Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Sep 5, 2017, 09:35 AM Sep 2017

Breaking from tech giants, Democrats consider becoming an anti monopoly party

By David Weigel September 4 at 11:05 AM

A messy, public brawl over a Google critic’s ouster from a Washington think tank has exposed a fissure in Democratic Party politics. On one side there’s a young and growing faction advocating new anti-monopoly laws, and on the other a rival faction struggling to defend itself.

At issue is a decades-long relationship between Democrats and tech companies, with Democratic presidents signing off on deregulation and candidates embracing money and innovations from firms like Google and Facebook. Now, locked out of power and convinced that same coziness with large corporations cost them the presidency, Democrats are talking themselves into breaking with tech giants and becoming an anti-monopoly party.

The argument had a breakthrough last week when it was reported that Barry Lynn, a monopoly critic and longtime scholar at the Google-funded New America Foundation, was leaving and taking his 10-person initiative with him.

Lynn, who has been critical of Google, had praised European regulators for hitting the company with a $2.7 billion antitrust fine. The foundation, which has received more than $21 million from Google, removed Lynn’s comments from its website. “A lot of people see this as a tipping point,” Lynn said of his departure in an interview. “This is something that’s upset people on both sides of the aisle.”

more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/breaking-from-tech-giants-democrats-consider-becoming-an-antimonopoly-party/2017/09/04/3edc7e92-8f56-11e7-84c0-02cc069f2c37_story.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking from tech giants, Democrats consider becoming an anti monopoly party (Original Post) DonViejo Sep 2017 OP
Good. shanny Sep 2017 #1
Somebody should be... Wounded Bear Sep 2017 #2
Absolute right move frazzled Sep 2017 #3
Interesting ismnotwasm Sep 2017 #4

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
3. Absolute right move
Tue Sep 5, 2017, 12:09 PM
Sep 2017

The increasing power and reach of tech giants has been troubling me for some years, and no one has seemed to care about this creeping concentration of power . . . or at least care enough even to question it or do something about it.

For most people, the power of Google is pretty invisible (except in the aspect of all the ads that appear on our screens for anything we may done a search for, whether for ourselves, an aged parent, an inquisitive grandchild, or a mere fancy). But it has our lives in lock: it's not just a question of privacy. It's an economic influence, and an influence on the kinds of information to which we have access.

The biggest bugaboo for me is Amazon, which is out of control. Not content to wreak havoc on the publishing industry (strong-arming them into pricing that has affected the kinds of books they're able or willing to publish) and retail in general, they've taken over one of the nation's largest newspapers, and now are encroaching on our food supply.

I've been receiving daily emails from the Washington Post ever since I signed up to receive daily briefings from Ezra Klein's Wonkblog many years ago, before he left to start his own endeavor. Just recently, these daily emails have been arriving not from the Washington Post but from Amazon! Really? Should that even be legal? Where is the bright line that would separate a business concern from a publishing one? I now refuse to open these emails.

We have an obligation to fight this alongside Democratic politicians. You don't have to buy from Amazon (no matter how convenient it is). Their prices are not always better, and if they are, most stores will match their price if you show them (I do it all the time). You can protest that Amazon is now pushing the newspaper that its owner also owns ... the effects are yet to be seen.

Like the consolidation of banks into giant behemoths that started in the late eighties and early nineties, this monopolization of tech companies needs to be aggressively fought before its too late to turn back. We'll have no right to complain ten years from now if we enable it go on now.

ismnotwasm

(42,028 posts)
4. Interesting
Tue Sep 5, 2017, 12:19 PM
Sep 2017
“Google was Obama’s Halliburton,” said Luther Lowe, the vice president of public policy at Yelp.


Not sure I agree with Mr. Yelp at all here, except as an ironical device

But this

Those corporations and banks were toxic. The polling found “corporate monopolies” viewed negatively by 66 percent of all voters, and 70 percent of Rust Belt voters. Just 21 percent of Rust Belt voters, however, favored “antitrust laws.”


The perception that politics are bought and sold exist when it's true, and also when it's not true. Unhitching the political wagon from corporate influence--tech or not-- will be a matter of some delicacy at certain times, and a sledge hammer at others. I hope we are wise enough to know which and when.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking from tech giants...