Legislature passes sweeping electoral reforms (NY)
Source: Albany Times-Union
ALBANY The state Legislature on Monday passed a slate of electoral reform bills that would update New York's arcane voting laws and increase access to the polls on Election Day.
The ambitious legislation, which included two bills requiring a constitutional amendment, moved hastily through committees and passed overwhelmingly in both houses on Monday afternoon.
Activists, noting New York's abysmal voter turnout compared to other states, have long pushed for these reforms, including closing a loophole that allows unfettered donations from limited liability companies, no-excuse absentee voting, early voting, same-day voter registration, and state and federal primary consolidation.
Most of the measures had passed the overwhelmingly Democratic Assembly numerous times, but were impeded by Senate Republicans, who feared that such reforms would jeopardize the conference's slim majority in the chamber.
Read more: https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/NY-Legislature-passes-sweeping-electoral-reforms-13532415.php
Electoral reforms
Wounded Bear
(58,795 posts)if only our friends in red states could do the same.
summer_in_TX
(2,772 posts)Not same-day registration. Early voting has been a strength. And unfortunately we have a poll tax
oops, I mean voter ID.
AllyCat
(16,269 posts)after 2020 election when we hope most of these horrible republicans will face a sound election, not the gerrymandered crap we have now. Good on NY!
Fiendish Thingy
(15,716 posts)Currently, if someone is pardoned for a federal crime, NY state law says they cant be prosecuted for that same charge from the state.
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)Igel
(35,390 posts)double jeopardy?
Most pardons are for those convicted.
(It's one of the things I don't much like about the "separate sovereign" doctrine. How many times can be you be tried for the same thing? As many times as there are levels of governments. It's a casuistic way to get around an impediment to retrying the same accused for the same act when one instance fails to achieve the desired outcome. That it is casuistry is seen in how the doctrine is applied: If you nail the person at one level, there's no desire to retry him at another. It's only used when the person "escapes" justice by being found innocent by the process that defines justice. It's part of the redefining of "justice" to mean different things in one discourse.)
Danascot
(4,699 posts)"Most of the measures had passed the overwhelmingly Democratic Assembly numerous times, but were impeded by Senate Republicans, who feared that such reforms would jeopardize the conference's slim majority in the chamber. "