Valerie Plame calls Judith Miller "pathetic and self-serving" over Iraq column
Source: Mashable
America's most famous former spy and a fallen-star New York Times writer have started a new round of smacktalk over a topic that has 2003 written all over it: Who's to blame for the U.S. invasion of Iraq?
Judy Miller and Valerie Plame Wilson have re-litigated the question of war over the past week in op-ed pages and on Facebook and Twitter. It became personal.
"I took America to war in Iraq. It was all me," Miller wrote in a commentary in the the Wall Street Journal.
In response, Plame derided Miller's articles on Facebook as "cheering from the sidelines" and her attempt at recovering her legacy "pathetic and self-serving."
Read more: http://mashable.com/2015/04/07/iraq-war-debate-origins/
From Plame's Facebook page:
Dear Judy,
No one is crediting you with starting the Iraq war. We know you were not
actually on the team that took us into the biggest, most tragic US foreign
policy debacle ever. You were just cheering from the sidelines. Your
attempt to re-write history is both pathetic and self-serving.
Sincerely,
Valerie Plame
Of course, Disgraced Judy got another job through wingnut welfare - she's now the media ethics watchdog (seriously) for FOX:
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)total failure. Will it change the fact the invasion was wrong and we can not turn back the clock, put the genies back in the bottles and say it never happened but then maybe we could work to clean up the mess the US has created. Now they want to place the blame on everyone but those guilty.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)Because "we have to fight them over there so we won't fight them over here". And Freedom. Free-Dumb, indeed.
rpannier
(24,345 posts)still_one
(92,454 posts)themselves for their shoddy reporting, and intentionally pushing us into war
Judy Miller/scooter libby and PNAC
She was the start of the reputable downgrade of the NY Times.
Of course now she is working for Murdock
father founding
(619 posts)People Not Actually Conscious?
still_one
(92,454 posts)The Wizard
(12,552 posts)the Bush cartel to use the Times to promote the cartel's war for profit.
vlakitti
(401 posts)She absolutely had to know at the time the whole congeries of sources she used were a fraud. Everyone in this country with half a brain knew it and a number of massive antiwar demonstrations took place before Bush started his invasion of Iraq. They were just basically informed.
If I, out here on the Pacific Coast, and million of others scattered throughout this country, knew the whole thing was a frame-up and a fraud from beginning to end, the New York Times editors should have had something of a clue as to what was happening. They knew a lot better and they opted to blind themselves.
Ms. Judith Miller has been humiliated for her behavior, perfectly correctly, and the Time's brand is pretty permanently scarred. They pandered to Bush and they guessed wrong.
Skittles
(153,226 posts)THAT LYING PIECE OF SHIT NEEDS TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE
Cha
(297,818 posts)father founding
(619 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)And our media in general was bought and paid for. That's pathetic.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)That's the bit of this that keeps getting swept under the rug, IMO. Plame was outed because of her work to monitor Iran's WMD programs.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Told about going to war with Iraq. It turns out Wilson told the truth.
Judi Lynn
(160,649 posts)Javaman
(62,534 posts)samsingh
(17,602 posts)Martin Eden
(12,880 posts)That would be like appointing climate denier Jim Inhofe chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee!!!
Yes, I know we're talking about Faux News and the Republican Party, but it's still bizarro world shit.