Sara Netanyahu Charged With Fraud for Ordering $100k Worth of Meals From Gourmet Chefs
Source: Haaretz
Sara Netanyahu, the wife of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was indicted on Thursday for alleged "systematic fraud" involving hundreds of thousands of shekels in connection with meal expenses incurred at the Prime Minister's Residence.
Sara Netanyahu was charged along with Ezra Saidoff, a former deputy director general of the Prime Minister's Office. The two are charged in an indictment filed at the Jerusalem Magistrate's Court with aggravated fraudulent receiving of an item or items, fraud and breach of trust. Saidoff was also charged with falsification by a public servant.
According to the indictment, Sara Netanyahu instructed staff at the Prime Minister's Residence in Jerusalem to order meals consumed at the residence worth a total of 350,000 shekels ($96,000) from gourmet restaurants between 2010 and 2013 in violation of rules barring the residence from ordering meals from the outside during periods when the residence had a cook on its staff.
Investigators in the case gathered evidence that purportedly shows that the prime minister's wife ordered that the employment of cook at the residence be concealed and that she was aware that ordering meals from the outside for the residence when it employed a cook was a violation of the rules.
Read more: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/sara-netanyahu-charged-with-fraud-over-misuse-of-funds-1.6197828
BeyondGeography
(39,398 posts)A girls gotta eat, right?
olegramps
(8,200 posts)Israel lost its way when they elect the likes of Netanyahu. He not only a crook, but a murderous bastard.
whathehell
(29,113 posts)No offense, but I'm starting to wonder about the Israeli electorate.
We have crooks, but we generally don't RE-elect them.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,421 posts)Michael Grimm leads the Republican race for NY District 11, a strong Republican seat: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_New_York,_2018#District_11
Re-election seems pretty common, to me.
whathehell
(29,113 posts)As for Grimm, he's RUNNING, not "elected" as of yet. Sorry.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,421 posts)What's more, at the moment, it's his wife who's been charged.
Issa is widely believed to have been a crook, and was elected and re-elected after that: https://www.npr.org/2012/04/16/150739985/house-investigator-issa-has-faced-allegations-as-well?t=1529584920491
Rick Scott oversaw the largest Medicare fraud in US history, and then got elected and re-elected: http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2014/mar/03/florida-democratic-party/rick-scott-rick-scott-oversaw-largest-medicare-fra/
Grimm is running and leading, yes - the US electorate is still willing to re-elect crooks. So, you're stuck with "Nixon hadn't been convicted when he was re-elected". Just when a large part of the world correctly saw him as dishonest ...
"Sorry".
George II
(67,782 posts)...if any formal charges have been filed yet.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/02/benjamin-netanyahu-charged-180215104012576.html
(note: al jazeera is NOT a right wing news source, this has also been reported in the NY Times as well but it's behind a pay wall)
Unfortunately Grimm is running in the most conservative area of NY City, most likely he'll be elected. I suspect he's technically not running for "re-election" since he isn't currently occupying the seat.
whathehell
(29,113 posts)whathehell
(29,113 posts)as the examples you've given here.
In any case, I'd say YOU are "stuck with Nixon" since, as President, he is the ONLY equivalent to an Israeli Prime Minister you can cite here -- Sorry, again.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,421 posts)Now you're admitting that they are; you're just saying convicts aren't re-elected as US president. Why you say "I think not" when Netanyahu does not yet have any convictions, I don't know. Maybe you're just taking a wild guess that he has been convicted, and you can't be bothered to check.
Congratulations. You must be so proud.
whathehell
(29,113 posts)So much for 'expectations' and 'wild guesses', I guess.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/michael-grimm-loses-republican-primary-house_us_5b3296bee4b0b745f17883bc
still_one
(92,539 posts)prevalent among republicans, it has occurred on both sides of the aisle
whathehell
(29,113 posts)and so far, neither you nor he has done so.
still_one
(92,539 posts)known racist, sexist, bigot, with beaucoup conflicts of interest, that were well known before he was elected, I don't think the U.S. electorate is a shinning example
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=2090268
Response to still_one (Reply #16)
Name removed Message auto-removed
still_one
(92,539 posts)whathehell
(29,113 posts)What is it that's "not accurate"?
still_one
(92,539 posts)Edwin Edwards, Carroll Hubbard, James Traficant, Duke Cunningham...
..
This article analyzes the point you just made:
http://www.open.edu/openlearn/society-politics-law/politics/why-do-voters-allow-corrupt-politicians-stay-office
and it isn't unique to any one country
http://carnegieendowment.org/2016/12/13/why-do-voters-back-corrupt-and-dishonest-politicians-pub-66432
whathehell
(29,113 posts)Like Bibi..
still_one
(92,539 posts)term that he was involved in illegal activities.
Also, Nixon wasn't the only example I gave.
It is obvious that in your view that Israel is the only country whose electorate who re-elects corrupt politicians, because obviously, the U.S electorate would never stoop to something so low.
Hell, Reagan would have been elected to a third term if it was legal, even after Iran Contra.
whathehell
(29,113 posts)Sorry, one, but you'll have to do better than that here..Try something called "documentation".
No "criminal acts" were known before Watergate, and the only thing that seems "obvious" here is your determination to not let facts get in the way of a good "America bad" pout.
Have a nice one.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)MrModerate
(9,753 posts)And I, for one, will do a little dance when they drag you out of the residence in handcuffs.
lark
(23,203 posts)This is why little murderer and drumpf get along so well, both are total grifters and profiteers, besides being murderous.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)$30,000 a year vs imagine how much a good chef salary and the raw foods would cost per year.
riversedge
(70,475 posts)DoctorJoJo
(1,134 posts).... father, wife, and son. And of course they are tight with Trump and Repukes in Congress, who define corruption.
Response to DoctorJoJo (Reply #23)
Name removed Message auto-removed
ck4829
(35,097 posts)dubyadiprecession
(5,739 posts)From the US, you could say her meals were on the American taxpayer.
Response to dubyadiprecession (Reply #26)
Name removed Message auto-removed