Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJeff Sessions just offered the Trump teams latest spin on Russia
Bubbling idiot. I did watch some of it!
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Jeff Sessions just offered the Trump teams latest spin on Russia
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2017/11/14/jeff-sessions-just-offered-the-trump-teams-latest-spin-on-russia/?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.7c3a0723a282
By Paul Waldman November 14 at 1:38 PM
Play Video 3:26
Sessions: 'I have always told the truth'
Attorney General Jeff Sessions spoke before the House Judiciary Committee Nov. 14. (Reuters)
Unlike his boss, who claims he possesses one of the greatest memories of all time, Attorney General Jeff Sessions is a man who gazes into the past and sees only a fog of out-of-focus associates and half-remembered events. But in his testimony today before the House Judiciary Committee, Sessions may have hit on the new Trump administration defense for the Russia scandal, one that can be applied to almost any future revelation.
Its essence is that the Trump campaign was such an ungodly, bumbling mess that it was simply incapable of colluding with the Russians in their campaign to undermine Hillary Clinton, help Donald Trump get elected, and generally disrupt and discredit the American electoral system.
As weaselly a defense as that may seem, it contains a good bit of truth. With each new revelation about the campaigns contacts with Russia, a picture is filling out. Its one not of a well-organized collusion conspiracy, but instead of a bunch of nincompoops engaging in a kind of ongoing, ad hoc, fitful sort-of-collusion, one that involved lots of meetings, lots of emails, and lots of contacts between various Russians with Kremlin connections and people at different levels of the campaign. Whether it fits your definition of collusion, it was one heck of an incompetent conspiracy.
This is what Sessions emphasized as a way of explaining his own faulty memory. Previously he had denied under oath that he met with any Russians during the campaign, a denial that was subsequently revealed to be false, since he had met with the Russian ambassador. He had also said, when asked whether he had any contact with Russians, I did not, and Im not aware of anyone else that did, and I dont believe it happened.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1158 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeff Sessions just offered the Trump teams latest spin on Russia (Original Post)
riversedge
Nov 2017
OP
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)1. Saying "I do not recall" uncountable times cannot be a lie of omisssion
if a Republican does it! They aren't bright enough.
riversedge
(70,456 posts)2. Sesssions pulls another Ronald R--I was out of the loop!!
Worked for him. He is still the Repug Hero!
Solly Mack
(90,801 posts)3. Damn
lame54
(35,345 posts)4. The Matt Taibbi defense...
He lived in Russia for many years and says it is so screwed up that he doubts it could pull off something like this
Pretty weak reason from an investigative reporter
DFW
(54,506 posts)5. Sessions swore under Oaf
I do solemnly swear to tell the truce, the whole truce and nothing but the truce, so help me God.
I think he meant the treaty of Ghent, but he didn't specify.