Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 10:16 AM Feb 2019

Dems prepare to force Trump to reveal private talks with Putin

Source: Politico



Key chairmen met with the House general counsel in a bid to put any subpoena fight on firm legal ground.

By ANDREW DESIDERIO 02/16/2019 06:51 AM EST

House Democrats are taking their first real steps to force President Donald Trump to divulge information about his private conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin, setting up an extraordinary clash with the White House over Congress’ oversight authority.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the Intelligence Committee chairman, and Rep. Eliot Engel, the Foreign Affairs Committee chairman, told POLITICO they are actively consulting with House General Counsel Douglas Letter about the best way to legally compel the Trump administration to turn over documents or other information related to the president’s one-on-one discussions with the Russian leader.

“I had a meeting with the general counsel to discuss this and determine the best way to find out what took place in those private meetings — whether it’s by seeking the interpreter’s testimony, the interpreter’s notes, or other means,” Schiff (D-Calif.) said in a brief interview.

It’s a development that indicates Schiff and Engel are close to taking action on the matter; key members of the majority party often consult with the chamber’s general counsel on issues that could end up playing out in court. Democrats want to ensure that they are on the strongest possible legal ground because they anticipate the Trump administration will mount spirited challenges.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/16/dems-trump-putin-private-talks-1173275

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dems prepare to force Trump to reveal private talks with Putin (Original Post) DonViejo Feb 2019 OP
Well if there was any indications on what a lot of sane people saw transpire on the Rose Garden turbinetree Feb 2019 #1
I was hoping for something like this Leith Feb 2019 #2
The only reason for interpreter's notes is to function as an aide de memoire. Igel Feb 2019 #17
I'll bet the interpreter was Melenia denbot Feb 2019 #3
Red Sparrow. DemocracyMouse Feb 2019 #10
Surely the Executive branch can not be allowed to execute foreign policy on their own... PeeJ52 Feb 2019 #4
agree, this was collusion in plain sight onetexan Feb 2019 #6
Aye, Congress has the right and obligation to provide oversight for dealings with other countries. cstanleytech Feb 2019 #8
Will the courts support Trump in the continued expansion of Presidential power? jalan48 Feb 2019 #5
I bet Fuzzpope Feb 2019 #7
I would be. Igel Feb 2019 #18
It's not outside the realm of possibilities Fuzzpope Feb 2019 #20
What if she is a True Believer? LiberalLovinLug Feb 2019 #22
Good point. Fuzzpope Feb 2019 #23
Call him before congress now! Let's hear what he has to say. We have a right to know! ffr Feb 2019 #9
There would have to be people who are working in the White House and the Justice Dept who know that politicaljunkie41910 Feb 2019 #27
My question kwolf68 Feb 2019 #11
Ask a Nazi. Cold War Spook Feb 2019 #12
I bet Putin has tapes of all their meetings. Cold War Spook Feb 2019 #13
That's also been my assumption as well. n/t MBS Feb 2019 #28
Jebus. I do think Mike Pence is getting ready to step into the fat man's shoes!!! marble falls Feb 2019 #14
He'll just lie anyway brandnewday2009 Feb 2019 #15
No notes on the real discussion; here's my take SayItLoud Feb 2019 #16
Unless... Fuzzpope Feb 2019 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author geralmar Feb 2019 #19
dt confiscated interpreter's notes. I don't babylonsister Feb 2019 #24
This is very good news. riversedge Feb 2019 #25
This will produce absolutely nothing. If Putin and trump were going to discuss something Hoyt Feb 2019 #26

turbinetree

(24,745 posts)
1. Well if there was any indications on what a lot of sane people saw transpire on the Rose Garden
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 10:44 AM
Feb 2019

yesterday.....................then interpreters notes and a live interpreter, will be needed for the bat shit insanity that the public saw in real time, and what and how dangerous this malignant narcissistic psychopath is.

Because if anything he proved that he is bat shit insane with his agenda of being an absolute clusterfuck malignant narcissistic psychopath and he more than likely sold out this country, because he doesn't give one iota about the Constitution.............its his way or the highway..................





