Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
Mon Jun 11, 2012, 11:53 PM Jun 2012

Navy drone crashes in Maryland, no injuries reported

Source: Alabama news site

A U.S. Navy done crashed into a marsh near Salisbury, Md. around noon Monday during a routine training flight from Naval Air Station Patuxent River, CNN is reporting.

The report says Navy personnel discovered the crash after sending a pilot to search for the aircraft after losing contact with the unmanned RQ-4A Global Hawk drone. Reuters reports that model of drone is 44 feet long and was a demonstrator model still in development.

The drone, worth $176 million, is able to fly without refueling for 30 hours at altitudes as high as 11 miles.

The Washington Post reports no one was injured during the crash and no property damage occurred.


Read more: http://blog.al.com/montgomery/2012/06/navy_drone_crashes_in_maryland.html#incart_river_default



No problem with pilotless drones flying around the USA, eh?

A $176 million dollar THUD.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Navy drone crashes in Maryland, no injuries reported (Original Post) dixiegrrrrl Jun 2012 OP
They fly a lot of drones and experimental aircraft around Pax Naval Station HipChick Jun 2012 #1
Who cares about injuries DJ13 Jun 2012 #2
Gamer at naval base loses 1000 points! longship Jun 2012 #3
I hope they can figure out the error. boppers Jun 2012 #4
Dupe... MADem Jun 2012 #5
drats..I HAD looked for a previous story dixiegrrrrl Jun 2012 #7
It's happened to me as well! nt MADem Jun 2012 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jun 2012 #6
Do you actually believe they don't have to test-fly these things? PavePusher Jun 2012 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jun 2012 #10
If they are doing so.... PavePusher Jun 2012 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author bupkus Jun 2012 #12
Spying on the Eastern Shore? JaneQPublic Jun 2012 #13

boppers

(16,588 posts)
4. I hope they can figure out the error.
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 12:46 AM
Jun 2012

176 million ain't cheap. Still better than losing one pilot, IMO.

Response to dixiegrrrrl (Original post)

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
9. Do you actually believe they don't have to test-fly these things?
Tue Jun 12, 2012, 05:38 PM
Jun 2012

DO you think they come from some magical place fully mission-ready?

DO you know anything about maintenance of any machinery at all?

Response to PavePusher (Reply #9)

Response to PavePusher (Reply #11)

JaneQPublic

(7,113 posts)
13. Spying on the Eastern Shore?
Wed Jun 13, 2012, 04:49 PM
Jun 2012

Were they hoping to find out what all those Chesapeake waterman use for crab bait?

Seriously, I live right next to NAS Patuxent River (the source of the crashed UAV). On a clear day, there are all sorts of aircraft in the sky: P-3, F/A-18, C-40, V-22, dozens of helicopters, and, yes, UAVs (what the media call "drones.&quot Are you equally suspicious that the fighter aircraft are actually being flown to attack commercial airliners? How about the P-3, since it has surveillance gear, too. Do you suppose it's been spying on the American public since it was first launched -- in the early 1960s?

The aircraft are flown for training, maintenance check-flights, and just so pilots can get in flight-hours. They've been doing that for decades here before there was ever a "drone."

Look here for the restricted flight zone (that's been more or less the same since WWII):
http://vfrmap.com/?type=vfrc&lat=38.286&lon=-76.410&zoom=10

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Navy drone crashes in Mar...