Obama threatens to veto defense appropriations bill
Source: The Hill
The Houses defense appropriations bill on Thursday joined the list of spending bills that the White House has threatened to veto over the caps in the Budget Control Act (BCA).
The Obama administration said Thursday that it would recommend a veto of the current version of the measure because it violated the spending caps set in the BCA.
The Houses defense bill that passed the committee last month had a base budget of $519 billion, which was about $3 billion above the Obama administrations budget request. The House made spending cuts elsewhere in the non-defense discretionary budget to allow for the increased defense spending, which Republicans say is necessary to lessen the risk from $487 billion in cuts over the next decade to the defense budget due to the BCA caps.
By adding unrequested funding for defense, the House of Representatives departs from the bipartisan understanding reached a year ago, the Office of Management and Budget wrote in a statement of administration policy.
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hill/budget-appropriations/235463-obama-threatens-to-veto-defense-appropriations-bill
Iggy
(1,418 posts)I suspect a number of "democrats" in congress who typically have their slobbery lips attached to the big
arse of the MIC-- just because they provide a few "jobs" in their districts, are responsible for the
bloated 2013 defense budget.
Obama needs to deal strongly with these buffoons.
maddezmom
(135,060 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)By adding unrequested funding for defense, the House of Representatives departs from the bipartisan understanding reached a year ago.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)that could cut Defense Spending.
The ONLY other one that could even have tried prior to him was Truman.
eyewall
(674 posts)He went from an inherited defense budget of $435 billion to a low of $374 billion.
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2011/07/historical_defense_budget.html
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2011/07/img/historical_defense_budget_charts.html
Lasher
(27,687 posts)Bush 41s secretary of defense explained that overall, since I've been secretary, we will have taken the five-year defense program down by well over $300 billion. That's the peace dividend. And now we're adding to that another $50 billion of so-called peace dividend. That defense secretary, of course, was Dick Cheney.
http://www.factcheck.org/more_mitt_missteps.html
Republicans have always been fond of saying Clinton gutted the military. It's just another plain lie.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)he was accused by the Right Wing of being a draft dodger.
Obama killed bin Laden so his credentials are better in this era where facts don't matter and history in Washington is what Republicans claim it to be. As far as they're concerned, Reagan brought down the Soviet Union with massive increases in defense spending and the Soviets couldn't keep up. That's a FACT in their world. Tell them different and you are a hippie. Any effort to cut defense spending is "gutting the military" and is a slap in the face of all who fight and die for the red white and blue. (cue national anthem and put yer hand on yer heart, ya heathen!)
To quote Malloy: Have I mentioned how much I hate these people?
rgbecker
(4,837 posts)Do people forget what happened in Afghanistan to the Russians?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Mihail Gorbacov tried to save it by his reforms including ending the war in Afghanistan and his "new openness" but single party rule ended and thus, it was over. It shows what happens when a political party creates a fictional world that isn't taken seriously outside of the Capital and ignores or dismisses the needs of the people.
Major Nikon
(36,828 posts)magic59
(429 posts)don't wimp out, kick their fascist azz. A police state with perpetual wars is not a good place to live.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)IamK
(956 posts)Sania Haxan
(5 posts)In May, this year, the Pentagon has been under orders to cut spending by $487 billion from projected defense over the next decade