General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMar-a-lago has flood insurance thru controversial Fed program
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_59b3cd79e4b0dfaafcf82e52/amp...."The property has a flood insurance policy through the National Flood Insurance Program, a Federal Emergency Management Agency spokesperson told HuffPost. The program provides affordable insurance in flood-prone zones where private insurers have traditionally refused to insure properties because theyre so vulnerable.
.......
The insurance programs authorization was set to expire at the end of this month, but Trump signed legislation on Friday that temporarily extends it.
NFIP as a whole has been criticized for not charging enough to cover the expected costs of liabilities. It also consistently does not bring in enough money to pay out the properties it insures, and owes around $25 billion to the U.S. Treasury. Based on policies that went into effect on Aug. 31, 2016, the program is projected to have a one-year shortfall of $1.4 billion, according to a Congressional Budget Office report published this month.
Some critics say the program benefits affluent people who live on beachfront property, essentially allowing them to live in places that are at a high risk of being damaged.
If [NFIP] was a regular insurance company, they would have been in receivership, Burl Daniel, an insurance expert witness from Texas, told HuffPost. But its a political football because of the people who live on the coast. .....
Phoenix61
(17,026 posts)what part of barrier island is so difficult to understand? IMO, if you want to build on it go for it but you're on your own for insurance.
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)"There were 129,360 NFIP claims from superstorm Sandy as of October 2015. The average paid loss was $61,809, compared with 167,970 claims from Katrina, with an average paid loss of $97,140."
http://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/flood-insurance
That is a lot of claims IMHO. Who knew that so many homes could not be insured.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,254 posts)and $100K for personal possessions. Beyond that, people have to get private insurance.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)and that is largely upper income people with more expensive homes.
http://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2017/08/08/hidden-subsidy-rich-flood-insurance-000495
JimGinPA
(14,811 posts)And those who chose to live in high risk areas should have to pay premiums large enough to offset the shortfall in the program or it needs to be done away with.
I guess "drain the swamp" just referred to his property after a disaster.
dembotoz
(16,866 posts)I have what is considered minimal risk so rates are pretty low.
What I do think is controversial is u can pay ur regular insurance for years and the find ur lose not covered
Tess49
(1,580 posts)close by. A couple of years ago, and about three blocks north of here, there was so much rain that cars were floating down the street. My house is several feet higher than street level. Every year I try to talk myself out of renewing the policy. Yet, I feel safer keeping it.
dembotoz
(16,866 posts)I live at a condo project on a man made lake.my unit is right on the lake maybe 4 ft up from lake surface. A whole lot of folks are going to be floating before I do but we have wacky weather now...so I insure.
Tess49
(1,580 posts)Roy Rolling
(6,943 posts)A building having flood insurance is not a unique situation.
But when he claimed $17 million in hurricane losses 12 years ago, and pocketed some of the money, THAT'S abuse.
cstanleytech
(26,357 posts)insurance for the average person and only if its their primary residence.