Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cilla4progress

(24,804 posts)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:21 PM Nov 2017

Does anyone feel the Russian investigation is losing steam?

I.e., momentum?

It feels like it's been dragging on so long, as tRump makes these big overseas tours and is seen filling the Presidential role, I'm afraid people will lose their enthusiasm. Which is clearly tRump's MO.

This isn't the case for us, here, but across the board elsewhere? We need more indictments!

That's why I appreciate Rachel for staying on it and keeping it in the headlines.

65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does anyone feel the Russian investigation is losing steam? (Original Post) cilla4progress Nov 2017 OP
Mueller was months ahead of the news. He's still interviewing people NightWatcher Nov 2017 #1
Plus, look at the list of sealed indictments so far. Plenty more to come, I bet. L. Coyote Nov 2017 #53
It was reported that it was going to result in Thanksgiving indictments Not Ruth Nov 2017 #2
By whom? shanny Nov 2017 #24
Juliette Kayyem Not Ruth Nov 2017 #28
Some analyst predicted it shanny Nov 2017 #31
Start paying attention to the bot waves online bathroommonkey76 Nov 2017 #60
No thanks. shanny Nov 2017 #62
He just recently issued indictments, has had guilty pleas,... NCTraveler Nov 2017 #3
In most investigations fescuerescue Nov 2017 #16
And there are currently people "under the threat of indictment". NCTraveler Nov 2017 #18
perhaps fescuerescue Nov 2017 #41
There are several still sealed indictments. nt tblue37 Nov 2017 #44
Do you remember Watergate? I do. shanny Nov 2017 #22
I do fescuerescue Nov 2017 #40
Ah, but this isn't at all like "most investigations" RandomAccess Nov 2017 #58
Critical mass hasn't been reached SonofDonald Nov 2017 #4
I think it is about making an ironclad case. gvstn Nov 2017 #5
Not in the slightest. Kentonio Nov 2017 #6
No. nt Ilsa Nov 2017 #7
It's well known that this investigation was going to take a long time bearsfootball516 Nov 2017 #8
It could take 30 years to get the real story, but I expect the indictments this month Not Ruth Nov 2017 #12
Think of how long it took for Watergate to unfold. I think we are fine at this pace NRaleighLiberal Nov 2017 #9
I think most people do not understand the traditional federal investigative process. LonePirate Nov 2017 #10
Not at all. The Moore kerfuffle has knocked the MSM coverage of the investigation below the fold.... Brother Buzz Nov 2017 #11
NOPE. I feel it is Mueller day every day Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #13
Watergate took something around two years. We can't expect this investigation to save us from Trump. Afromania Nov 2017 #14
I couldn't have said this better nt Sunsky Nov 2017 #64
Things happen even if media says little bobbieinok Nov 2017 #15
No. n/t demmiblue Nov 2017 #17
This isn't a TV show. We need a Court of Law not a Court of Public Opinion. PubliusEnigma Nov 2017 #19
Yes, but political considerations are certainly at play cilla4progress Nov 2017 #35
Watergate took a couple of years from the original arrests of the burglars to Nixon's resignation Yavin4 Nov 2017 #20
No. Snackshack Nov 2017 #21
Patience my pretties..... LakeArenal Nov 2017 #23
... these things must be done delicately! NurseJackie Nov 2017 #27
All one needs to know is, Wellstone ruled Nov 2017 #25
Absence of nightly media bombshells doesnt mean nothings happening EffieBlack Nov 2017 #26
No Botany Nov 2017 #29
No Gothmog Nov 2017 #30
This isn't "Monicagate" with sneaky Linda Tripp Zambero Nov 2017 #32
NO JI7 Nov 2017 #33
No. We aren't going to get an indictment every week. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2017 #34
No - I think that people expect things to happen faster and faster karynnj Nov 2017 #36
I think Mueller is "old school" and went quiet while the Orange Fuhrer was overseas. Vinca Nov 2017 #37
My ongoing fear is that in the end there will be nothing, PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2017 #38
I had a hysterectomy Marthe48 Nov 2017 #39
i feel like Mueller is a top-notch professional doing a very difficult job 0rganism Nov 2017 #42
Mueller doesn't care about perception get the red out Nov 2017 #43
I don't think Mueller is letting the media dictate his schedule DFW Nov 2017 #45
We have to be patient. I think Mueller is very thorough and when he drops redstatebluegirl Nov 2017 #46
not in the least. spanone Nov 2017 #47
Not in the least. murielm99 Nov 2017 #48
Maybe cilla4progress Nov 2017 #49
Not at all. kstewart33 Nov 2017 #50
Thank cilla4progress Nov 2017 #51
No alittlelark Nov 2017 #52
The investigation is not paced to maximize your entertainment Loki Liesmith Nov 2017 #54
Nope. madamesilverspurs Nov 2017 #55
If things don't happen soon I'm afraid 45 will get rid of him AJT Nov 2017 #56
Yes cilla4progress Nov 2017 #57
Nope JustAnotherGen Nov 2017 #59
No DeminPennswoods Nov 2017 #61
No Meowmee Nov 2017 #63
Nope. tavernier Nov 2017 #65

