Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 04:26 PM Apr 2015

Putin says US helped North Caucasus separatists against Russia in the 2000s

Source: Associated Press

Intercepted calls showed that the US helped separatists in Russia’s North Caucasus in the 2000s, Russian president Vladimir Putin claimed in a new documentary in which he underscored his suspicions of the west.

...

The documentary shows Putin interviewed at the Kremlin in the dimly lit St Alexander’s Hall. In excerpts released shortly before the film’s broadcast, Putin said Russian intelligence agencies had intercepted calls between the separatists and US intelligence based in Azerbaijan during the early 2000s, proving that Washington was helping the insurgents.

...

Putin said he raised the issue with then-US President George W Bush, who promised Putin he would “kick the ass” of the intelligence officers in question. But in the end, Putin said the Russian intelligence agency FSB received a letter from their “American counterparts” who asserted their right to “support all opposition forces in Russia”, including the Islamic separatists in the Caucasus.

Putin also expressed his fears that the west wishes Russia harm as he recalled how some world leaders told him they would not mind Russia’s possible disintegration.

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/26/putin-us-helped-north-caucasus-separatists-russia-bush



Chechen Terrorists and the Neocons

...

For instance, see this 2004 article in the UK Guardian, entitled, “The Chechens’ American friends: The Washington neocons’ commitment to the war on terror evaporates in Chechnya, whose cause they have made their own.”

Author John Laughland wrote: “the leading group which pleads the Chechen cause is the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (ACPC). The list of the self-styled ‘distinguished Americans’ who are its members is a roll call of the most prominent neoconservatives who so enthusiastically support the ‘war on terror.’

“They include Richard Perle, the notorious Pentagon adviser; Elliott Abrams of Iran-Contra fame; Kenneth Adelman, the former US ambassador to the UN who egged on the invasion of Iraq by predicting it would be ‘a cakewalk’; Midge Decter, biographer of Donald Rumsfeld and a director of the rightwing Heritage Foundation; Frank Gaffney of the militarist Centre for Security Policy; Bruce Jackson, former US military intelligence officer and one-time vice-president of Lockheed Martin, now president of the US Committee on Nato; Michael Ledeen of the American Enterprise Institute, a former admirer of Italian fascism and now a leading proponent of regime change in Iran; and R. James Woolsey, the former CIA director who is one of the leading cheerleaders behind George Bush’s plans to re-model the Muslim world along pro-US lines.”

The ACPC later sanitized “Chechnya” to “Caucasus” so it’s rebranded itself as the “American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus.”

...

Coleen Rowley is a retired FBI agent and former chief division counsel in Minneapolis. She’s now a dedicated peace and justice activist and board member of the Women Against Military Madness.

https://consortiumnews.com/2013/04/19/chechen-terrorists-and-the-neocons/
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Putin says US helped North Caucasus separatists against Russia in the 2000s (Original Post) jakeXT Apr 2015 OP
The US has a finger (and a blood funnel) in every pie Demeter Apr 2015 #1
Well, we got some bangs out of it cosmicone Apr 2015 #2
wouldn't surprise me if the Clintons had some of this :( N/T PatrynXX Apr 2015 #3
Yep n/t Squantoish Apr 2015 #4
huh? cosmicone Apr 2015 #5
It is the American deep state AngryAmish Apr 2015 #7
AngryAmish Diclotican Apr 2015 #9
Putin has been using Chechnan hitmen for a while. AngryAmish Apr 2015 #14
Well gee, isn't that a neutral source. NuclearDem Apr 2015 #6
Now the Associated Press is no longer considered a reasonable source? What Purveyor Apr 2015 #10
People who excessively post Sputnik and RT NuclearDem Apr 2015 #11
Yeah, that was a lame distraction trying to accuse you of not accepting AP as a source when it was Cha Apr 2015 #18
Anything that tells him "MURKA! FUCK YEAH!" Scootaloo Apr 2015 #12
Because the butcher of Grozny would never lie to justify his war. NuclearDem Apr 2015 #15
That Putin committed war crimes in Chechnya does not mean we weren't involved in there Scootaloo Apr 2015 #16
That Putin alleges the US was involved there doesn't mean the US was involved there. NuclearDem Apr 2015 #17
+1 SkyDaddy7 Apr 2015 #20
Don't confuse the source of the information Igel Apr 2015 #13
jakeXT Diclotican Apr 2015 #8
Is there any evidence to support Putin's claim? Comrade Grumpy Apr 2015 #19
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
1. The US has a finger (and a blood funnel) in every pie
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 04:29 PM
Apr 2015

and everybody in the world knows this, except the American people. I'm not sure why...plausible deniability, or the chance that the People would object to current foreign policy?

The lesson of Vietnam still scares the govt. It may never get over it, and learn the real meaning: don't do evil!

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
2. Well, we got some bangs out of it
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 04:45 PM
Apr 2015

i.e. Boston marathon bombing by Chechen terrorists.

Shooting ourselves in the foot is something we are so good at!

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
7. It is the American deep state
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 06:13 PM
Apr 2015

The particular administration has little to do with these career administrators,syate dept, cia etc, the various pro democracy think tanks, etc.

For a long time the USA has had a very sensible immigration attitude for Chechens...we don't let any in. For good reason, Chechens are nuts.

The Boston Bombers have some connection to various deep state officials through their uncle Ruslen.

