General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLove it! She looks amazing.
Thank you ehrnst!
FakeNoose
(32,917 posts)I'm so tired of the pix of Hillary in which she doesn't look so great. I know she's not vain, but let's face it most older women don't look perfect on film. It takes a little work/skill to get a nice photo and I can say this because I am an older woman. So are many of my family and friends.
Hillary can look great when the photographer makes an effort, but so few actually do.
mcar
(42,469 posts)A gorgeous shot of her.
FakeNoose
(32,917 posts)underpants
(183,040 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,384 posts)Our president. Our hero president.
ProfessorGAC
(65,412 posts)Bill Murray on the cover with a headline warning about this being the new army.
ailsagirl
(22,908 posts)Kudos to Newsweek!!
Bet he loved that one. I wonder if he'll hang it on his wall.
keithbvadu2
(37,044 posts)annabanana
(52,791 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)That the artist who projects things on public buildings around D.C. Would project this cover on the White House and other buildings around town 🙂
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)Hahaha, loser!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)FakeNoose
(32,917 posts)She's a star in my book. I wish her all the best.
Croney
(4,680 posts)I can't wait to get it!
R B Garr
(17,019 posts)This is great to see. She looks proud and confident. That's what Democrats need now, to be proud and confident. Not beat down and browbeaten by third party lies and strategies to undermine our party. Take the power back. I love it that Clinton looks almost defiant here.
iluvtennis
(19,911 posts)IronLionZion
(45,663 posts)Trump will say Time is fake news!
R B Garr
(17,019 posts)Big league stuff!
George II
(67,782 posts)IronLionZion
(45,663 posts)first woman to manage a winning presidential campaign
Hekate
(91,025 posts)Ilsa
(61,714 posts)I guess her parents arrived and remained legally. Or maybe she was an anchor baby.
NNadir
(33,587 posts)Hekate
(91,025 posts)They are both children of immigrants. She appears to be intelligent. Other than that, I have not bothered to learn that much about her. Wikipedia and Google and her Bio page would tell you more.
But as for reasons to put her in the same league with other accomplished American women? She is.
NNadir
(33,587 posts)...to march in the streets in 2017 in the United States of America.
If that defines "intelligent" that definition escapes me.
Intelligence without ethics is worse than useless.
I couldn't care less about her bio. The company she keeps says everything I need to know about her.
Hekate
(91,025 posts)If you have an issue with TIME's choices, let them know.
NNadir
(33,587 posts)...notable distinction of having two Nazis, Hitler and Trump, being declared "Person of the Year."
Perhaps having Ms. Clinton on the cover is an attempt at expiation. I don't care.
I'm not going to write them. I clearly have very little respect for them.
Ms. Haley is unremarkable in any case, and her "first" is essentially worthless, particularly since it involves arbitrary factors in her genome, and that it isn't "white Anglo-Saxon" is mildly remarkable, but nevertheless she's a racist who was elected governor of the most racist state in the Union.
whopis01
(3,534 posts)UTUSN
(70,793 posts)justhanginon
(3,290 posts)and are heartened by what they can achieve.
It also, sadly, makes me literally sick that we could have had Secretary Clinton as president and running this country properly with intelligence and compassion as the great nation we once were.
Ilsa
(61,714 posts)Generally, I don't care for that phrase, because govt and business have different objectives.
But HRC would have run the WH like a finely tuned piano, a well-oiled machine. People wouldn't constantly waiting for the other shoe to drop, or for the ratings to come out on a reality tv show.
bullwinkle428
(20,631 posts)SunSeeker
(51,803 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)Changing the world! The top news program on cable!
She's wonderful. Ignore what they say; watch what they do!!!
R&
FakeNoose
(32,917 posts)I try to never miss her show.
mountain grammy
(26,673 posts)we'd be saying Madame President! About time, Time.
calimary
(81,605 posts)And let's never forget - she won the popular vote, and by a LOT. With no help from Russia. With no help from a whole lot of nogoodniks and other bad guys. They can NEVER take that away from her.
There's MY President.
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)And one for many women. Can't wait to get my copy.
SunSeeker
(51,803 posts)ffr
(22,681 posts)Ilsa
(61,714 posts)Centered, at peace. Donald looks like he's been in a hurricane.
progressoid
(50,020 posts)A little overboard on the photoshop. Her clothing is is way too flaw free. A little tune up on skin and hair is to be expected, but her clothing looks like it was CGI rendered.
Please note. This has nothing to do with Hillary. Somebody just got carried away in the art department.
yuiyoshida
(41,871 posts)Not sure who he hates more, Hillary or Obama. My wager is on Obama as to who Trump hates the most in this world.
Renew Deal
(81,900 posts)Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)usaf-vet
(6,239 posts)AND I'm sure the Congressional offices will have their own levels of outrage to express.
SalviaBlue
(2,918 posts)argyl
(3,064 posts)If the Orange Tub of Goo says she's crooked that's good enough for me.
Yeah, if Hillary were where she deserves to be, in the Oval Office, we'd be in so much better shape as a country.
Much more respected internationally, 800,000 fine young people not worried sick about their status, no fear of starting WWIII on the Korean Peninsula, and we'd be dealing with Russian influences on our government. And that's just off the top of my head.
nolabear
(42,004 posts)niyad
(113,960 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,835 posts)ailsagirl
(22,908 posts)Cool! Rachel is on the list, along with Nancy Pelosi and many others (will have to read the magazine)
I await all the "can't she just go away," "she's destroying the party" laments.
trueblue2007
(17,250 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Hillary, still as relevant as ever!
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)SergeStorms
(19,205 posts)Really? She drives a car around in circles. Hardly a world changer, in my opinion. She wasn't even the first woman driver in NASCAR. Others paved the way for her, actually. She's popular because NASCAR dads think she's purty'.
Hey, it is what it is. More power to her (literally and figuratively).
spooky3
(34,527 posts)She's had tremendous impact for women--and men.
SergeStorms
(19,205 posts)She was far more important for the advancement of women than some of the others. But I guess there's always someone who maybe shouldn't be there, and some that should be, but aren't. Just about any "list" is flawed like that.
JI7
(89,289 posts)keithbvadu2
(37,044 posts)NNadir
(33,587 posts)Haley doesn't deserve to be mentioned on the same page as Hillary.
She's the appointee and defender of a crude racist.
brer cat
(24,658 posts)Thanks for posting, ehrnst. K&R
csziggy
(34,140 posts)VERY nice! I couldn't find a video online but I'm sure it will be available soon.
Watch for it - it is not in your face but makes an impact.
Edited to add - here is Time's page with clips about the Firsts they are featuring:
http://time.com/collection/firsts/
oasis
(49,490 posts)Sgent
(5,857 posts)but Condoleezza Rice should really be on the list.
http://time.com/collection/firsts/?xid=homepage&pcd=hp-magmod
onetexan
(13,080 posts)And i mean that both by the magazine & time . Pic is beautiful & makes me wish she as in the WH now instead of diffuse 45.