House passes bill to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity
Source: Washington Post
The House passed legislation Friday to amend the decades-old Civil Rights Act to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Despite a sea change in the past decade in public opinion regarding gay rights and the legalization of same-sex marriage nationally, 30 states have no laws protecting people from being fired, denied housing or harassed for their sexuality or gender identity. The bill would prohibit such discrimination in education, jury duty and federal financing along with housing and employment.
The ability to have a job, to receive medical care or to rent a home should not depend on who someone is, Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said during House debate. We cannot accept the situation where anyone in this country can get married on Sunday and legally fired on Monday because of who they love. Rep. David N. Cicilline (D-R.I.) was chief sponsor of the measure to amend the 1964 law, calling it a life-saving bill that addresses some of the fundamental inequality.
As Democrats applauded, the bill passed 236-to-173, with eight Republicans breaking ranks and joining all Democrats in backing the measure. It is unlikely to get a vote in the Republican-led Senate, and the White House has signaled that President Trump would veto the measure if it ever reached his desk.
Several Republicans spoke in opposition to the legislation, arguing that it violates religious freedom and nullifies womens rights, particularly in the area of competitive sports. It is bad for freedom to force small business owners all across this country to provide services or products to the public that may violate their deeply held faith-based convictions, said Rep. Ross Spano (R-Fla). Again, allowing the state to essentially impose from above top down its own moral codes and rules in place of those of the individual.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/house-passes-bill-to-ban-discrimination-based-on-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity/2019/05/17/aed18a16-78a3-11e9-b3f5-5673edf2d127_story.html
Original article and headline -
By Washington Post Staff
May 17 at 12:15 PM
The bill, which passed largely along party lines, would protect people from being fired, denied housing or harassed for their sexuality or gender identity. President Trump has signaled his opposition to the bill, which is unlikely to get a vote in the Republican-led Senate.
This is a developing story. It will be updated.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2019/05/17/house-passes-bill-to-ban-discrimination-based-on-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity-vote-unlikely-in-gop-led-senate/?utm_term=.790bdb1f18d4&wpisrc=al_politics__alert-politics&wpmk=1
Raven123
(4,956 posts)These are what candidates for the House, Senate and Pres can run on.
brooklynite
(95,076 posts)It's valuable legislation, and our candidates obviously shouldn't oppose it, but it's not likely a driving issue in the 2020 Election. The primary issues will be pocket book economics, possibly with reproductive rights as a sidebar. If the LGBTQ population doesn't know where Republicans and Democrats stand at this point, there's a bigger problem.
Raven123
(4,956 posts)Build a vision through legislative votes.
Archae
(46,379 posts)Since *HE* doesn't like it.
BigmanPigman
(51,675 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)for a major slap in the face over all the Legislation that has passed the House.
Talk about getting the Rethugs on Record as to their Votes in Congress for Ammunition and Campaign Talking Points. Hey,the Lady has these suckers nailed to the barn door.
Oh,for those of us who know Mitch McConnell will not let these Bill's see the light of day in the Senate,well that is about to backfire on Mitchy next year. More Campaign Fodder.
BTW,notice Obama just announced a in Fund to help elect Democrat's in 2020. This will piss off Mitch and Ponzi Don big time.
Chin music
(23,002 posts)When do we get started on the impeachment?
Cartaphelius
(868 posts)ALL citizens of America are guaranteed these basic rights at birth.
Why is there need for laws for blacks, muslims, women, LBGT and every other
possible groups EXCEPT whites?
Guess I'll never understand ignoring a constitutional right for a lame ass law that
any idiot can ignore and get away with (Trump, Barr, the right en masse. christians,
Alabama, Louisiana, etc., etc..)
NYC Liberal
(20,140 posts)This guy is probably super anti-choice.
BumRushDaShow
(130,149 posts)"Cognitive dissonance".