Nancy Pelosi refused to allow White House officials access to the House floor for a State of the Uni
Source: business Insider
Nancy Pelosi refused to allow White House officials access to the House floor for a State of the Union walkthrough
Joe Perticone
1h
Shutdown Watch banner
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi last week instructed the House's sergeant-at-arms to cancel a walkthrough for White House officials preparing for the State of the Union address.
President Donald Trump wants to go forward with the State of the Union on January 29 but would need Pelosi's permission to use the House chamber.
Pelosi has already called for postponing the address until the partial government shutdown is over or having Trump instead submit it in writing.
WASHINGTON President Donald Trump is still trying to deliver his annual State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress on January 29, despite barriers put in place by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who now controls the House chamber.
Under Pelosi's directive, a scheduled walkthrough last week for White House officials in preparation for the State of the Union was canceled. .........................................
Read more: https://www.businessinsider.com/government-shutdown-nancy-pelosi-refuses-white-house-access-for-state-of-the-union-walkthrough-2019-1
I would to see trumps face when he heard about this!!
Also see:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211711450
Phoenix61
(17,026 posts)pandr32
(11,640 posts)onit2day
(1,201 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)effing pathetic that THIS is the only thing that he actually cares about in the situation
Gothmog
(145,894 posts)There can be no SOTU without a formal resolution. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/22/white-house-planning-state-of-the-union-1119849
For now, Congress has not approved a joint resolution authorizing an appearance by the president next Tuesday, so there is nothing scheduled for Pelosi to cancel. The resolution would need the support of House Democrats, who have followed taken their lead from Pelosi's lead during the shutdown.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Everything the Rump does is "political". We are talking about the legislative and executive branches of government. When would something they do not be "political"? Let them fuss and fume all they want. This is on the Rump 100%.
Ohiogal
(32,185 posts)No one yet has stood up to Bratty Donnie like Madame Speaker has! I guess it took a woman to put him in his place!
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,125 posts)SCVDem
(5,103 posts)a coin lock on the Speakers restroom.
I don't doubt he would do it.
California_Republic
(1,826 posts)paleotn
(18,014 posts)Donnie doesn't like small things. He has to compensate, you know.
California_Republic
(1,826 posts)Not that I want it... just preparing for more crazy
dalton99a
(81,707 posts)defacto7
(13,485 posts)California_Republic
(1,826 posts)bottomofthehill
(8,364 posts)It would not be considered a Joint Session of Congress.
onetexan
(13,080 posts)this way he'll only have his nest of vipers to adulate to him, and the rest of the country and the world can laugh at how crazy they are.
bottomofthehill
(8,364 posts)House and Senate
brush
(53,977 posts)Scotus justices, joint chiefs, cabinet members etc.
It's held in the House chamber because it's much bigger than the Senate chamber.
bottomofthehill
(8,364 posts)is that, a session of Congress with both the House and Senate. No others need be invited or in attendance.
brush
(53,977 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 23, 2019, 08:36 PM - Edit history (1)
The House's chamber is big enough to accommodate the five hundred-plus people of a joint session. The Senate's is not.
bottomofthehill
(8,364 posts)I went to the Joint Session held in Constitution Hall in Philadelphia for the Bi-Centennial of the Congress. There is no stipulation on the size or location of the room other than what the Resolution calls for
brush
(53,977 posts)PeeJ52
(1,588 posts)Just to show her he can come in any time he wants...
Talitha
(6,639 posts)That way, if Delusional Donnie decides to crash the gates he'd just be talking to the room.
DeminPennswoods
(15,295 posts)I've seen CSPAN coverage where the hosts have said the cameras were turned off. I believe the CSPAN cameras are the only TV cameras allowed in the House and the Senate.
bottomofthehill
(8,364 posts)But he has to be recognized to speak by the Speaker or the Democrat she puts in the Chair, and that wont happen. Any Democratic Member of the House Simpally moves to Adjurn, which is a Privilidged Motion, they vote, the majority ( Dems) win the vote, shut off the cameras, turn off the lights, lock the Doors, go home and get a good nights sleep
defacto7
(13,485 posts)through some sort of extra-presidential maneuver he would be crossing the line between president and dictator. Keep watching.
PeeJ52
(1,588 posts)This is his world, we're just visiting.
bottomofthehill
(8,364 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 23, 2019, 12:18 AM - Edit history (1)
Don't cc over 100 people, including the Speakers staff if you don't want your news on the street, or maybe that's just what they wanted.......
onit2day
(1,201 posts)cstanleytech
(26,357 posts)which is Pelosi cannot be overridden by the one for the Senate.
Really the only way to resolve this is to open the government back up but Mitch (The Coward) McConnell refuses to let a vote to do that come to the Senate floor for a vote.
bottomofthehill
(8,364 posts)It will not be a Joint Session of Congress, but the House and Senate Sergeant at Arms are independent of each other. They are elected officers of the House and Senate. They do not override each other but each independently control their sides, House/Senate and need to work together with the Architect of the Capitol. The three of them make up the USCP Police Board.
brush
(53,977 posts)whether the Speaker had invited him or not.
Looks like he got powned.
still_one
(92,510 posts)We have been compromised by a foreign power, and the Democrats have to take a stand. The Democrats, and perhaps the courts are the only thing standing for our republic
70% of the republicans in Congress are trying to sell the country down the tubes
bottomofthehill
(8,364 posts)still_one
(92,510 posts)an executive order by taking money already allocated for other uses?
bottomofthehill
(8,364 posts)Appropriations bills would have to change to ensure he was not spending money with out the approval of the branch that is responsible for appropriating the funds
still_one
(92,510 posts)Scruffy1
(3,257 posts)All the Constitution says he shall report to Congress from time to time. I wouldn't allow him in, ever, if it was up to me.
druidity33
(6,452 posts)Cold War Spook
(1,279 posts)He could sit up there and mumble his speech.