Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,068 posts)
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 05:56 PM Apr 2015

DeLauro: Pay people $2,000 to turn in assault weapons

Source: Shelton Herald

Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro, whose district includes a part of Shelton, will re-introduce the SAFER (Support Assault Firearm Elimination and Education for our) Streets Act that would provide a tax credit to people who chose to turn in an assault weapon to law enforcement.

“Just days after the Newtown tragedy, President Obama asked, ‘Are we doing enough to protect our children?’ And he admitted the answer is no. That must change,” said DeLauro, a Democrat in her 13th term in the U.S. Congress.

“The SAFER Streets Act is a common-sense, constructive step to help ensure such a tragedy will never happen again,” she said. “This bill would get more assault weapons off the streets.”

DeLauro made the announcement on the SAFER Streets Act on Monday, noting that was the start of National Public Health Week from April 6 to 12.

Read more: http://www.sheltonherald.com/65652/delauro-pay-people-to-turn-in-their-assault-weapons/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
2. They are doing this with lawns in California, the state will buy back at $2 a sq ft your green
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 06:06 PM
Apr 2015

lawn, or something like that.

petronius

(26,607 posts)
3. Maybe (probably) I'm missing something, but from the text linked here
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 06:20 PM
Apr 2015
http://delauro.house.gov/images/pdf/SAFERStreetsAct114th.pdf

it seems that the definition of "specified assault weapon" includes things that can be legally purchased right now for less than $2000. Why wouldn't people just go out and buy a rifle, trade it in for the $2000 tax credit, and then (over time) have the money to buy a replacement rifle plus change left over.

That said, even setting aside the excess of this proposal, I view 'buybacks' of any sort to be a inappropriately ineffective use of public funds. If private organizations want to run them then great, but the government has better things to do with its cash...

former9thward

(32,106 posts)
4. Only one weapon allowed.
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 06:42 PM
Apr 2015
The tax-payer may elect the application of this section with respect to only 1 weapon, and if such election is made for any taxable year, no deduction shall be allowed under any other provision of this chapter with respect to the surrender or contribution of the specified assault weapon.

The tax credit is taken over two years, 1/2 in each year, and the bill expires after two years so only one weapon could be turned in. That said many of these weapons do not cost even close to $2000 so a person could come out ahead.

Lollypat70

(4 posts)
5. I agree completely with petronius
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 07:02 PM
Apr 2015

The people who turn in their assault guns/rifles for the 2K tax credit will come out ahead of the game, money-wise, and just use the cash to buy another assault weapon! And YES, the government has better things to do with OUR money!
BTW I think his/her signature line is great.

aikoaiko

(34,185 posts)
6. Buy Delton AR for $500, turn it in, buy two Colt 6920s and profit.
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 07:17 PM
Apr 2015


Or maybe just one LaRue or DD or LMT.

I love this idea.

metalbot

(1,058 posts)
7. That's a really funny bill on a couple levels
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 08:04 PM
Apr 2015

Here's the actual bill for anyone interested:

http://delauro.house.gov/images/pdf/SAFERStreetsAct114th.pdf

Aside from the fact that millions of gun owners would look at this as an opportunity to screw the federal government for $1700 (the tax credit minus the cost of a HiPoint Carbine that is explicitly listed in the bill), you'd have people who would otherwise have never bought a gun go buy one to take advantage of the tax credit. I'm imagining the little tax kiosks that are set up at Walmart every year, and an accountant saying "Oh - you haven't taken your firearm deduction! Go down to the hunting section, by a HiPoint, drop it off at the police station, and come back tomorrow with your paperwork".

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
8. Cue gun nuts to argue the definition of 'assault weapons.'
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 09:02 PM
Apr 2015

...and to parrot NRA talking points on a liberal forum.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
9. Seems pretty irrelevant in this case
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 09:05 PM
Apr 2015

Last edited Wed Apr 8, 2015, 02:25 PM - Edit history (1)

Since it is not mandatory and I am sure they won't be picky about it.


 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
13. Right on cue.
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 05:58 PM
Apr 2015

Is there some function on DU that I do not know about that alerts members when a gun h#%*&r is needed?

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
10. Shit, doesn't the Bushmaster only cost like $500?
Mon Apr 6, 2015, 10:35 PM
Apr 2015

I'd buy as many as I could get my hands on and make a tidy profit.

 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
11. Reading the text of the bill...
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 02:08 PM
Apr 2015

You could turn in an AR-15 receiver. Those can be found for <$100.

NickB79

(19,277 posts)
12. Hell, you can buy a .22 rifle that LOOKS like an assault rifle for $200
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 04:26 PM
Apr 2015
http://www.mossberg.com/product/rifles-autoloading-autoloading-rimfire-mossberg-international-715t-715t-flat-top/37207

FYI, that gun is chambered in .22LR, and is only powerful enough to legally hunt squirrels and rabbits with.

I bet you could get them to accept that, and pocket $1800.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»DeLauro: Pay people $2,00...