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
1. Mueller was months ahead of the news. He's still interviewing people
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:23 PM
Nov 2017

Revelations have slowed in the last week, but I'd bet something big is coming very soon.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
53. Plus, look at the list of sealed indictments so far. Plenty more to come, I bet.
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 11:54 PM
Nov 2017

Our appetites were primed when it was necessary to indict ahead of a statute of limitations. We can't let that determine our expectations for every week going forward.

 

Not Ruth

(3,613 posts)
28. Juliette Kayyem
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:59 PM
Nov 2017

Juliette Kayyem: 'It Is Safe To Say That Before Thanksgiving ... Something Is Going To Drop With Mueller.'
October 25, 2017
MOLLY BOIGON
National security expert Juliette Kayyem is predicting news from Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation will be announced within the next month.

“I think it is safe to say that before Thanksgiving ... something’s going to drop with Mueller,” she said on Boston Public Radio today. “The pace is too much right now. Every 12 hours we’re now dealing with a piece of this story at a pace we haven’t seen.”

Kayyem was prompted to make her prediction by the buzz surrounding a story about how Hillary Clinton’s campaign funded what would eventually become the famous “Trump-Russia Dossier” that surfaced in January.

 

bathroommonkey76

(3,827 posts)
60. Start paying attention to the bot waves online
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 06:56 AM
Nov 2017

They are flooding Twitter, YT, FB, and other sites with some crazy and disturbing shit. This stuff happened before the Manafort indictment, too.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
3. He just recently issued indictments, has had guilty pleas,...
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:27 PM
Nov 2017

with multiple arrests. Not small players in any way. How in the world is it losing steam? Seems to be the exact opposite. We are now hearing rumors of additional arrests and a continuing increase in the scope of the investigation.

Everything I see tells me it's the opposite of "losing steam".

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
16. In most investigations
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:39 PM
Nov 2017

Indictments are almost always the peak of activity. After that it's very difficult to do clandestine investigation since all the suspect change their mode of operations. Most of the "flipping" that occurs, happens under the threat of indictment, which that suspect can be most useful and the higher level target remains unaware.

After indictments are made public, most of the activity moves to either trial or pleas. There might be a few lower level indictments, but usually the first "strike" is highest and best.

So while I couldn't call it "losing steam", I do think it's contracting, focusing, and eventually closing not expanding.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
18. And there are currently people "under the threat of indictment".
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:42 PM
Nov 2017

For is't conception it has not been a "clandestine investigation".

"and eventually closing not expanding."

That is the exact opposite of losing steam.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
41. perhaps
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 01:34 PM
Nov 2017

But "threat of indictment" isn't exactly a legal term. It's a media term.

And if there wasn't clandestine investigation going on, then somebody was doing it wrong. I get "clandestine" sounds scary but that's not the intent here. Virtually all investigations, except for maybe stoplight cameras have an element of clandestine.

 

shanny

(6,709 posts)
22. Do you remember Watergate? I do.
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:49 PM
Nov 2017

The process took more than 2 years to culminate in Nixon's resignation. Mueller was appointed in May and has been looking under every rock...and with this bunch there are a lot of rocks.

And no, in an investigation like this (essentially one into organized crime), the first indictments are not the biggest and best: they are the first waves hitting a foundation of sand.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
40. I do
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 01:31 PM
Nov 2017

Well that is what I'm pointing out. He was appointed in May and there is already the big splash of indictments.

In an investigation (not the overall prosecution, just the investigation), Indictments are a closing activity of that investigation phase.

Believe me, holding a indictment over someones head is a HUGE lever for getting what you need out of that individual. Once you pull that lever, you can't pull it again.

Either way - it should be interesting to watch this play out.

 

RandomAccess

(5,210 posts)
58. Ah, but this isn't at all like "most investigations"
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 12:33 AM
Nov 2017

For one thing, it's the largest investigation since 911.

The indictments so far announced (Manaford, Papadapoulis) or intimated (Flint, Flint Jr) have been released for strategic effect. They also involve people mostly around the edges. There are more sealed indictments -- forget how many but 12 or thereabouts sticks in my mind.

Mueller is like a chess grand master. He has some 16 of the very best prosecutors in the country, all specializing in various badass crimes -- money laundering, RICO, who knows what all.

Hang on, it's going to be quite a show, IMO.

SonofDonald

(2,050 posts)
4. Critical mass hasn't been reached
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:27 PM
Nov 2017

But the tipping point has happened, the moment the first indictment was unsealed.