November 3, 2020 cannot get here fast enough.....................

Leith

(7,817 posts)
2. I was hoping for something like this
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 11:07 AM
Feb 2019

If you were the interpreter, knowing what you know about DFT, the ongoing investigations, the daily scandals, and being there when the conversation was going on, would you keep your own copy of your notes in case your bosses in the White House decided that they wanted all materials in their own possession?

Being the president's interpreter requires a high security clearance and that person would know treason when he or she sees and hears it. It wouldn't be surprising if Mueller had the notes already.

Igel

(35,390 posts)
17. The only reason for interpreter's notes is to function as an aide de memoire.
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 03:26 PM
Feb 2019

For the immediate task.

That function also imposes limits on what you write.

Since the goal is to understand what's in the source language and write down what you'll need to remember in order to put it in the target language, you first understand and then write only what you don't think you'll be sure to remember. That might be isolated words, it might be symbols, it might be phrases or complete sentences. It will vary from minute to minute. Often you write down questions--the words or phrases that require a bit of work to recast in the target language. Sometimes you write down novel phrases in the source language. Notice--for Trump's interpreter, all of that is Putin-related. You might get what Putin said partially reflected, and from that will have to reconstruct what Putin must have said; and from that, what Trump must have previously said. Or maybe not. Depends how closely Putin tracked Trump's speech. With the caveat that Putin has a habit of telling people what they "really" meant, not what they actually said or what they think they meant. In other words, words get twisted. But people tend to trust Putin and Putin-connected sources rather implicitly when it suits them.

There are exceptions when your notes reflect your client's speech. If the client's using a word strangely or if it has a specific meaning or nuance, you jot it down. That keeps you from using it in the wrong place or helps you to ID its equivalent in what you think of as the source language. You might also jot down when the other guy's interpreter gets something wrong, so you can clarify that the other interpreter misunderstood or misrepresented.

Notes for an hour can be a sentence or two, or 5 pages or 10 pages. But the more you write that you don't need, the more distracted you are from understanding what's being said, and the worse you are at your function.

 

PeeJ52

(1,588 posts)
4. Surely the Executive branch can not be allowed to execute foreign policy on their own...
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 11:34 AM
Feb 2019

without consultation and completely unknown to anyone but them. How can that be legal? How can that be governance? That would be saying the President of the United States can be a government unto itself and is responsible to no one. Once elected, they can have private meetings with foreign powers and give away any military secrets or defense plans as they wish. Not even a tRump court and Bill Barr could agree with this.

onetexan

(13,081 posts)
6. agree, this was collusion in plain sight
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 11:44 AM
Feb 2019

several private meetings with Russians and Putin and no staff or reporters allowed. Clearly the audacious Idiot has nothing to hide

cstanleytech

(26,362 posts)
8. Aye, Congress has the right and obligation to provide oversight for dealings with other countries.
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 11:48 AM
Feb 2019

What our guys should consider is subpoenaing him to get him to testify under oath and if he lies then they can impeach him.

 

Fuzzpope

(602 posts)
7. I bet
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 11:46 AM
Feb 2019

That interpreter lady is scared half to death.

They need to get this done while she is still around to obtain testimony from.

Igel

(35,390 posts)
18. I would be.
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 03:33 PM
Feb 2019

It's the kind of thing that makes you radioactive.

If she doesn't say what the investigators want, destruction in order to get the right answers is certainly not off the table.

If you give the right answers, destruction in order to revenge breech of confidentiality is also not off the table. Two people know what's been said, and if you say "A" and the client says "B", you have to turn to Putin and his interpreter for validation.

If Putin backs Trump, it's part of the collusion. If he doesn't, Putin's absolutely trustworthy.

But if you divulge confidential information, you're no longer trustworthy. If you say you don't remember, you're a tool and incompetent.

Interpreters are background.

