Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
Sat Nov 4, 2017, 04:31 PM Nov 2017

Focus on The Family - Bible apps are EVIL says John McAfee - Invasive on your phone

Careful with those permissions! I'm not religious, just an FYI!

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/17/mcafee_phishes_a_room_of_sysadmins_all_in_the_name_of_security/

“In America we have bible-reading applications: every single one of those applications asks permission to turn on your microphone, your camera, it wants permission to read your e-mails and the right to send e-mails wherever it chooses.”

The permissions also include SMS, video, photos, all of which can be wrapped up and sent to a fundamental religious group called “Focus on the Family”, he said.

“That scares me,” he said.

Fitting his angle to the audience, McAfee pointed out that everything that passes through a lawyer's e-mail is, after all, sensitive, whether it's facts or pleas, assertions or fees – and all of it, if a user okays excessive permissions, is available to an app.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Focus on The Family - Bible apps are EVIL says John McAfee - Invasive on your phone (Original Post) RKP5637 Nov 2017 OP
Is that guy anointed or something? Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #1
Just a researcher. n/t RKP5637 Nov 2017 #2
OK, in that case he should not use the word evil per se. Maybe "unadvised"? Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #3
He didn't. The headline writer did. Mariana Nov 2017 #5
Angry they don't work with his rotary phone at home dembotoz Nov 2017 #4

Mariana

(14,863 posts)
5. He didn't. The headline writer did.
Sat Nov 4, 2017, 05:31 PM
Nov 2017

At least, there is no quote in the article in which he uses that word. I suppose it's possible he did use it, but I think it's much more likely it was the headline writer.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Focus on The Family - Bib...