Popular opinion and the dumpfs attempts to change it's direction didn't stop that from happening, Mueller will not be swayed from releasing his magnum opus.

gvstn

(2,805 posts)
5. I think it is about making an ironclad case.
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:28 PM
Nov 2017

Just as impeachment talks are premature without articulating a clear and decisive and provable case for impeachment in that talk.

Mueller isn't going to indict unless he knows the charge is provable within a reasonable doubt. To do otherwise would be foolish and make future investigations of political shenanigans harder to get approved. Don't look for momentum, look for facts that prove wrongdoing and I hope actual accountability. Remember Trump and pals will have some of the best and perhaps least moral lawyers working to discredit every single piece of evidence Mueller puts forth. One wrong move by Mueller could overshadow the true facts of the case.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
6. Not in the slightest.
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:29 PM
Nov 2017

Real investigations of this scale take years, if anything I'm surprised by how quickly things are moving.

NRaleighLiberal

(60,040 posts)
9. Think of how long it took for Watergate to unfold. I think we are fine at this pace
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:30 PM
Nov 2017

It goes without saying how impatient we all are to nail this criminal cabal!

LonePirate

(13,448 posts)
10. I think most people do not understand the traditional federal investigative process.
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:32 PM
Nov 2017

These investigations take time and it is clear this investigation involves more than an obstruction charge for firing Comey. There were rumors a few weeks ago (before the Manafort indictment became public), that Mueller would be wrapping up by Thanksgiving. That was misinformation at its finest.

Then there were reports *last week* about Mueller preparing to speak with Stephen Miller. He should have been questioned as soon as news broke of the June 2016 meeting at the Tower with Junior.

Despite the recent indictments, the case is still moving (plodding?) along, albeit not as fast as any of us on the left would prefer. We simply need to be patient and not get upset unless we hear Mueller is closing up shop. We cannot give up hope!

Brother Buzz

(36,508 posts)
11. Not at all. The Moore kerfuffle has knocked the MSM coverage of the investigation below the fold....
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:32 PM
Nov 2017

but the big indictment just before Thanksgiving will be all the nation will talk about at the Thanksgiving tables.

Afromania

(2,771 posts)
14. Watergate took something around two years. We can't expect this investigation to save us from Trump.
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:36 PM
Nov 2017

We are going to have to save ourselves in any/all upcoming elections. There is no time to be disheartened or put off by lack of bombshell news because we need to keep on turning over red seats across the country. Barring his firing Muller will probably get this done but even at an accelerated rate we are probably going to have a bit of a wait.

You don't have to worry about trump. he's is no way or fashion is doing anything that seems presidential. Every minute, hour and second of every day trump is proven to be a complete and utter fraud of a human being. Nobody will ever accuse him of being "presidential".

cilla4progress

(24,804 posts)
35. Yes, but political considerations are certainly at play
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 01:14 PM
Nov 2017

and I am willing to bet Mueller is keeping in mind how this will play / affect national government, leadership. What is at stake. Armed rebellion by the deplorables if evidence isn't ironclad?

In my view politics ALWAYS plays into legal outcomes. IOW, there courts can, and have been known to, justify a wide array of clearly biased decisions: Bush v. Gore, Plessy v. Ferguson, for example.

Yavin4

(35,455 posts)
20. Watergate took a couple of years from the original arrests of the burglars to Nixon's resignation
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:47 PM
Nov 2017

Mueller is actually ahead of schedule.

Snackshack

(2,541 posts)
21. No.
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:47 PM
Nov 2017

The former US attorney for the Southern District of NY Preet Bharara (who was fired by trump after being asked to stay) has a podcast that discusses the speed of the Russian investigation. In his opinion he says Mueller is going fast with it. That there is a lot more than just the alleged collusion with Russia that he is investigating. I highly recommend the podcast. The name of it is

Stay Tuned with Preet.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
25. All one needs to know is,
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:56 PM
Nov 2017

there are Funding Dates in Washington DC. Mr. Mueller has to notify the Treasury will a Budget and forward funding needs for the next Fiscal Year beginning at the end of October,which should have been the 28 th. The next round of Jail filling should begin in late December and again in January.

Just a Paper Shuffling pause.

 

EffieBlack

(14,249 posts)
26. Absence of nightly media bombshells doesnt mean nothings happening
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 12:57 PM
Nov 2017

Investigations are slow and painstaking. Mueller’s doing his job, even when the press isn’t reporting on it.

