Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UpInArms

(51,295 posts)
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 03:20 PM Jan 2019

U.S. on track to add $12 trillion to national debt by 2029 unless Washington changes course

Source: Marketwatch

Washington has been drowning in red ink for years and it’s only going to get a lot worse over the next decade, a fresh government estimate shows.

The U.S. is likely to add $12 trillion in public debt from 2020 to 2029 through a combination of higher government spending and slower economic growth, according to the Congressional Budget Office. That’s on top of the $16.6 trillion the government is expected to owe to the public at the end of 2019.



Unless the red fiscal tide is reversed, the percentage of the U.S. public debt relative to the size of the economy would climb to 93% by 2029 from 78% right now.

That’s a bit lower than the CBO’s prior forecast, but it would still be historic in a time of peace. The last time the U.S. debt was that big was shortly after the end of World War Two, a period when the government spent enormous sums to defeat the Nazi menace and Japanese militarism.

Expressed another way, the public debt would average 4.4% of gross domestic product from 2020 to 2029.

Read more: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-on-track-to-add-12-trillion-to-national-debt-by-2029-unless-washington-changes-course-2019-01-28?mod=bnbh



Trickle down supply side borrow and spend RussPublicans have destroyed the economic stability of our country ...
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. on track to add $12 trillion to national debt by 2029 unless Washington changes course (Original Post) UpInArms Jan 2019 OP
President Warren has a plan for that BeyondGeography Jan 2019 #1
My all time favorite song..................from one the greatest bands.....Tax the Rich......... turbinetree Jan 2019 #2
+1. Thanks for that memory. And Alvin Lee, RIP yonder Jan 2019 #11
YES.... one of the greatest songs ever. groundloop Jan 2019 #16
Ooh, I can't wait until those juicy tax cuts trickle down to the rest of us IronLionZion Jan 2019 #3
I can remember when President Clinton DirtEdonE Jan 2019 #4
A good chart says it all. sandensea Jan 2019 #5
A good chart (for a little while anyway) DirtEdonE Jan 2019 #8
Like most of them, that one too excludes Bush war spending - which was adding around $170 bn a year sandensea Jan 2019 #9
Wow DirtEdonE Jan 2019 #12
The GOPee is good at appealing to all the base pettiness out there sandensea Jan 2019 #21
Yeah, that's only the cost of the wars TexasBushwhacker Jan 2019 #25
Republicans really know how to make wars live up to their reputation sandensea Jan 2019 #26
Only thing to do is cut more taxes for the wealthy... PeeJ52 Jan 2019 #6
KGOP republicans are pissing all over America Achilleaze Jan 2019 #7
Lot of big deficits in the Reagan years. I thought he was the Small Govt. Great Fiscal Conservative progree Jan 2019 #10
"Small government" means small (and weak) enough that the rich guys can do whatever they want FiveGoodMen Jan 2019 #18
Now that they aren't using House of Roberts Jan 2019 #13
File this under "no shit". It goes up because no one wants to do what it takes to fix it. oldsoftie Jan 2019 #14
"Taxing the rich" wont fix the problem. There aren't enough "rich" to tax. FiveGoodMen Jan 2019 #19
Assets and income are two totally different things. We tax income. And we miss a LOT of it. oldsoftie Jan 2019 #22
That leaves a huge chunk of the world's wealth with a few handfuls of individuals ... forever FiveGoodMen Jan 2019 #23
The problem is that we don't tax the way other successful countries do. oldsoftie Jan 2019 #24
Funny how there were enough rich to drive up the debt with their tax cuts. SammyWinstonJack Jan 2019 #29
That still doesn't work. Their tax receipts are still up oldsoftie Jan 2019 #30
Their plan is working.... next step is to slash infrastructure and social programs groundloop Jan 2019 #15
How can they slash what has been being spent on infrastructure? Cold War Spook Jan 2019 #20
During previous campaigns Republicans bragged that if elected they would balance the budget. honest.abe Jan 2019 #17
Deficits don't matter Wolf Frankula Jan 2019 #27
Nothing is being done to stop this insane method for running an economy. democratisphere Jan 2019 #28
Gee, I know... let's get a mega-loan from Putin!!! Talitha Jan 2019 #31

groundloop

(11,537 posts)
16. YES.... one of the greatest songs ever.
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 05:04 PM
Jan 2019

Definitely one of my favorites.

BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO
SO I'LL LEAVE IT UP TO YOU.
 

DirtEdonE

(1,220 posts)
4. I can remember when President Clinton
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 03:29 PM
Jan 2019

had balanced budgets and was on track to pay off the national debt in little more than a decade.

That was then. This is now. When the pubicans are in power, suddenly deficit spending doesn't matter.

sandensea

(21,720 posts)
5. A good chart says it all.
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 03:30 PM
Jan 2019

I'd add only that the Bush-era deficit figures (those for FY 2004-08) exclude the $170 billion a year the imp was spending, on average, on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. That works out to an average of around 1.3% of GDP extra at the time.

On Rove's advice, Dubya kept those outlays off the books - and they've stayed there ever since.

sandensea

(21,720 posts)
9. Like most of them, that one too excludes Bush war spending - which was adding around $170 bn a year
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 03:43 PM
Jan 2019

Here's one showing the war-related appropriations for each fiscal year - which, until '09, were kept off the books by the Midland Idiot.

