Group vies to make homosexuality a crime in Maine
Source: Bangor Daily News
AUGUSTA, Maine Mike Heath and other former heads of the Christian Civic League of Maine have formed a new group, Equal Rights, not Special Rights, in an effort to remove protections for LGBT Mainers from the Maine Equal Rights Act.
They said theyre tired of being forced to accept the homosexual lifestyle.
Paul Madore and this small group of people say they want to restore America to its former greatness by repealing same sex marriage laws and making homosexuality a crime.
There is conduct that ought to be punished, Heath said. And Christianity teaches, has always taught and still does teach, that sodomy is such a behavior.
<more>
Read more: http://bangordailynews.com/2016/07/09/news/state/group-vies-to-make-homosexuality-a-crime-in-maine/
Doodley
(9,179 posts)I can only think of one reason why Mike Heath and Paul Madore would be so afraid of gays. Maybe there is something they need to tell us.
jpak
(41,761 posts)yup
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... and explained it to me. What better way for someone to "convince" others that they're not gay than by persecuting homosexuals.
Something tells me that these two fellows probably think about "gay sex" MORE than open homosexuals think about "gay sex" themselves.
Doodley
(9,179 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,784 posts)with all due respect, Your Holiness, Rick Santorum has to be the least gay person alive.
Even if you have brand new tubes in your gaydar detector and just had it aligned, it won't register anything with him.
keithbvadu2
(37,062 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,082 posts)That sucked.
King_David
(14,851 posts)What is an " open homosexual "?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)It's often hard to read someone's tone and intent when it's just quickly typed text on a screen, so I compliment you on being able to understand what I was saying.
King_David
(14,851 posts)Is "Gay sex" different from sex?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)one would call it Psychological Projection.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
Doodley
(9,179 posts)Randomly slaughters people in a gay night club, turns out he was gay.
Time and time again, the most outspoken homophobic clergy and politicians have turned out to be gay.
King_David
(14,851 posts)He was married twiceto women.
He professed his allegiance to Islamic extremists.
He stalked women.
The only male to come foreword and say he had a relationship ,with was discredited by the FBI.
He used gay dating apps and visited this single Gay club to research his target.
This was more likely a straight mass murderer than a Gay one- where do you get that from?
villager
(26,001 posts)...stuffed away somewhere, that they're "sneaking" glances at...
King_David
(14,851 posts)In fact it's a disgusting assumption , as if your telling us all they just as "bad" as homosexuals and they are just hiding it.
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)I thinks its a homophobic slur to infer "closet case" for each asshole who does some anti gay shit.
King_David
(14,851 posts)Homophobic. Thank you !
spartan61
(2,091 posts)Why are they "being forced to accept the homosexual lifestyle?" It doesn't affect their lives. Christianity teaches so much more than sodomy is a behavior. It also teaches "Love thy neighbor as thyself." What a bunch of freaken hypocrites. I would love to see how they would react if one of their beloved children came out as gay. The Bible also teaches not to eat shellfish. No more lobsters for you!!!!
Doodley
(9,179 posts)brett_jv
(1,245 posts)Telling me these guys have never done ANY oral with their lady-friends, cause it's a SIN? NEVER gotten a BJ, huh?
Bullshit. Pfft.
And they probably fantasize about getting some anal but their wives won't go for it (probably cause they're jerks and generally selfish, uncaring lovers).
They also probably LOVE them some girl-on-girl pronz too.
As a side note, I'm fairly certain there's a decent-sized contingent of gay couples who do not perform (these guys definition of sodomy), I just have to wonder ... are those ones 'okay' in their book, cause they aren't 'Sodomites'? I somehow doubt it.
Bottom-line, these hypocritical a-holes need to STFU.
phylny
(8,397 posts)"done any oral" ON their wives or girlfriends.
allan01
(1,950 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)bears its fangs to demand universal obedience to its doctrines. Nothing new in that. Despite all their other shortcomings, the ancient Romans dealt with this sort of thing using coliseums and lions. We already have the coliseums.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Some 'militant people.'
