Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

edhopper

(33,703 posts)
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:40 AM Jul 2017

I think McCain was covering for other Senators

McCain isn't running again (might be dead before next election)
A number of his fellow Republicans voiced how bad the Skinny Bill was and that it would be a disaster.
They know they have no plan.
But, they couldn't vote against it without the threat of being primaried.
They have so vilified the ACA to their tea party voters that not voting against it is political suicide.
So MCCain's one vote allowed them to vote for repeal without it happening.


This is my analysis of what happened.

73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think McCain was covering for other Senators (Original Post) edhopper Jul 2017 OP
I agree SHRED Jul 2017 #1
Yes and I don't think he trusted the House to keep their promise underpants Jul 2017 #2
And he'll die a hero dalton99a Jul 2017 #3
Yes, I agree. deminks Jul 2017 #4
Yes I'm going to have to agree with you Dem2 Jul 2017 #5
No, because Heller (R-Spineless) needed to vote no joeybee12 Jul 2017 #6
If you mean Heller (Nevada) edhopper Jul 2017 #8
Yes, auto correct on my phone sucks joeybee12 Jul 2017 #13
We hope so edhopper Jul 2017 #15
I live in Vegas joeybee12 Jul 2017 #18
When was the last time edhopper Jul 2017 #23
Trick question! joeybee12 Jul 2017 #26
Some guy in the 60s and 70s jayschool2013 Jul 2017 #34
Nobody remembers when you vote yes on a failed bill over a year later. RhodeIslandOne Jul 2017 #53
you are right. edhopper Jul 2017 #60
Interesting theory. I think they have spent so many years trashing ACA Laura PourMeADrink Jul 2017 #7
I agree. Think you've hit the nail squarely on the head. maddiemom Jul 2017 #37
Think u might be too optimistic about the Senate gop dembotoz Jul 2017 #9
I am not talking about most of them edhopper Jul 2017 #10
That makes sense, now that you say it. Chemisse Jul 2017 #11
I am not going to criticize somebody for doing the right thing. DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2017 #12
I wasn't criticizing edhopper Jul 2017 #16
My thoughts DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2017 #19
this is true as well edhopper Jul 2017 #21
Regardless, 48 Senators are on record voting yes Freddie Jul 2017 #14
True edhopper Jul 2017 #17
The Tea Party has been after Lindsay Graham octoberlib Jul 2017 #20
Hence why edhopper Jul 2017 #22
Graham is McCain's best friend and similarly savaged the bill VMA131Marine Jul 2017 #52
Yes. I saw the three senators in their press conference yesterday. MineralMan Jul 2017 #24
Praise? The Polack MSgt Jul 2017 #47
Yeah, it pretty much has hit that low. Dark n Stormy Knight Jul 2017 #65
Yes. His "no" vote supported the 2 TrishaJ Jul 2017 #25
Yes - took the bullet and stuck the dagger in the traitor beholden to Putin Pachamama Jul 2017 #27
Yep--and he got to swoop in at the last minute to save the day. nt tblue37 Jul 2017 #28
That was my take, too. blm Jul 2017 #29
Agree with that analysis. Xolodno Jul 2017 #30
Yes edhopper Jul 2017 #43
Very apt analysis cilla4progress Jul 2017 #31
I agree. I don't believe McCain's vote was altruistic. Raster Jul 2017 #32
Probably right on that... Wounded Bear Jul 2017 #33
except for the woman "Rs". This years Republican Party doesn't even 'like' their own woman. Sunlei Jul 2017 #35
Lol. cwydro Jul 2017 #36
I absolutely agree - and good for him. aquamarina Jul 2017 #38
Agreed mainstreetonce Jul 2017 #39
Great hypothesis. Just glad that kids, seniors, pre-conditions, etc ppl still have HC today iluvtennis Jul 2017 #40
Shame on those Senators then. mgardener Jul 2017 #41
My thoughts also! denvine Jul 2017 #42
Completely spot on. Scruffy1 Jul 2017 #44
hmmmm? rtracey Jul 2017 #45
That was a factor edhopper Jul 2017 #46
thats my point rtracey Jul 2017 #48
in other words, repukes are a bunch of fucking cowards Skittles Jul 2017 #49
That is quite obvioous edhopper Jul 2017 #50
Agree. That was a part of it. It sure upset MM though Alice11111 Jul 2017 #51
The optics were not an act with McConnell. The strategy was to throw bills they knew wouldn't pass, still_one Jul 2017 #56
Yeah, I stayed up & watched the play by play. Very interesting Alice11111 Jul 2017 #58
All three republicans, but especially Murkowski, were very courageous to go against their own party still_one Jul 2017 #59
Yes, one tough woman. Alice11111 Jul 2017 #62
I wouldn't doubt it Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2017 #54
Doubtful. The leadership in both the House and Senate wanted this bad. Ryan was told to keep those still_one Jul 2017 #55
well i gotta bluestarone Jul 2017 #57
you missunderstand edhopper Jul 2017 #61
i see your opinion but bluestarone Jul 2017 #63
Everyone underestimated John McCain. This explains why still_one Jul 2017 #64
I'll give the guy credit. This time. oasis Jul 2017 #66
I think so too...I am not convinced McConnell was in on it though. I think McCain did it for Demsrule86 Jul 2017 #67
Im don't think McConnell was in on it either edhopper Jul 2017 #68
I think this bill is now dead ... my understanding of reconciliation is it can't be brought back Demsrule86 Jul 2017 #69
I hope so edhopper Jul 2017 #70
It is reconciliation rules. They could just end the filibuster and vote on everything Demsrule86 Jul 2017 #72
John Corwyn has to be the worst whip ever Generic Brad Jul 2017 #71
Incompetent & mean...sounds like a perfect Trumpster Alice11111 Jul 2017 #73
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
1. I agree
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:43 AM
Jul 2017

