Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,768 posts)
Fri May 17, 2019, 10:42 AM May 2019

Trump's Termination of DACA Program Unlawful, 4th Cir. Rules (1)

Source: Bloomberg Law

Trump's Termination of DACA Program Unlawful, 4th Cir. Rules (1)
May. 17, 2019 9:41AM Updated: May. 17, 2019 9:59AM

Second appeals court to rule against Trump administration on DACA
DHS is allowed to change its policy on information sharing

The Trump administration's decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was illegal because it wasn't adequately explained, a split federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., ruled.

The May 17 decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit overturns a lower court's determination that the administration hadn't done anything wrong either in ending DACA or in the way it went about doing it. The Department of Homeland Security didn't adequately explain its rationale for ending the Obama-era program, the appeals court said in a 2-1 decision.

The Fourth Circuit joins the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco in finding that the decision to end DACA was unlawful. The current lack of a split among the federal appeals courts decreases the chance that the U.S. Supreme Court will take up the issue. In November, the administration appealed the Ninth Circuit decision to the Supreme Court, as well as two cases pending before the Second and District of Columbia circuits.

The justices haven't said one way or another what they will do with the cases.
....

The case is Casa de Maryland v. Dep't of Homeland Sec. , 4th Cir., No. 18-01521, 5/17/19 .

(Updated with additional reporting.)

To contact the reporter on this story: Laura D. Francis in Washington at lfrancis@bloomberglaw.com

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Jay-Anne B. Casuga at jcasuga@bloomberglaw.com; Terence Hyland at thyland@bloomberglaw.com



Read more: https://www.bloomberglaw.com/document/XCBC2D2O000000



Hat tip, Joe.My.God.:

Federal Appeals Court Rules Against Trump On DACA

https://www.joemygod.com/2019/05/federal-appeals-court-rules-against-trump-on-daca/
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's Termination of DACA Program Unlawful, 4th Cir. Rules (1) (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves May 2019 OP
Good. Add that to the long list of unlawful moves. machoneman May 2019 #1
Yes. Impeach. calimary May 2019 #2
"Unlikely to go to SCOTUS"... BigmanPigman May 2019 #3
K&R Scurrilous May 2019 #4
I think we might be missing something here melm00se May 2019 #5
The legal reasoning on this one stopwastingmymoney May 2019 #6

calimary

(81,611 posts)
2. Yes. Impeach.
Fri May 17, 2019, 12:01 PM
May 2019

For justice.

And for the history books.

AND for the “cautionary tale” effect. It’d be there to warn future scumbucket or cheater or otherwise illegitimate pResidents who might be tempted to flout the law or place themselves above it.

We CANNOT afford to let this bastard get away with it. We HAVE TO leave a mark. A mark on his name, a mark on his “brand”, a mark on his “legacy”, and a mark on his so-called “pResidency”.

melm00se

(4,998 posts)
5. I think we might be missing something here
Fri May 17, 2019, 03:19 PM
May 2019

Please correct me if I am wrong but as I understand it, DACA was done via Executive Order, not legislation. Does this mean that an Executive Order has the same force as legislation despite not being voted upon by the House and Senate?

If so (and removing the fact that this is immigration for a second), doesn't that scare anyone that a President, with a unilateral stroke of a pen, can put any policy in place that they see fit and it cannot be overturned?

stopwastingmymoney

(2,043 posts)
6. The legal reasoning on this one
Fri May 17, 2019, 09:14 PM
May 2019

I’m paraphrasing from memory but, what judges have said is that once you bestow rights on someone, in exchange for them coming out of the shadows, you have essentially entered into a contract with that person. The DACA participants have performed their end of the contract by registering, so the govt can’t just back out of its end of the deal.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump's Termination of DA...