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)ran Europe. They spent centuries burning witches and heretics and slaughtering untold numbers of people in decades long wars over church doctrine. Religious sects in Islam have been murdering each other for 1500 years. In Palestine, the second invasion of Canaan is on with the blessing of Yhwh and is being resisted in the name of Allah. There's a lot more going on than just the actions of 'some militant people.'
pangaia
(24,324 posts)None of them, not one, exhibits the type of behavior you describe.
So, maybe the ultimate problem really IS people.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)religions are actually wonderful and the people actually made by the creator contain the actual defects. This borders on heresy, if we are being religious, to put human creation above the creation of God negates the entire premise of religion, does it not?
I think it can be challenging and painful for any community to confront the worst aspects of its culture or the worst persons among them, but I also think that refusing to do so on the basis that you or your pals don't personally oppress LGBT serves the worst elements in any community or culture.
This OP, by the way, is about actively sought laws to oppress LGBT pitched by religious people. Any actual righteous person of faith would need to see those being harmed as the important factor in the story. A faith that says 'attitudes toward me are more important than actions against others' is empty and without value of any kind.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)exhibit the behaviors I describe probably aren't your friends. That does not imply they are either in or not in the majority. It is generally not considered sound reasoning to infer general conclusions based upon the limited sample of one's own experience.
Were I to make my own questionable inference it would be that bad religious people have a lot more political clout than good ones.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)the myths going with obedient flocks. It's been that way for ages and it's a happy ground for authoritarian types as a controlling mechanism for the masses, and for many a nice cushy income.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)and totally unconscious. In my opinion "religion" is all a terribly distorted, watered-down version of the teaching of some truths... made easy for the masses. Like the old Readers' Digest.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,089 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)my opinion, they are not Christians.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)The fact that they're raving bigots does not mean they can't be.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,089 posts)keithbvadu2
(37,062 posts)living room wall his picture is hanging.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)One is just a never version. Jesus was a Galilean Jew, a mixed race lot held in only slightly less contempt than Samaritans by 'real' Jews. He could have looked like either image portrayed. What difference does it make? The Romans were completely colorblind when it came to crucifixion.
bucolic_frolic
(43,560 posts)Takeover of Maine's gay resorts on the cheap?
uawchild
(2,208 posts)Wasn't a adamantly anti-gay Catholic Bishop just up on charges for using his position to force several gay priests to have sex with him?
Aristus
(66,531 posts)There's a term I hadn't heard in a while; and hoped I would never hear again.
Hey assholes!: They're always special rights when someone else wants them. It's only when we want them that they become civil rights...
sinkingfeeling
(51,501 posts)Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)I will NEVER set foot in a church again. This is what Christianity in America has become.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)looked good when he was a candidate in many political elections, and he won. I thought it was creepy as a youth, and they threatened to kick me out of Sunday School because I asked questions, and the other kids were listening to me, and started questioning WTF is this crap about. Someone tells me they've got religion and all the red flags go up for me.
eShirl
(18,511 posts)They've always been dedicated to forcing everyone to follow their "morals" by putting them into law. They usually lose.
SusanLarson
(284 posts)Guess they never heard of equal protection of the law and federal preemption.
SusanLarson
(284 posts)If its removed, what does it do? Heath said. It very simply moves something, a behavior that belongs in the closet back into the closet.
As a transsexual I can tell them right now that nothing will ever put me back in the closet, you will have to kill me first!
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)They can't have it both ways. Either sodomy is akin to, say, murder and you can't do it even in the closet, or what they want isn't to criminalize homosexuality, just keep from seeing or hearing about it. In which case, it's not a crime to engage in it, just to be public about it....