The whole "Maverick" nonsense will be played up today and many will fall for it unfortunately.

underpants

(183,151 posts)
2. Yes and I don't think he trusted the House to keep their promise
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:43 AM
Jul 2017

Way too many nutcases over there and he knows it.

deminks

(11,031 posts)
4. Yes, I agree.
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:51 AM
Jul 2017

Moran from Kansas might be an example. I noticed he didn't vote with the pack. He voted yes at the very end, after there were three no votes. He's voted no a couple of times previously. I don't know if he would have voted differently last night, but seemed odd that he waited until the very end.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
5. Yes I'm going to have to agree with you
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:53 AM
Jul 2017

One gets the feeling that they didn't really want this to pass - they did not want to own it.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
6. No, because Heller (R-Spineless) needed to vote no
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:55 AM
Jul 2017

And he did not. This will hurt him. Mclame hates trump. You're right about him not running again being part of the reason

edhopper

(33,703 posts)
8. If you mean Heller (Nevada)
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:57 AM
Jul 2017

it might hurt him in the General. But voting no could lose him the primary.

jayschool2013

(2,323 posts)
34. Some guy in the 60s and 70s
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 10:38 AM
Jul 2017

Douche named Buckley. Example of what happens when you combine intelligence with moral vacuity.

 

RhodeIslandOne

(5,042 posts)
53. Nobody remembers when you vote yes on a failed bill over a year later.
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:35 PM
Jul 2017

Heller will win or lose based on the Trump disaster continuing and if his party does nothing to stop it.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
7. Interesting theory. I think they have spent so many years trashing ACA
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:56 AM
Jul 2017

and hearing Trump trash it constantly that most of the GOP and their constituents actually grew to believe it.

And, also over the years, I don't remember a single person from the press actually hold anyone's feet to the fire to ask them to spell out EXACTLY what was wrong with ACA (other than their meme that premiums now outrageous).

But the smarter ones, in the quiet booths of Capitol Hill cocktail lounges, knew it was all just an orchestrated scam to hide the fact that they simply don't give a shit about people less fortunate.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
37. I agree. Think you've hit the nail squarely on the head.
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 11:04 AM
Jul 2017

They actually came to believe themselves. Eric Cantor's recent admission (brave of him now that it can't possibly hurt him) is probably true of most of them (minus a few geniuses like Looie Gomert).

edhopper

(33,703 posts)
10. I am not talking about most of them
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:59 AM
Jul 2017

but six or eight of them have voiced how the Skinny Bill is a failure, even though they still voted for it.

Chemisse

(30,831 posts)
11. That makes sense, now that you say it.
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 09:02 AM
Jul 2017

Some GOP senators voted for it, while hoping that it would never become law.

But the House is nuts, and could have just passed it through.

edhopper

(33,703 posts)
16. I wasn't criticizing
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 09:15 AM
Jul 2017

I was analyzing.
I think a group of them knew the bill had to fail, but had to do it in a way that they could vote for it.
He took the hit form the Conservatives to see it happen.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,719 posts)
19. My thoughts
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 09:19 AM
Jul 2017

John McCain is a complex person, like all of us. I do think he hates Trump and Trumpism, loves the limelight and the adoration of the elites. Last night was the trifecta for him.