 

DirtEdonE

(1,220 posts)
12. Wow
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 04:12 PM
Jan 2019

Just wow.
How have we survived pubican "presidents" all these years?
Democrats come in and clean up their disasters then are criticized by pubicans for not cleaning up their disasters fast enough!

sandensea

(21,720 posts)
21. The GOPee is good at appealing to all the base pettiness out there
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 06:06 PM
Jan 2019

"Vote for us," the thinly-veiled refrain goes, "not for those brown-skin loving, tofu eating, hybrid driving, fornicating, baby killing Democrats."

"And we'll do all the brown person bombing, baby killing, and fornicatin' instead."

TexasBushwhacker

(20,256 posts)
25. Yeah, that's only the cost of the wars
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 08:15 PM
Jan 2019

Not the total cost of the DOD. According to the CBO the total cost of the military for FY2017 was $590 BILLION. For FY2019, Trump wants to raise it to $681 BILLION but at the same time withdraw half our troops in Afghanistan (about 7K) and virtually all from Syria. So he wants to spend almost $700 Billion for what's pretty close to a peacetime military. That's twice as much as China and Russia COMBINED. No wonder we can't have nice things.

sandensea

(21,720 posts)
26. Republicans really know how to make wars live up to their reputation
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 08:19 PM
Jan 2019

That they're rackets.

And best of all, they got away with all that with absolute impunity.

Nice work if you can get it.

progree

(10,950 posts)
10. Lot of big deficits in the Reagan years. I thought he was the Small Govt. Great Fiscal Conservative
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 03:46 PM
Jan 2019

hero type.

oldsoftie

(12,674 posts)
14. File this under "no shit". It goes up because no one wants to do what it takes to fix it.
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 05:02 PM
Jan 2019

"Taxing the rich" wont fix the problem. There aren't enough "rich" to tax.
And nobody wants anything they like cut, yet they also don't want to be the ones to pay for it.
We need a consumption tax. It would Catch the billions, if not trillions, of untaxed money out there. Not just "underground" money, but money not claimed on 1099 or W2 info.
THATS where the real money is.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
19. "Taxing the rich" wont fix the problem. There aren't enough "rich" to tax.
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 05:59 PM
Jan 2019

Really? How many do we need?

I've read several times now that the top 26 individuals have as much money as the poorest 3.5 billion people.

Seems like they've got plenty of money that we could all use.

oldsoftie

(12,674 posts)
22. Assets and income are two totally different things. We tax income. And we miss a LOT of it.
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 06:36 PM
Jan 2019

And if you suggest that we start taxing assets, that will be a mess. Of the few countries that HAVE had an asset tax; Austria, Denmark, Germany, Sweden, Spain, Finland, Iceland, and Luxembourg all recently dropped it.

Yes, there arent enough rich to tax enough to make a dent in the debt. Just look up the numbers of rich and super rich.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
23. That leaves a huge chunk of the world's wealth with a few handfuls of individuals ... forever
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 07:26 PM
Jan 2019

And we make plans for how to get by on what's left?

I don't like that idea.

oldsoftie

(12,674 posts)
24. The problem is that we don't tax the way other successful countries do.
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 07:31 PM
Jan 2019

In the Nordic & Eu countries where they do provide more EVERYONE pays into the system. Here, thats not the case. Millions pay nothing into the IRS.
A consumption tax taxes ALL income. Especially the huge money that some of the wealthy are able to hide.
But we just wont do that here. But I guess the shit wont really hit the fan till I'm gone.

oldsoftie

(12,674 posts)
30. That still doesn't work. Their tax receipts are still up
Tue Jan 29, 2019, 09:11 AM
Jan 2019

Even after the cuts, federal tax revenue rose to an all time high. And the dollars from the upper segment has increased by even more. The % of income tax paid by the top 1% increased after the cuts.
I'm NOT defending the cuts, think their rates should have stayed right where they were. I also think high frequency trading should be taxed. (thats a whole different issue, but a HUGE one I think) I'm just pointing out that the debt isnt going to be impacted much by taxing them more, even at 70%, because there simply arent that many of them. We don't tax a ton of revenue. "Stated income" is the hidden revenue stream
The new tax law also took many more OFF the tax rolls as well

If we like the social services that some of the EU countries provide, then we also should take a hard look at how they PAY for them. EVERYONE pays. We don't do that here.

 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
20. How can they slash what has been being spent on infrastructure?
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 06:04 PM
Jan 2019

I didn't know the feds have been spending anything on infrastructure.

honest.abe

(8,690 posts)
17. During previous campaigns Republicans bragged that if elected they would balance the budget.
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 05:10 PM
Jan 2019

So they have had full control of the government for 2 years and the budget deficit is worse than ever.

Will voters ever realize these scoundrels are liars?

Wolf Frankula

(3,605 posts)
27. Deficits don't matter
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 08:23 PM
Jan 2019

At least Republican deficits don't. Skeletor and the Paranoid Randroid said that.

Wolf

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)
28. Nothing is being done to stop this insane method for running an economy.
Mon Jan 28, 2019, 09:01 PM
Jan 2019

This BS started with Reagan and has been compounded by irresponsible redumbliCONS ever since. This country is going down the tubes unless we change our ways immediately.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. on track to add $12 ...