Trump refuses to commit to Mueller interview
Source: The Hill
BY JORDAN FABIAN AND BEN KAMISAR - 01/10/18 03:37 PM EST
President Trump said Wednesday it is unlikely he will have to sit down with special counsel Robert Mueller for an interview, arguing that there was "no collusion" between his campaign and Russia.
Trump repeatedly dodged whether he would submit to an interview with Mueller by citing his claim there was no collusion during the 2016 presidential election.
Well see what happens, the president said when pressed by a reporter on Wednesday. When they have no collusion
it seems unlikely that youd even have an interview.
Trump was speaking during a joint press conference alongside Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg following a meeting at the White House.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/368365-trump-refuses-to-commit-to-mueller-interview
onecaliberal
(32,996 posts)janterry
(4,429 posts)I wish we had the Senate. All during those Bush Jr. years, at least we had that
onecaliberal
(32,996 posts)yesterday.
getagrip_already
(14,970 posts)In the end, muehler can send him a subpoena. But in reality, he wants it to be voluntary under conditions that work for the prosecutors.
If trump digs in his heels, it will probably go to the scotus eventually. But he can also just plead the fifth right in the white house.
It's a dance of the clowns against the professionals.
davekriss
(4,644 posts)Are police officers going to march into the Oval Office and carry him out in handcuffs? Not likely. The only remedy would be to impeach then prosecute. But its even less likely that the Republican House will vote to impeach and a Republican Senate convict. Were stuck with this bombastic loon for the forseable future.
(Id love to be talked down from the ledge on this one, but the times seem so bleak.)
On edit: I reread your post and see you already addressed the what if. Im still not encouraged, though.
C Moon
(12,226 posts)getagrip_already
(14,970 posts)If he refuses, the ball is in muehlers court.
Bob can ignore it and move forward, indicting or leaving him an unindicted co-conspirator. Ih he indicts trump, it could end up at the scotus.
Or, he can subpoena trump. Then it will go to a federal court. Eventually it could end up at the scotus.
The 2018 scotus is much different than the 1972 scotus (gawd I feel old having spanned both). Today's court has a majority of originalists. Only roberts is a question. It is likely they won't allow either an indictment or a subpoena. But that's just a guess.
This has to end politically. It won't end via the judiciary. Not in 2018.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Does Mueller have the authority to compel Trump (with a subpoena) to testify under oath?
Would Trump's refusal to appear be grounds for impeachment?
kysrsoze
(6,025 posts)if Comrade Assface refuses to testify.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Oops.
BigmanPigman
(51,658 posts)davekriss
(4,644 posts)Thats why he was placed on the court.
Javaman
(62,534 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,987 posts)By Josh Dawsey January 10 at 3:47 PM
President Trump on Wednesday declined to say whether he would grant an interview to special counsel Robert S. Mueller III and his team, deflecting repeated questions on the topic by saying there had been no collusion with the Russians during the 2016 presidential campaign. Well see what happens, Trump said when asked directly whether he would sit for an interview with the special counsel.
Trump then questioned why he would be interviewed, arguing again there had been no collusion between his campaign and Russia.
It seems unlikely youd even have an interview, Trump said during a news conference at the White House with Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg.
Muellers team told Trumps lawyers in December they are likely to request an interview with the president, The Washington Post has reported, as part of their investigation into Moscows meddling in the election and whether any Trump associates conspired with Russian agents.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-declines-to-say-whether-he-would-sit-for-interview-with-muellers-team/2018/01/10/823893fa-f645-11e7-91af-31ac729add94_story.html
When the subpoena comes in, his ass is going to do something - whether it is a deposition or testimony in front of a Grand Jury or whatever he is told he better do.
Blue_Adept
(6,402 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,987 posts)Don't be surprised is sneaky stuff happens during that event (although at least he couldn't start a hot war with NK while the games are going on in SK).
Blue_Adept
(6,402 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,987 posts)if we start bombing all the athletes!
Botany
(70,643 posts).... and company. Trump's lawyers have to be shittin' kittens over Trump's mouth.
BTW the word is SUBPOENA.
pangaia
(24,324 posts):spray
Irish_Dem
(47,928 posts)He is capable of refusing to do the interview.
And I doubt any one would physically force him to comply.
janterry
(4,429 posts)He has no reason to expect - as President - he can be held accountable.
If Mueller has enough evidence, if it's really damning - maybe.............
Irish_Dem
(47,928 posts)Anon-C
(3,430 posts)[link:https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/reports/2017/12/07/443833/donald-trump-criminal-conspiracy-law/|
Trump and RICO
For months, the suggestion that President Trumps campaign and/or The Trump Organization would be pursued under RICO was largely treated as the fevered imaginings of fabulists hell-bent on removing Trump from office. However, the interlocking web of alleged criminality that Mueller is investigating bears a strong resemblance to exactly the kind of organized criminal activity that the RICO statute was designed to combat.
Irish_Dem
(47,928 posts)One of the crimes, selling out the US to a hostile foreign power.
Welcome to DU!
Duppers
(28,133 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 10, 2018, 11:29 PM - Edit history (1)
The U.S. Marshals are the ones who'd serve the warrant(s).
This may come down to an Andrew Jackson moment when he said, "John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it."
Irish_Dem
(47,928 posts)Kimchijeon
(1,606 posts)red dog 1
(27,918 posts)I just hope he won't be POTUS much longer.
(I also hope Pence, Eddie Munster & The Turtle will be removed from office as well)
"We must accept finite disappointment, but never lose infinite hope."
Dr.Martin Luther King, Jr.
paleotn
(18,014 posts)Visit the Mueller team....under oath.....or take the 5th.
The rat is backed into a corner. Bill Clinton decided not to force constitutional crises and testified before the grand jury in 1998, so there is precedent.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Either way he's fucked.
jayschool2013
(2,318 posts)He'll not only answer, but he'll incriminate himself.
djacq
(1,634 posts)LOCK HIM UP!
ffr
(22,681 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)"I don't recall"
"I don't recall"
"I don't recall"
Mr. Ected
(9,675 posts)And he certainly won't be the last.
But he'll be the best. The very, very best.
red dog 1
(27,918 posts)Last edited Fri Jan 12, 2018, 02:35 PM - Edit history (1)
(NBC News 2 days ago)
"probably"?