Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,684 posts)
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 01:16 PM Jan 2018

Democratic congressman introduces "Stable Genius Act"

Source: CBS News

By REBECCA SHABAD CBS NEWS January 9, 2018, 12:00 PM

Democratic Pennsylvania Rep. Brendan Boyle is unveiling a bill called the "Stable Genius Act" that would require all presidential candidates to undergo a medical exam and publicly disclose the results before the election.

The Stabile Genius Act is an acronym for the Standardizing Testing and Accountability Before Large Elections Giving Electors Necessary Information for Unobstructed Selection Act.

Boyle's measure would require nominees of each political party to file a report with the Federal Election Commission certifying that he or she underwent a medical exam by the Secretary of the Navy, which he said must contain the exam's results.

"The President believes he is a 'stable genius.' I do not," Boyle said in a statement. "Before voting for the highest office in the land, Americans have a right to know whether an individual has the physical and mental fitness to serve as President of the United States. While it is necessary to take the current President's concerning behavior seriously and I support legislation to address these ongoing concerns, I believe we must also be proactive and do all we can to ensure a situation like this does not arise again."


Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/democratic-congressman-introduces-stable-genius-act/

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democratic congressman introduces "Stable Genius Act" (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jan 2018 OP
I wonder MyOwnPeace Jan 2018 #1
and, as someone else suggested here, all candidates should have to take the same niyad Jan 2018 #2
Republicans will claim that's unfair to people who IronLionZion Jan 2018 #3
had not thought of that-too bad for them. niyad Jan 2018 #5
Medical only? Usually doesn't include mental capabilities. I'm more interested in that. SharonAnn Jan 2018 #11
Yes, the mental state is more important than physical FakeNoose Jan 2018 #27
Great idea. Never thought I'd think it necessary. But Trump . . . . Sophia4 Jan 2018 #22
The bill is very likely unconstitutional Lurks Often Jan 2018 #4
the constitution does not prevent further qualifications. unblock Jan 2018 #7
Moot point, the bill isn't going to pass Lurks Often Jan 2018 #17
not really, since it doesn't dq a candidate... getagrip_already Jan 2018 #8
That's right. Dave Starsky Jan 2018 #28
... pants-shitting, drooling idiot ... aggiesal Jan 2018 #30
That's where the Electoral College.... SergeStorms Jan 2018 #32
The proposed bill doesn't say that a negative result would be disqualifying. Demit Jan 2018 #9
Have to agree, voters will get what they deserve. Too bad majority of votes doesn't win. harun Jan 2018 #29
Bus drivers and airline pilots undergo more testing than our political leaders. Irish_Dem Jan 2018 #6
Great. You know, I distinctly remember something that his hippy doctor said that Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2018 #10
Im sure Trump dictated, if not personally wrote, that purported evaluation. Shrike47 Jan 2018 #19
I remember it being an interview of the doc Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2018 #34
Great acronym njcpa1978 Jan 2018 #12
Welcome to DU, njcpa1978! calimary Jan 2018 #24
And if we can actually control the House, will we fix the gerrymandering? erronis Jan 2018 #31
For that I think the main remedy is to take back as many governorships as possible. calimary Jan 2018 #33
A federal court yesterday Cold War Spook Jan 2018 #35
I still think "Stable" a subliminal euphemism for stiff bucolic_frolic Jan 2018 #13
If there is a gaggle of geese, maybe genius could also be a collective noun bigbrother05 Jan 2018 #15
That title is a mouthful, can we just call it Donald's Law? marylandblue Jan 2018 #14
how about a rider that requires disclosure of 5+ years of tax returns? 0rganism Jan 2018 #16
Brendan Boyle isn't the representative I'd have thought DeminPennswoods Jan 2018 #18
Well, shit, look what Dianne Feinstein did today! calimary Jan 2018 #25
K&R blue-wave Jan 2018 #20
It should also require Mr.Bill Jan 2018 #21
Should add onto this full income tax filing history and financial records MrPurple Jan 2018 #23
would love to see this happen, would also love to see a rider bill stating that AllaN01Bear Jan 2018 #26
Part of what's needed. lark Jan 2018 #36

niyad

(113,990 posts)
2. and, as someone else suggested here, all candidates should have to take the same
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 01:19 PM
Jan 2018

test that immigrants seeking citizenship must take.

FakeNoose

(32,917 posts)
27. Yes, the mental state is more important than physical
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 03:38 PM
Jan 2018

I agree, and it's a great name for the law too.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
4. The bill is very likely unconstitutional
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 01:23 PM
Jan 2018

Since the Constitution seems pretty clear on the qualifications needed to run for President

unblock

(52,510 posts)
7. the constitution does not prevent further qualifications.
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 01:37 PM
Jan 2018

in fact there are a few more requirements, such as filing fees and signatures.

getagrip_already

(14,991 posts)
8. not really, since it doesn't dq a candidate...
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 01:41 PM
Jan 2018

It only releases medical information. The act says nothing about passing or failing, just a requirement for testing and release.

Running for president is a voluntary act. Just because there are tests you have to undergo isn't a barrier to running, or holding the office if you are successful.

Dave Starsky

(5,914 posts)
28. That's right.
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 03:53 PM
Jan 2018

The person running could be a pants-shitting, drooling idiot, but they could still run, and even be elected. Nearly half of eligible voters would still vote for them. The swing states would still swing in their direction. And, should they actually win, 37% of people polled would still approve of the job they are doing a year later.

I see nothing wrong with this law. I think it is a great idea.

