced with, "The internet is abuzz about..."
It seems that some celebrity has had an unflattering picture taken.
A few years back there was a beach picture of Jennifer Love Hewitt with a big butt. It was, indeed, impressive. I found, as the story rolled around each hour, that I was liking the picture more and more. But they kept telling me it was the worst thing in recorded history.
Maybe so... but it was also rather sexy. The same body in tights, rather than a bikini that appears to have been made from discarded inner tubes, would break a few male necks as we swiveled to follow it down the street.
Do I need to seek counseling because my first impulse was not to stone this woman?
"My home-boys try to warn me..."
Yes, this is above Ms. Hewitt's usual weight as an actress and beauty-product spokes-model, but you don't have to be a deviant to find some appeal in the picture. It became a big media rhubarb, leading to this People story:
Anyway, today I find myself once again cast as a pervert outside all human norms, thanks to FindLaw, of all things. FindLaw inexplicably has a link to a DailyMail (UK tabloid) expose of Jersey Shore's J-Woww.
That's not a good look: Jersey Shore's JWoww steps out in very
unflattering see-through leggings to walk her dog
http://legalnews.findlaw.com/article/067f87S3w29c4?q=Jersey+Shore+(TV+series)
Bear in mind, this is how she dared dress to walk her dog. Not to speak to the UN... to walk her dog.
Now I ask, in all seriousness, how many heterosexual men glancing at this picture will have, as their initial reaction, "My god... how tragic! I must tear out my eyes."
Oops. Sorry wrong picture... here's the one I was looking for...
Oh, the humanity!
Seriously... WTF? This is J-Woww, a woman whose entire celebrity persona is as sexy over-ripe shore-trash. She is not the next Audrey Hepburn, and never has been.
I find J-Woww's body quite distasteful, but not from this angle. She has absurd breast implants... the kind one winces and turns away from. Really vulgar, deforming, grotesque instances of surgical mutilation.
But nobody complains about her front, which is actually inhuman. Bit I am informed that her backside (which seems pretty cute to me) is in egregiously poor taste to show-off, and one of the signs of the apocalypse.
"Becky, look at her butt. Gross. It's so... feminine."
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)bikini bottom that's the problem!
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,207 posts)The bikini bottom could have been cut better to wrap more around her butt, and it would have been a great look. There is nothing wrong with her body.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)"Absurditties"
Sorry, someone had to say it
In seriousness, I agree with this post 100%. I would also add the flip-side to this phenomenon: the demonizing of naturally-thin women as not "real".
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)anorexic or mindless slave to the patriarchy.
And I have heard many a female conversational reference to, "those skinny bitches," which hardly seems fair.
Fridays Child
(23,998 posts)Really? I find absolutely nothing wrong with, or overweight about, her body. She looks to be completely within a healthy weight range, to me.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)groups have different body shapes; for example, as my dear late mother often stated:
Irish lasses, they have no asses!
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)There is nothing unhealthy about that picture. I meant that she was heavy for Jennifer Love Hewitt.
I took your point and edited the OP accordingly.
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)I watch that new Bicardi Rum commercial with those pencil thin models cavorting around, pretending that this was the style. But all you have to do is take one look at Jayne Mansfield, or Ms. Monroe or any other actress from the pre 60's era and you see curves babt curves....
grntuscarora
(1,249 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
She found it on www.somedaymelissa.com, a site raising awareness about eating disorders.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)They could stand to gain a few pounds. Most of them are actually unhealthy and under weight. Really.
I would have posted sooner, but the scroll wheel on my mouse kept getting stuck. 3 times anyway. Or was it 6? I lost count.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)it's sickening all this tearing of people, particularly women, apart because a body part is a little too much this or a little too little of something else.
Men don't escape this, either. It's just not as often. Who hasn't seen the David Hasselhoff or Val Kilmer or Bruce Jenner pics?
malthaussen
(17,241 posts)... what do you expect?
I have my own idiosyncratic aesthetic, but I would never dream of imposing it on anyone else. But instead of the sane, simple adage that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder," we have fallen to "beauty is what WE tell you it is."
-- Mal
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)For example, if someone photoshopped the photo of that behind in accord with supposed standards, it would look so strange that they'd have to photoshop the rest of the body to match. And once you're down to a skeleton.....
I know some naturally thin people and they look good. I know some naturally heavy people, and they look good. It's all about health and fitness!
treestar
(82,383 posts)to "fix" all of the problems.
kentauros
(29,414 posts)they have figures. If Ms. Hewitt were a belly dancer, no one would question her small amount of fat.
Dash87
(3,220 posts)But if she looked like she was a second from starving to death, those magazines would say how great she looked.
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)Sorry, I think I tranced out and failed to actually read your post.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Very few. But straight men are not the target.
Those magazines target unhappy women who want to alternately hate themselves and hate other women. (Half the articles are "hate yourself" the other half are "hate this woman" with the occasional useless sex tips thrown in).
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)it is 'who' is in the bikini. If it's someone you love, respect and/or admire, how they look won't matter because they have meaning for you.
KG
(28,753 posts)UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)It doesn't turn me on at all.