Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UTUSN

(70,810 posts)
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 12:56 PM Jun 2012

"The 1991 Novel That Predicted Sarah Palin" - a piss poorly written review from Slate

The reviewer lurches along with his own writing and thinking and his apparent admiration of The Quitter from Wasilla (thanks, DUer for that coinage). Why is Joe McGINNISS' book about her "scurrilous"?!1



*************QUOTE*************

http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/books/2012/06/sarah_palin_ride_a_cockhorse_predicted_her_rise_to_power_in_1991_.html

[font size=5]The 1991 Novel That Predicted Sarah Palin[/font]
The freakish, fantastic prescience of Raymond Kennedy’s Ride a Cockhorse.

By James Parker

.... To summarize the plot rather crudely: Frankie Fitzgibbons is a demure and docile small-town New Englander, 45 years old, not long widowed, who one day goes bananas and begins to take over the world. I say “goes bananas,” but the first symptom of her disorder is a kind of bewildering (to others) supersanity: a fierce eloquence, a white-hot clarity of mind. It comes upon her suddenly, Pentecostally almost, while—in the course of her duties as home loan officer for the Parish Bank—she is on the phone with a woman who has been falling behind in her mortgage payments. “If you’re looking for a sympathetic ear,” snaps Mrs. Fitzgibbons, hitherto a reliable provider of just that, “you’re barking up the wrong tree.” Her new voice rings out, loud and muscular with cliché, turning heads, taking no crap. She has been reborn. “Remarkable as it might seem, with that one line, Mrs. Fitzgibbons put behind her years of futile, soft-soaping diplomacy.”

And so begins her reign of terror. Mrs. Fitzgibbons increases in confidence. She increases in personal magnetism. Out of nowhere she has a violently expansive corporate agenda. The slow-moving men in her way, the comfy old chauvinists, must be overwhelmed. She orders people about, amazes them. She initiates a wave of firings—some random, some vindictively personal. She makes enemies. She gathers acolytes. She becomes CEO of the Parish Bank, and in an interview with the local paper she lashingly disparages the bank’s competitors (“... local-yokel-operators ... I’m not going around them, I’m going to roll over them.”) The press eats her up: “Woman With A Will!,” “Fitzgibbons Throws Down Gauntlet!” She appears on television, ranting, despotic with charm. Her libido is enlarged, and she takes a young lover. And each morning, before she goes into battle, she is adoringly beautified by a hairdresser named Bruce.

It all ends in tears, as it must. Flaming, cometary, out of her mind, Mrs. Fitzgibbons loses control and is dragged to earth at last. Opinion is divided—by which I mean, my opinion is divided—as to whether Raymond Kennedy himself loses control at the end of his book. A patrician New Englander, superbly lugubrious in aspect, Kennedy taught creative writing at Columbia and died in 2008. Ride a Cockhorse was his sixth novel, and his maddest. What Mrs. Fitzgibbons does to Louis Zabac, diminutive and well-groomed chairman of the Parish Bank, on the stairs of his own house ... Over this grotesque episode we shall draw a veil. ....


The yin and the yang of Palinology are Going Rogue (by herself) and the scurrilous The Rogue (by Joe McGinniss): Palin as subject and object, the rock opera and the case history. It is the particular triumph of Kennedy’s style in Ride a Cockhorse to produce the impression that we are somehow, as it were, reading both books at once—that we are inside Mrs. Fitzgibbons’ head, sharing her exalted sense of significance and missionary urgency, while also observing her in near horror from the outside. In her case, dramatic as her achievements are, it comes down to ordinary madness: a common-or-garden manic episode. Sarah Palin, God bless her, is still out there, confounding the categories. No book has yet contained her.


*************UNQUOTE*************

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"The 1991 Novel That Predicted Sarah Palin" - a piss poorly written review from Slate (Original Post) UTUSN Jun 2012 OP
That's some tortured writing, right there Scootaloo Jun 2012 #1
Seems a huge stretch to say that was 'prescient' about Palin muriel_volestrangler Jun 2012 #2
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
1. That's some tortured writing, right there
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:51 PM
Jun 2012

I finally started giggling when he compared Palin's head to "The helm of King Leonidas"



...Yes. Really.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,426 posts)
2. Seems a huge stretch to say that was 'prescient' about Palin
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 02:45 PM
Jun 2012

The rise and fall of a woman in a regional bank from an 'epiphany' that drives her to be ruthless is hardly the same as the rise and fall of a scheming woman, whose character seems to have never changed from "I'll grab what I can fool people into giving me", in a political setting in which she is painfully out of her depth (there's no indication the book character is dumb), having been chosen by others as a PR stunt, and with her media image being most of the story.

Their personal life is different too; Palin was the antithesis of a widow, who was showcased as "wife and mother - still having children!". Far from being dead, you couldn't get rid of her husband.

If the book wasn't about a woman, no-one would ever make a connection with Palin.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"The 1991 Novel That...