I mean, it's illegal for anyone, heterosexual or not, to have sex in a public place. So...if all they really want is for homosexuality to remain secret, then what they're really arguing for is to restrain free speech. If, of course, on the other hand they want to criminalize homosexuality, then they have to prove why it should be a crime, and "because it's in the Bible" doesn't suffice. Because, well, other amendment about freedom of religion. They can't impose their religious beliefs on others or use those beliefs to create laws that do likewise.
By the by, I'm just riffing away on this quote. Fact of the matter is that there is never any common sense in demands like these--the ones crying out about "special privileges" and their freedoms being denied in giving others their freedom. What they say and argue always boils down to the same thing: getting rid of anything that makes them feel uncomfortable, or takes away their power to be exactly they way they want to be (bigoted) whether that is right or not. Whether that is fair or not. Whether that is legal or not. Whether that is constitutional or not.
It's nonsense. It's always nonsense. And here's hoping that most citizens of Maine agree.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts).
arithia
(455 posts)You mean like you are trying to force others to accept your interpretation of Christianity as the only way to live their lives?
Fuck you, Mike Heath.
Judge not lest ye fucking be judged and worry about that log in your eye before you harp on others about their splinter. Did ya miss that part of the Bible before you used it to balance a coffee table leg?
... please pardon the swearing. I have no filter for selfish, conceited, tone deaf assholes like this.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)is like a club, and it fosters hatred for others, persecution and inane beliefs. I find religion disgusting. Not all religion is that way, but IMO a good portion is. Religion is also used as a controlling device, for example, look at politicians that find religion when they run for office. FFS people, get into the 21st century. Drop your superstitious beliefs and ancient teachings, or at minimal leave the rest of us the fuck along. We don't want to be part of your club, it's disgusting!
arithia
(455 posts)Most people who study religion- actual historians, anthropologists and theologians alike- can agree that faith is a personal matter. That MAN wrote every holy book every written. That faith is belief in the absence of any kind of physical proof.
We alter religious doctrine, all the time, for social and political reasons. I can't tell ya how many times I've argued with people about how absolute the "word of God" is. Like it's not the King James VERSION of the Bible vs the translations of the original. "Virgin" at the time of Mary meant any young woman of age to wed and not her sexual status, yet people continue to superimpose their modern meaning of the word in order to suit their purposes.
But, thats what this is all about. God is a convenient argument from authority. They don't have to defend their beliefs or even justify em... just pass the buck to a being that may or may not actually exist and certainly isn't gonna show up in person to defend their point of view.
Personally? I think if we have a creator, they have better sh*t to do than worry about consensual sex between loving adults.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)question and/or validate that authority. ... because God said so.
And the guppies will believe. Pass the contribution plate, please.
mainer
(12,037 posts)Because they know they've already lost the war.
LiberalFighter
(51,397 posts)Nobody is forcing them to be homosexual. Just like nobody is forced to be a different race.
Interesting how they say "has always taught" which is a lie.
treestar
(82,383 posts)And furthermore, the Supreme Court has ruled. Maine cannot make a statute inconsistent with that.
cagefreesoylentgreen
(838 posts)How are they "being forced to accept the homosexual lifestyle"? Do they get invitations to gay orgies stuffed in the front door of their house like pizza ads?
Anyway good luck with trying to criminalize gays in the US. Maybe they should move to Iran where those laws are already on the books.
keithbvadu2
(37,062 posts)God created gays fully knowing they would be gay.
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)not a How To book?
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)But thank you for playing!
Johnny's got some great consolation prizes for you...
PersonNumber503602
(1,134 posts)I think they may confused about the definitions of the words equal and special.
seanbnewyork4
(32 posts)Frankly, they are only making a fool of themselves by creating such a bigoted group. They should just accept the fact that their backward views are being rejected by more and more Americans.
phylny
(8,397 posts)divorced heterosexual couple lifestyle, or is that for next year?
Skittles
(153,321 posts)fuck these sanctimonious fools
olddad56
(5,732 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Idiots.