Freddie

(9,291 posts)
14. Regardless, 48 Senators are on record voting yes
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 09:11 AM
Jul 2017

For a bill that was hugely unpopular. The Senate isn't gerrymandered. Please dear God let our side write effective ads next fall!

edhopper

(33,703 posts)
17. True
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 09:18 AM
Jul 2017

but small States get Senators and they are mostly red.

Senate vote totals in 2016; Dems-45 million Rep-39 million

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
20. The Tea Party has been after Lindsay Graham
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 09:19 AM
Jul 2017

since they formed. Drive through SC when Lindsay's up for re-election and you'll see hand drawn signs calling him a RINO and a Democrat. So I agree with this.

VMA131Marine

(4,160 posts)
52. Graham is McCain's best friend and similarly savaged the bill
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:33 PM
Jul 2017

McCain voting achieved the preferred result without Graham having to put a target on his back.

MineralMan

(146,364 posts)
24. Yes. I saw the three senators in their press conference yesterday.
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 09:23 AM
Jul 2017

McCain had agreed to take the hit and vote No. I don't care. The bill failed. However it failed, it failed, and that's a good thing.

The two women who voted against it, however, did so on principle. For them I have high praise indeed. Their bravery and commitment makes them heroes, at least on this measure. They are still Republicans, though, so i'd vote against either if they were the Senator from my state.

The Polack MSgt

(13,210 posts)
47. Praise?
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 11:49 AM
Jul 2017

I appreciate that these women's dislike of the poor, the nonwhite and the disabled stopped just short of trying to allow them to die suffering.

So, thanks?

They will vote with the Putinaires 95% of the time, but I guess with this group we SHOULD praise the few who seem less likely than most Repubs to pull the wings off flies for giggles

TrishaJ

(799 posts)
25. Yes. His "no" vote supported the 2
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 09:25 AM
Jul 2017

Republican women who are under fire and gave cover to others who don't have the spine that they do.

Xolodno

(6,422 posts)
30. Agree with that analysis.
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 09:58 AM
Jul 2017

But to reiterate a point, McCain took a bullet for SOME of the GOP Senators, not all. I think the turtle is evil enough that he wanted some sort of repeal, his wife isn't in the Trump Admin for nothing.

There are definitely those Senators who wanted the ACA completely gone and didn't care what happened to the populace.

cilla4progress

(24,837 posts)
31. Very apt analysis
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 10:15 AM
Jul 2017

I believe you are correct.

Makes all their applause when McCain returned from hospital, in retrospect, somewhat "awkward"!

Wounded Bear

(58,822 posts)
33. Probably right on that...
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 10:37 AM
Jul 2017

He covered for several senators that will have tough re-election bids in '18. Hopefully they are in the "damned if they do, damned if they don't" camp. After all, they voted to take people's healthcare away. That should be duly noted in their campaigns.

 

aquamarina

(1,865 posts)
38. I absolutely agree - and good for him.
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 11:09 AM
Jul 2017

However, it's a shame his fellow repukes are such cowards but given the batshit crazy wing of the repuke party and their threats to primary sitting repuke senators with even crazier repukes, I can understand why they did it.

mgardener

(1,828 posts)
41. Shame on those Senators then.
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 11:18 AM
Jul 2017

For not standing up for their people and not standing up to Trump.
They are the worst cowards.

denvine

(802 posts)
42. My thoughts also!
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 11:21 AM
Jul 2017

I believe every vote is calculated to give cover to those at risk. There are a few who stand up for what they believe, regardless of the pressure, such as Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins, but they are a rare breed these days.

Scruffy1

(3,258 posts)
44. Completely spot on.
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 11:30 AM
Jul 2017

It's all about power to these folks, not results. There still afraid of the looneys in the primary.

 

rtracey

(2,062 posts)
45. hmmmm?
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 11:40 AM
Jul 2017

I tend to believe he was covering his own ass legacy, not the other wingers. He knows the public was ready to string him up after the first vote of yes to bring forth, and he needed to get his legacy improved.... nice try but in my opinion, his legacy is still that first vote of yes.

edhopper

(33,703 posts)
46. That was a factor
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 11:48 AM
Jul 2017

but other Senators also denounced the bill and still voted for it.

He has done so many times in the past as well.