Gothmog

(146,012 posts)
30. No
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 01:01 PM
Nov 2017

Mueller is not leaking anything about this investigation. I am pleased to see how professional this investigation has been

Zambero

(8,982 posts)
32. This isn't "Monicagate" with sneaky Linda Tripp
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 01:06 PM
Nov 2017

Given a cast of many characters foreign and domestic, mountains of evidence, increasing scope, and ongoing interviews for Mueller and company to process, it is bound to be a lengthy process.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(116,021 posts)
34. No. We aren't going to get an indictment every week.
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 01:09 PM
Nov 2017

That isn't how it works. The grand jury will indict when it has considered all of the evidence, and there's no specific time line for that. It happens when it happens, and Mueller's people don't leak - so we'll know when it happens but there's no way to know when that will be.

karynnj

(59,511 posts)
36. No - I think that people expect things to happen faster and faster
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 01:21 PM
Nov 2017

Compare this to the pace of Watergate. It is much faster. It might be the culture where people now can binge watch an entire new season of some shows wants something big to happen every day or at least every Friday. In fact, the number of big stories that have been dumped over the last few months is impressive.

What is also clear is that Mueller is very controlled, very precise and very methodical. This is what we want. Look at how the Iran/Contra hearings in the House/Senate investigation ended up giving immunity to people who should have been indicted. (The ones indicted lied not to that high profile hearing, but to the very low key Kerry subcommittee hearings - a fact that should be mentioned every time Elliot Abrams or Oliver North attack John Kerry.)

Vinca

(50,336 posts)
37. I think Mueller is "old school" and went quiet while the Orange Fuhrer was overseas.
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 01:27 PM
Nov 2017

As soon as Don hits US soil again, I expect the indictment mill will start up again.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,931 posts)
38. My ongoing fear is that in the end there will be nothing,
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 01:28 PM
Nov 2017

just like the investigation into the Valerie Plame revelations. I think there was exactly one indictment, and a lot of people in the Bush administration got completely away with treason.

It could happen again.

Marthe48

(17,147 posts)
39. I had a hysterectomy
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 01:30 PM
Nov 2017

I was in surgery for hours longer than anticipated. I had used a Dalkon Shield i.u.d. which had caused numerous infections, which left extensive scar tissue. The surgeon explained that in the effort to make sure they got everything, they had to work through the scar tissue and it was 'all stuck together' so the surgery took much longer.
Mueller has a tissue of lies to sort through. We must try to be patient as he picks through it and makes sure he doesn't miss anything.

0rganism

(23,996 posts)
42. i feel like Mueller is a top-notch professional doing a very difficult job
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 01:42 PM
Nov 2017

from what i read, he has an extremely competent, maybe even formidable, staff, well equipped to engage on issues of foreign-based crimes including money laundering and banking fraud.

i'm confident that Mueller's investigation will proceed on his timetable, with minimal regard for political timing or media-oriented feel good moments. sure, this lets the perps grandstand and bloviate unopposed for a time, but this too shall pass. the time will come when they can no longer fall back on such behavior, and every lie they've told weighs like a cinderblock roped to their ankles.

DFW

(54,520 posts)
45. I don't think Mueller is letting the media dictate his schedule
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 02:03 PM
Nov 2017

Just because Roy Moore's sleazy habits are on the front pages this week, I don't the Mueller team has slowed down in the slightest. In fact, I bet they welcome the brief reprieve from the headlines and the spotlight. They'll have enough of both when the next series of indictments are handed down and witnesses called.

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
46. We have to be patient. I think Mueller is very thorough and when he drops
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 02:05 PM
Nov 2017

the next batch of indictments they will be more than shocking and so complete they can't be challenged.

murielm99

(30,790 posts)
48. Not in the least.
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 03:21 PM
Nov 2017

It does not have to be in the news every day. Remember, 45 and his gang, and several members of the media are doing all they can to knock this off the front pages.

Watergate took two years.

We have GOTV to accomplish, elections to win.

Thanks for your concern.

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
50. Not at all.
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 11:51 PM
Nov 2017

We're all impatient but give it time. So many players are involved and the crimes span several countries. My hunch: We'll see some indictments in the next week or so. But it's going to be awhile before it's all finished.

AJT

(5,240 posts)
56. If things don't happen soon I'm afraid 45 will get rid of him
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 12:06 AM
Nov 2017

before anything comes of the investigation.

JustAnotherGen

(32,053 posts)
59. Nope
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 06:47 AM
Nov 2017

I think it is going at a fine pace. Flynn is obviously up next. After that - the Manafort trial begins in early spring. Hopefully it will start to pick up next summer.

That would be perfect.

Meowmee

(5,164 posts)
63. No
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 07:36 AM
Nov 2017

Seems like this is the beginning with a lot more to come soon. The fake is not presidential. Each day is a new revelation of lunacy, craziness, dementia and incompetency and so on.

tavernier

(12,429 posts)
65. Nope.
Wed Nov 15, 2017, 08:16 AM
Nov 2017

It might have because of the time factor, but the more the trumpies deny it, scream about it, howl to the moon over it, the more ppl can smell the acrid billows of smoke pouring from the White House.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does anyone feel the Russ...