Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 09:56 AM Nov 2017

Barney Frank: English should 'clearly' lead consumer bureau

Source: The Hill




BY BRETT SAMUELS - 11/27/17 08:32 AM EST

Former Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who co-authored the 2010 law that established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), said Monday that Deputy Director Leandra English should "clearly" run the agency amid controversy over the appointment of Mick Mulvaney.

“When we wrote the law creating the CFPB, and we deliberately tried to give it some protection from the normal political process,” Frank said on CNN's "New Day."

English, who was tapped by former Director Richard Cordray to be the acting director, filed a complaint Sunday in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against President Trump and Mulvaney, after the president nominated Mulvaney, the Office of Management and Budget Director, to lead the CFPB.

Passed in 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act established the CFPB and called on the bureau’s deputy director to serve as acting director between Senate-confirmed chiefs. Cordray promoted English, his chief of staff, to the deputy director position shortly before resigning from the bureau on Friday.

Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/finance/361922-barney-frank-english-should-clearly-lead-consumer-bureau

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Barney Frank: English should 'clearly' lead consumer bureau (Original Post) DonViejo Nov 2017 OP
That's the way it looks to me too. MGKrebs Nov 2017 #1
"we deliberately tried to give it some protection from the normal political process" FBaggins Nov 2017 #2
Are they also concerned with how the FBI is structured? MGKrebs Nov 2017 #4
No... and "not at all" FBaggins Nov 2017 #5
I've read more about it and I see that now. MGKrebs Nov 2017 #7
From Prof. Tribe Gothmog Nov 2017 #3
McLeod is the CFPB's counsel, and both "directors" are at work. Hortensis Nov 2017 #6
+1 dalton99a Nov 2017 #8
Everyone knows Republicans screw American consumers FOR Corporate businesses. Sunlei Nov 2017 #9
From my twitter feed Gothmog Nov 2017 #10
The "normal political process" being moondust Nov 2017 #11

MGKrebs

(8,138 posts)
1. That's the way it looks to me too.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 10:28 AM
Nov 2017

The president may get to appoint someone in the event of a vacancy, but there is no vacancy. The asst takes over (interim) if the Director is vacant.

FBaggins

(26,789 posts)
2. "we deliberately tried to give it some protection from the normal political process"
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 10:56 AM
Nov 2017

That's part of the problem. Multiple courts have expressed concern with the CFPB's structure (with the highest to date saying that's it's unconstitutional).

FBaggins

(26,789 posts)
5. No... and "not at all"
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 12:02 PM
Nov 2017

The FBI is part of the DOJ and get's it's funding from Congress and, as part of the Executive Branch, is directly answerable to the President.

MGKrebs

(8,138 posts)
7. I've read more about it and I see that now.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 12:59 PM
Nov 2017

I was thinking of the director being appointed to a term outside of the election cycle.

Still, I'm not sure what would be unconstitutional about it (but I'm no lawyer).

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
6. McLeod is the CFPB's counsel, and both "directors" are at work.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 12:37 PM
Nov 2017

No wonder the usually staid WaPo is referring to a "shootout at the CFPB corral."



Vanity Fair:
The agency, meanwhile, is apparently trapped in limbo. “There is no way for this to get resolved short of court intervention,” Alan Kaplinsky, a lawyer who has represented big banks in lawsuits against the C.F.P.B., told Bloomberg. “The C.F.P.B. will be paralyzed until we figure out who is in charge.”

It was nice to see Barney Frank's name at least. I'd imagine at very least he'll be filing a statement with the court that's decide which law takes precedence.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
9. Everyone knows Republicans screw American consumers FOR Corporate businesses.
Mon Nov 27, 2017, 01:04 PM
Nov 2017

stay the fuck AWAY from Americans consumer protections, Republican party!

moondust

(20,025 posts)
11. The "normal political process" being
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 02:11 AM
Nov 2017

big banks, corporations, and big campaign donors leaning on members of Congress to do their bidding and forget about the consumers it was created to protect.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Barney Frank: English sho...