 

rtracey

(2,062 posts)
48. thats my point
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 01:48 PM
Jul 2017

Correct, thats my point. IMO I dont think he cared what anyone was doing but himself. He knew he needed to vote no, to get all the bad rap out of his life.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
51. Agree. That was a part of it. It sure upset MM though
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:33 PM
Jul 2017

DT may tweet that McCain is no longer a war hero again.
Ugg

still_one

(92,595 posts)
56. The optics were not an act with McConnell. The strategy was to throw bills they knew wouldn't pass,
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:54 PM
Jul 2017

with the hope that no one would be paying attention when the bill they really wanted, the so-called "skinny" bill came up.

Murkowski was threatened that if she voted no the trump administration would retaliate against her state. That was not an act, and it backfired on them.

Both Pence and McConnell approached McCain multiple times on the Senate Floor when it became apparent they couldn't count on his vote. That wasn't an act.

Paul Ryan was asked to keep all house members available, and expect a bill that night. That wasn't an act.

The visible gasps on the Senate floor when McCain voted no was not an act


Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
58. Yeah, I stayed up & watched the play by play. Very interesting
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 09:01 PM
Jul 2017

I was proud of Murkowski for saying, fuck you, after DT threatened her. Also, Alaska is one of the most dependent states on Planned Parenthood.

still_one

(92,595 posts)
59. All three republicans, but especially Murkowski, were very courageous to go against their own party
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 09:10 PM
Jul 2017

She is a lioness, and if you mess with her, she is not going to take it.

Some may not remember, but she won her race against the tea party candidate with a write-in campaign. That does NOT happen, and was against all odds.

still_one

(92,595 posts)
55. Doubtful. The leadership in both the House and Senate wanted this bad. Ryan was told to keep those
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:48 PM
Jul 2017

at the House available that night, and to expect a bill that night.

Murkowski was threatened by the trump administration that if she voted no they would retaliate against Alaska.

This wasn't a show. McCain was approached multiple times on the floor of the Senate by Pence and McConnell when it became obvious that they could not rely on his vote, and when McCain finally did vote, there were audible gasps.

This was not an act to cover for someone. In fact the perfect example was Heller's vote in Nevada. Heller by voting yes has made his campaign in 2018 that much more difficult by that action.

We are just very lucky that this went down, because it almost didn't, and while this is a reprieve, it is far from over, which makes the stakes even that much more critical in 2018



bluestarone

(17,179 posts)
57. well i gotta
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 08:58 PM
Jul 2017

respectfully disagree! I like believing that McCain really felt for the American people this time just saying this time i would like to give him the benefit of the doubt! In my eyes he for one moment he deserves my applause! (maybe his wife swayed him?)

edhopper

(33,703 posts)
61. you missunderstand
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 10:07 PM
Jul 2017

A number of Repukes thought this bill was a custerfuck, maybe half a dozen or so.
But with the two women against they needed one more vote.
McCain took the point for them.
I have no problem with applauding him, I am just looking at the behind the scenes politics.

bluestarone

(17,179 posts)
63. i see your opinion but
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 10:21 PM
Jul 2017

I don't see it that way I just have a thought he did this entirely on his own but you could be right no denying that

Demsrule86

(68,929 posts)
67. I think so too...I am not convinced McConnell was in on it though. I think McCain did it for
Sat Jul 29, 2017, 07:19 AM
Jul 2017

Heller, Capito and Portman ET AL. I think McConnell lost his mind. He expected Senators to take a vote that would have very likely doomed them in their next election. It would never be forgotten or forgiven.

edhopper

(33,703 posts)
68. Im don't think McConnell was in on it either
Sat Jul 29, 2017, 08:41 AM
Jul 2017

just a select few Senators that McConnell put in an awkward position.

Demsrule86

(68,929 posts)
69. I think this bill is now dead ... my understanding of reconciliation is it can't be brought back
Sat Jul 29, 2017, 09:03 AM
Jul 2017

this year. Had McCain not voted to bring it to the floor, it could have been tabled and brought back later. But it was voted down. Skinny repeal was their only chance for a 50 vote bill as the parliamentarian ruled against repeal and replace. So if I am correct, this is a giant FU to McConnell.

Demsrule86

(68,929 posts)
72. It is reconciliation rules. They could just end the filibuster and vote on everything
Sat Jul 29, 2017, 09:44 AM
Jul 2017

with 50 votes...but I do think even some GOP types would vote against that.

Generic Brad

(14,276 posts)
71. John Corwyn has to be the worst whip ever
Sat Jul 29, 2017, 09:13 AM
Jul 2017

He has miscounted key votes in the senate on their repeal attempts repeatedly. That indicates he does not have the best relationship with his fellow GOP senators. Who would have thought our economy and health depended on key people being incompetent at executing their roles?

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think McCain was coveri...