Diclotican

(5,095 posts)
9. AngryAmish
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 07:13 PM
Apr 2015

AngryAmish

You are right about Chechen's being nuts - they are maybe some of the best warriors around - something they show clearly in the 1990s - when Russia twice used the full force of the army - and got kicked out of the Republic as the russian army, air force and special forces was treated as the enemies they was - and where the tjetsjen leaders was clever using all the tools of the trade - knowing the territory as they own back hand and therefore being able to inflict as much pain as human possible on russian forces... For Russians it was a horrible time where soldiers was killed left, right and center - even if they used some of the most heavy handed approach possible for the russian forces... The first war was known for their shelling of the capital Grozny - the next war a few years after - was known for doing the same, to make it even worse for the civilians - Grozny was a ruin heap for the most part after two wars where russian forces had bombing the city to ruins - and where civilians was treated horrible - ten of thousands ended up as refugees - others was refugees inside their own country - others had to leave for the mountains - as guerrilla fighters - or to areas who was to remote for the russian army to try to conquer again....

The current russian-led dictator of Chetchenia - is supported by the russian federations - and is clearly a friend of the current Russian President - and have managed to "govern" his principality as best he is able - by using excessive force to quell all form of Resistance against the current leaders in the republic - and he have also being able to rebuild Grozny - thanks to large sums given by the russian federations - even if they are been a price for it all - the current leaders and leadership, is a brutal one - no democracy there - rather a brutal regime where all form of Resistance have been treated horrible - killing, maiming and in so many cases - people leaving as refugees - and then be killed abroad - or in other parts of the Russian Federation when they are not news-worthy anymore...

Not to say - Chechen's have for a long time - in fact going centuries back - been used as bodyguards - and assassins by the russian government - they are brutal - effective - and is not caring about collateral damage either.. But they are known for being able to do what they is ordered to be doing... and is also known as loyal - as long as they is getting their money....

Diclotican

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
14. Putin has been using Chechnan hitmen for a while.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:01 PM
Apr 2015

The best warriors around...Chechens v Ghurkhas v Mexican Zetas.

If we could get them together. And leave the civilized alone.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
6. Well gee, isn't that a neutral source.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 06:08 PM
Apr 2015


Russia blames its problems on the US. Up next, Pope still Catholic.
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
10. Now the Associated Press is no longer considered a reasonable source? What
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 07:35 PM
Apr 2015

is your preference, Fox News or Ukraine Today?

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
11. People who excessively post Sputnik and RT
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 07:49 PM
Apr 2015

shouldn't accuse others of bias.

Not surprised you missed the point that I was referring to Putin--whose allegations the AP was reporting.

But hey, carry on.

Cha

(297,872 posts)
18. Yeah, that was a lame distraction trying to accuse you of not accepting AP as a source when it was
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 12:26 AM
Apr 2015

clearly putin you were referring to. Anyone would know that except the laughable putin protectors.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
15. Because the butcher of Grozny would never lie to justify his war.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:54 PM
Apr 2015

Nope, it must be true.

And Iraq was connected to 9/11.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
17. That Putin alleges the US was involved there doesn't mean the US was involved there.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 11:17 PM
Apr 2015

Hell, the US probably was to some extent. But I'd like very much to see people here not falling over themselves to believe every word that comes out of Putin's mouth about the US.

SkyDaddy7

(6,045 posts)
20. +1
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 02:49 AM
Apr 2015

I learned long ago it does not matter how disgusting or evil the dictator is he will always have his supporters here on DU...These same people will claim to be strong defenders of "Liberal Values". smh.

Igel

(35,382 posts)
13. Don't confuse the source of the information
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 08:47 PM
Apr 2015

with the source of the quotes.

AP is the source of the quotations. But Putin is the source of the information in the quotations. It's not like the AP is vouching for the truth of Putin's every word any more than it vouches for the truth of words spoken by other politicians.

The story is that Putin spoke and uttered certain words. That's as far as the AP's truth-telling goes.

What's amusing is that Putin speaks and people believe it must be so. Meanwhile, there are tanks and weapons systems never possessed by Ukraine being used in the Donbas that almost certainly came from Russia (with everything but the prerequisite chain of custody and paper trail with equipment serial numbers). And, again, Putin speaks so it must be so.

Makes me feel like crossing myself and saying, "In the name of the Lenin, the Stalin and the Holy Putie-Poot" while facing east towards the true source of all Russian Christianity, the Crimea.

Diclotican

(5,095 posts)
8. jakeXT
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 07:00 PM
Apr 2015

jakeXT

To be honest - Russia have had its share of making Tsjetsjenia a proving ground for extremists - as the country have always been rather heavy-handed in its approach to the republic - and the two wars in the 1990s was not exactly making any friends to russia in the area - rather the opposite...

But I'm not surprised if US have poked its nose into the soft underbelly of Russia also - as it was stated already 150 years ago - when the Imperial Russia and UK was fighting for supremacy in the area - and it was a statement who still is valid - as the whole Caucasus is a rather messy area, where no one really have control - and where specially Russia have been bleed dry many times - when they have tried to enforce its will - and the enemy as it was, have hurt them badly - and even at the best of times - the different republics inside the Russian Federations have been rather autonomous - at the worst of times - the whole area have been lawless - and ruled by old traditions and rules who is ancient as the time itself....

But then - ACPC and the Neo-cons have always tried to mess up things - regardless how it is - to make things worse - they have been rather clever doing it with horrible consequences for the ones who live in Caucasus - and for large areas around this area... Who still, for the most part is ruled by traditions and customs who people outside of the area have great problems understanding - but who is understood clearly by the ones who live inside the area... It is, in a matter the last "lawless" frontier of Europe - as Caucasus still is part of Europe - even if it have evolved largely outside of anything european... Or maybe it is the rest of Europe who have evolved different from Caucasus as the area have been rather closed off from the rest of Europe...

To touch Caucasus without knowing its history - and how its really work - is outright stupidity if you ask me... The best is to do less to mess up things in Caucasus -rather than trying to impose something that the people of the area would not... They have a tendency to be rather independent that way....

Diclotican

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Putin says US helped Nort...