SergeStorms

(19,208 posts)
32. That's where the Electoral College....
Wed Jan 10, 2018, 04:36 AM
Jan 2018

is supposed to step in and protect the Office of President from madmen like Trump. They completely failed at their job in 2016, that's for sure!

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
9. The proposed bill doesn't say that a negative result would be disqualifying.
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 01:41 PM
Jan 2018

It would be similar to efforts to require that candidates release their tax returns.

Boyle is probably being more tongue-in-cheek than not, considering what The Stable Genius Act stands for:
It's an acronym for "Standardizing Testing and Accountability Before Large Elections Giving Electors Necessary Information for Unobstructed Selection Act."

Irish_Dem

(48,126 posts)
6. Bus drivers and airline pilots undergo more testing than our political leaders.
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 01:31 PM
Jan 2018

And political leaders have responsibility for many more lives.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
10. Great. You know, I distinctly remember something that his hippy doctor said that
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 01:58 PM
Jan 2018

no one picked up on. He kept saying trump was PHYSICALLY ok. (innuendo: not vouching for the mental part)

Shrike47

(6,913 posts)
19. Im sure Trump dictated, if not personally wrote, that purported evaluation.
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 03:06 PM
Jan 2018

The language is distinctive. It didn’t occur to Trump his mental fitness would be challenged or he would have thrown in stuff about what a stable genius he is.

njcpa1978

(114 posts)
12. Great acronym
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 02:12 PM
Jan 2018

If the Feds can't pass it, some states could require it for the person to be included on the ballot. Too bad it is a little too late.

calimary

(81,610 posts)
24. Welcome to DU, njcpa1978!
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 03:29 PM
Jan 2018

Some people are just freakin' clever. THIS, too, was a genius act, and stable, too! Even while this measure faces certain CON de-stabilization efforts.

ALL THE MORE REASON to flip the House. We need to go all out to take back the House of Reps. Both houses of Congress would be preferable, but let's AT LEAST take back the House. AND, even though it means more work and more struggle, as many statehouses as we can swing. We need more Democratic governors on duty, and on guard. The bad guys are only a few seats shy of being able to call as Constitutional Convention, and rewrite that founding document to further their own ends, at the expense of all the rest of us.

erronis

(15,478 posts)
31. And if we can actually control the House, will we fix the gerrymandering?
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 06:56 PM
Jan 2018

I certainly hope we can. There are lots of good suggestions on how to do that (many with complicated mathematical/topological convolutions) but anything is better than what the 'uglicans have rigged.

My fear is that once the power has shifted to the left of the aisle then the power holders will not feel as strongly about changing the misrepresentation.

calimary

(81,610 posts)
33. For that I think the main remedy is to take back as many governorships as possible.
Wed Jan 10, 2018, 05:10 AM
Jan 2018

AND secretaries of state (at the state level, of course). The census is coming up in 2020, and its results determine how congressional districts are reapportioned. We DESPERATELY need Democrats as governors, so the DEMS are in charge when that reapportionment happens. In as many states as possible, and as many state representative seats as possible.

If we controlled Congress again, our side could bring up and push bills to fix things like this at the federal level, but we'd have to have enough Democrats to be able to override a trump veto. Cuz he'd veto it for sure.

bucolic_frolic

(43,540 posts)
13. I still think "Stable" a subliminal euphemism for stiff
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 02:26 PM
Jan 2018

as in stiff p**** who grabs 'em by the p**** or stiff those contractors

Obviously circulation is impaired, look at the mental functioning, and that reverberates to speech problems, and of course ED, and hence the claims of omnipotence and brillance

This is akin to Ferdinand Marcos infamous video appearing as a robust boxer to declare his health and fitness for office, even though he couldn't have punched out a stuffed Easter Bunny

bigbrother05

(5,995 posts)
15. If there is a gaggle of geese, maybe genius could also be a collective noun
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 02:41 PM
Jan 2018

There is a murder of crows and since horses live in a stable, maybe there should be a genius of horses' asses?

As in "The WH is occupied by a genius of horses' asses."

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
14. That title is a mouthful, can we just call it Donald's Law?
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 02:30 PM
Jan 2018

In honor of one Donald Trump, who suffered the tragic consequences of being totally unfit for office.

0rganism

(23,995 posts)
16. how about a rider that requires disclosure of 5+ years of tax returns?
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 02:49 PM
Jan 2018

i know, i know, pie in the sky, unicorns and flying castles and sparkle ponies

DeminPennswoods

(15,307 posts)
18. Brendan Boyle isn't the representative I'd have thought
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 02:52 PM
Jan 2018

who'd intrpduce such a bill. Boyle's a pretty centrist Dem, but maybe his NE Philly-based district is getting more liberal.

calimary

(81,610 posts)
25. Well, shit, look what Dianne Feinstein did today!
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 03:31 PM
Jan 2018

SOMETIMES they're capable of greatness. They don't always just fall back on the spineless cowardly lazy-ass "well, okay..." approach.

AllaN01Bear

(18,866 posts)
26. would love to see this happen, would also love to see a rider bill stating that
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 03:33 PM
Jan 2018

all congress critters and the vp the prez be on social security only.

lark

(23,203 posts)
36. Part of what's needed.
Wed Jan 10, 2018, 11:53 AM
Jan 2018

We need a full medical and psychiatric review for all candidates, even incumbents..
We need taxes for past 10 years released.
No person can run for any federal office without doing both of these in full.

That would keep the truly demented asshats out of office and lessen the danger to our country.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Democratic congressman in...