Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onethatcares

(16,212 posts)
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 05:43 PM Nov 2017

does this theory have any credence?

we've been in the Mid East for a long time, killed many a family in "collateral" damage. Do you think that the sons of those killed are now old enough to follow through with the grudges they may bear?

This thought runs through my mind daily. The Iraqis, the Kurds, the Afghanis, know that revenge will be taken sooner or later and that time grinds on. The stories told of missing family members are handed down over generations.

Would/could these attacks on American soil be in retaliation to this?

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
does this theory have any credence? (Original Post) onethatcares Nov 2017 OP
Sounds logical to me. fierywoman Nov 2017 #1
Yes, they sure are, and consequently I blame elleng Nov 2017 #2
I certainly think it's true gratuitous Nov 2017 #3
Yes it is logical and our actions are recruitment propaganda if we appear to be the invaders. Doodley Nov 2017 #4
Yes loyalsister Nov 2017 #5
I think it's actually a little early that elehhhhna Nov 2017 #6
Those who didn't already join ISIS, you mean? HopeAgain Nov 2017 #7
We've been messing around in the ME since WWII, at least... Wounded Bear Nov 2017 #8

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
3. I certainly think it's true
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 05:53 PM
Nov 2017

While individuals like the Home Depot driver yesterday might be radicalized by any number of things, we've certainly sown the seeds of hatred and discontent for the past 15 years. Whether it's bombing wedding parties or blasting hospitals in Syria, we've done very little to ameliorate our own actions, and exacerbated any hard feelings by repeatedly denying any wrongdoing.

Do innocents on the streets of New York deserve to be retaliated against? Obviously not. But neither were the people collaterally damaged in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen by our military and its contractors. We need to own up to our own participation in these crimes against humanity.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
5. Yes
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 06:11 PM
Nov 2017

The sons, nephews, and grandsons of the men who fought Charlie Wilson's war now have their own sons. It's not just the stories of missing family members, the vacuum created when the male role models disappeared was an opening for angry, militant men to recruit them.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
6. I think it's actually a little early that
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 06:16 PM
Nov 2017

Most of the young Islamic men who have committed terroristic crimes in western countries seem to be second generation westerners. In other respects theyre much like the young white men who have shot a lot of people - they are disaffected, rudderless, angry...

HopeAgain

(4,407 posts)
7. Those who didn't already join ISIS, you mean?
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 06:21 PM
Nov 2017

That's exactly what we are going to deal with for at least a generation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»does this theory have any...