Remember Carter's Polish interpreter? Somebody off on the side heard his translation and put a spin on it. The spin went far and wide. A later review by experts concluded that he was right and the media were wrong. You had to be paying pretty close attention to details in really obscure news sources to learn that. Why? Because the NYT and WaPo and LAT weren't about to say, "Oh, yeah, we listened to somebody who was wrong and seriously destroyed this one guy's reputation because we were lazy." Plus ça change ... все одно и то же будет.

 

Fuzzpope

(602 posts)
20. It's not outside the realm of possibilities
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 03:44 PM
Feb 2019

That Putin confirms the interpreter, even if she lies about what was said in a damaging manner.

In equal amounts, Putin appears to enjoy facilitating Trump and twisting the knife in his back.

He must absolutely loath Trump for betrayal of his own people. I truly believe such things matter, even to Putin as he derives benefits from it.

Donald Trump, before this is over, is clearly destined to be the most widely hated human being to ever be born.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,180 posts)
22. What if she is a True Believer?
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 03:58 PM
Feb 2019

Because I can't see Donnie Doolittle taking with him anyone that did not swear a loyalty oath to him first.

ffr

(22,681 posts)
9. Call him before congress now! Let's hear what he has to say. We have a right to know!
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 12:00 PM
Feb 2019

The president serves the people, not his own interests. I think people have forgotten that.

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
27. There would have to be people who are working in the White House and the Justice Dept who know that
Sun Feb 17, 2019, 10:20 AM
Feb 2019

this president is a traitor to this nation. How they live with themselves day to day is beyond me. This is not worth keeping a job or a paycheck. We know that this is the best job Sarah Huckabee Sanders could ever get in her lifetime with her political science degree from Ouachita Baptist University in Arkansas and her only jobs being having worked knocking on doors for her father's campaigns. But even she has to have a brain and a conscience somewhere under all those layers of sarcasm. But the truth will eventually come to light and those people who knew, but remained silent, should be deemed traitors as well. This White House will go down in history as worse than the Watergate conspirators and all those who participated in the cover up, and their children will bear this scorn for life.

kwolf68

(7,365 posts)
11. My question
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 12:39 PM
Feb 2019

And maybe this is for some much more civic minded than I am, is why would Trump document nefarious dealings with Putin?
 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
12. Ask a Nazi.
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 12:46 PM
Feb 2019

They kept notes on the Holocaust. Thankfully they did so after the war many people were able to find out what happened to their families.

SayItLoud

(1,702 posts)
16. No notes on the real discussion; here's my take
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 03:00 PM
Feb 2019

Putin speaks and understands English. He was/is a master intel agent. Anything he wanted tRUMP to know about what he (Putin) wants, and to remind tRUMP of what he is holding over tRUMP would be out of the interpreter's hearing IMO. Anything that the interpreter has documented will be standard bla bla bla....UNLESS the interpreter noted that Putin and tRUMP had a conversation out of hearing range or they advised the interpreter to not document this part of the meeting. If that's the case it's he/she said he said. So I don't think we will see much from the notes of the interpreter. Just sayin... another take.

 

Fuzzpope

(602 posts)
21. Unless...
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 03:46 PM
Feb 2019

It suited a twisted agenda of Putin's for the interpreter specifically to hear something crazy.

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

babylonsister

(171,111 posts)
24. dt confiscated interpreter's notes. I don't
Sat Feb 16, 2019, 09:23 PM
Feb 2019

think he would have done that if Putin hired this person. I believe Putin had his own?

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/01/trump-putin-meeting-interpreter-notes
Trump Reportedly Confiscated Interpreter’s Notes to Keep Putin Meeting Details Secret

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
26. This will produce absolutely nothing. If Putin and trump were going to discuss something
Sun Feb 17, 2019, 12:53 AM
Feb 2019

damaging, they wouldn’t do it where the whole world knows they are meeting. We’d never know they met, or more likely talked by secure phone, with one well trusted interpreter. More likely, their henchmen would deliver messages.

It’ll be another publicized dead end, just like the blocked phone number after trump tower meeting.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Dems prepare to force Tru...