U.S. Postal Workers On Hunger Strike June 27, 2012
Source: Addicting Information
Extreme times require extreme measures. In the United States, hunger strikes are rarely seen, but Post Office employees have about had it with measures passed by Congress that are slowly starving the United States Postal Service. On Monday, ten current and retired workers began a four-day hunger strike that will end on Thursday in front of the postal service headquarters. There, they hope to meet with Postmaster General Patrick Donohoe.
The motivation for the hunger strike can be found in the National Call to Action put out by the Community and Postal Workers United organization. The call makes it evident just how outrageous the treatment of the USPS has been. It says, Americas Postal Service is being starved to death. A 2006 Congressional mandate forces the USPS to pre-fund retiree health benefits 75 years in advance. 10% of the postal budget, $5.5 billion per year, goes to pre-fund benefits for people who arent even born yet. Not only would the postal service have been profitable without the mandate, the USPS has also over paid tens of billions into two pension funds.
These outrageous demands, unheard of in any other sector, are an obvious effort by Congress to eliminate a public service in order to privatize mail delivery. The Postmaster General is cooperating by proposing cuts in services, the closure of postal facilities, and the elimination of thousands of jobs. The workers are trying to highlight these appalling actions to the public by shaming Congress and denouncing the Postmaster Generals initiatives. They want the pre-fund mandate lifted and the over-payments to pension funds refunded.
Will the hunger strike work? Eighty years ago, it worked for Mahatma Gandhi, who undertook a fast unto death for six days, in order to stand up to British colonialists on behalf of the untouchablesthe lowest class in Indias once-rigid caste system. Over a 16-year period, Gandhi continued to use fasts as a primary means of civil disobedience, aware that the concern of the public for his well-being would force the British government to make concessions. More than concessions, Gandhis actions contributed to the independence of India.
Read more: http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/06/27/u-s-postal-workers-on-hunger-strike/
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)At least according to the Community & Postal Workers United site.
Of course, it's been leading the corporate news every night since it started.
Not.
(I tried to endorse the strike but couldn't. I guess that's why.)
Slit Skirt
(1,789 posts)very proud of him!
midnight
(26,624 posts)"There can be no peace so long as hunger and want are found among millions of working people and the few, who make up the employing class, have all the good things in life." Mother Jones...
midnight
(26,624 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Telling the few people reading this thread that I endorse the strike only does so much good.
When I tried to register my endorsement, the message said: Registration is closed for this event.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)midnight
(26,624 posts)Mandated by the US constitution as a service vital to democracy, the post office has fallen victim to structural adjustment as well as to electronic communication. Congress has successively demanded that the US Postal Service run itself more like a business since making it a quasi-corporation in 1971. Required to provide universal service, even as the internet and private carriers cut into its profit centres, the USPS has spun into a death spiral, raising its rates as it slashes employment and service. It's now stripping its assets, as well.
Since January, the US Postal Service has closed 280 post offices, despite community resistance and the objections of local business people horrified to watch downtown magnets decamp for peripheral strip malls and trailers. Those closures were only a warmup for what was coming. On 26 July, Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe listed nearly 3,700 more, saying "The Postal Service of the future will be smaller, leaner, and more competitive." Those facilities constitute well over a tenth of the nation's post offices, buildings that once physically embodied government honesty, efficiency and even culture. Perhaps, that is why they must go.
The distinguished Modesto building, like many other New Deal post offices, has earned a place on the National Register of Historic Places, but a buyer could still demolish it to utilise the real estate beneath it. In that case, law requires the developer to donate its murals to the federal government. But as Congress and the White House hack ever deeper into the services that Americans until recently took for granted, no one may be at home in Washington to find lodging for such art other than that for which it was made.
New Deal critic Amity Shlaes has claimed that "It's not really the government's business, art, is it?" Roosevelt shared with other New Dealers a considerably more expansive notion of what the US could achieve. He forecast that "one hundred years from now, my administration will be known for its art, not for its relief." The New Dealers envisioned a new Renaissance. Its successors are knocking that legacy down to the highest bidder, and with it goes what we once were and might yet be.http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/aug/02/us-post-office-new-deal
So why would Congress want to run our Post Office like a business?
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Meanwhile, we've got a Constitutional scholar as president who's ordering extra-judicial drone attacks and keeping people incarcerated without charge or trial.
In short, the Constitution don't get no respect.