Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(130,149 posts)
Fri May 17, 2019, 12:18 PM May 2019

House passes bill to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity

Source: Washington Post



The House passed legislation Friday to amend the decades-old Civil Rights Act to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Despite a sea change in the past decade in public opinion regarding gay rights and the legalization of same-sex marriage nationally, 30 states have no laws protecting people from being fired, denied housing or harassed for their sexuality or gender identity. The bill would prohibit such discrimination in education, jury duty and federal financing along with housing and employment.

“The ability to have a job, to receive medical care or to rent a home should not depend on who someone is,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said during House debate. “We cannot accept the situation where anyone in this country can get married on Sunday and legally fired on Monday because of who they love.” Rep. David N. Cicilline (D-R.I.) was chief sponsor of the measure to amend the 1964 law, calling it “a life-saving bill that addresses some of the fundamental inequality.”

As Democrats applauded, the bill passed 236-to-173, with eight Republicans breaking ranks and joining all Democrats in backing the measure. It is unlikely to get a vote in the Republican-led Senate, and the White House has signaled that President Trump would veto the measure if it ever reached his desk.

Several Republicans spoke in opposition to the legislation, arguing that it violates religious freedom and nullifies women’s rights, particularly in the area of competitive sports. “It is bad for freedom to force small business owners all across this country to provide services or products to the public that may violate their deeply held faith-based convictions,” said Rep. Ross Spano (R-Fla). “Again, allowing the state to essentially impose from above top down its own moral codes and rules in place of those of the individual.”

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/house-passes-bill-to-ban-discrimination-based-on-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity/2019/05/17/aed18a16-78a3-11e9-b3f5-5673edf2d127_story.html



Original article and headline -

House passes bill to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity; vote unlikely in GOP-led Senate

By Washington Post Staff
May 17 at 12:15 PM

The bill, which passed largely along party lines, would protect people from being fired, denied housing or harassed for their sexuality or gender identity. President Trump has signaled his opposition to the bill, which is unlikely to get a vote in the Republican-led Senate.

This is a developing story. It will be updated.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2019/05/17/house-passes-bill-to-ban-discrimination-based-on-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity-vote-unlikely-in-gop-led-senate/?utm_term=.790bdb1f18d4&wpisrc=al_politics__alert-politics&wpmk=1
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House passes bill to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity (Original Post) BumRushDaShow May 2019 OP
I think the Dem platform is taking shape Raven123 May 2019 #1
No they shouldn't brooklynite May 2019 #9
Let me clarify. I mean to refer to all passed legislation by the House Raven123 May 2019 #10
Mitch the Bitch will never let it go anywhere... Archae May 2019 #2
I hate that muther as much as the fucking moron. BigmanPigman May 2019 #11
Miss Nacey is setting the Republicans up Wellstone ruled May 2019 #3
Agreed. Impeachment votes in the Senate, can also be used against them. Chin music May 2019 #5
But according to the Constitution Cartaphelius May 2019 #4
Republicans have zero sense of irony: NYC Liberal May 2019 #6
It's called BumRushDaShow May 2019 #7
Rep. Pelosi: This is not about tolerance, this is about respect. demmiblue May 2019 #8
Religious freedom to discriminate against who ever they feel like ... and spew hate. YOHABLO May 2019 #12

Raven123

(4,956 posts)
1. I think the Dem platform is taking shape
Fri May 17, 2019, 12:28 PM
May 2019

These are what candidates for the House, Senate and Pres can run on.

brooklynite

(95,076 posts)
9. No they shouldn't
Fri May 17, 2019, 01:38 PM
May 2019

It's valuable legislation, and our candidates obviously shouldn't oppose it, but it's not likely a driving issue in the 2020 Election. The primary issues will be pocket book economics, possibly with reproductive rights as a sidebar. If the LGBTQ population doesn't know where Republicans and Democrats stand at this point, there's a bigger problem.

Raven123

(4,956 posts)
10. Let me clarify. I mean to refer to all passed legislation by the House
Fri May 17, 2019, 01:45 PM
May 2019

Build a vision through legislative votes.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
3. Miss Nacey is setting the Republicans up
Fri May 17, 2019, 12:30 PM
May 2019

for a major slap in the face over all the Legislation that has passed the House.

Talk about getting the Rethugs on Record as to their Votes in Congress for Ammunition and Campaign Talking Points. Hey,the Lady has these suckers nailed to the barn door.

Oh,for those of us who know Mitch McConnell will not let these Bill's see the light of day in the Senate,well that is about to backfire on Mitchy next year. More Campaign Fodder.

BTW,notice Obama just announced a in Fund to help elect Democrat's in 2020. This will piss off Mitch and Ponzi Don big time.

Chin music

(23,002 posts)
5. Agreed. Impeachment votes in the Senate, can also be used against them.
Fri May 17, 2019, 12:33 PM
May 2019

When do we get started on the impeachment?

 

Cartaphelius

(868 posts)
4. But according to the Constitution
Fri May 17, 2019, 12:31 PM
May 2019

ALL citizens of America are guaranteed these basic rights at birth.

Why is there need for laws for blacks, muslims, women, LBGT and every other
possible groups EXCEPT whites?

Guess I'll never understand ignoring a constitutional right for a lame ass law that
any idiot can ignore and get away with (Trump, Barr, the right en masse. christians,
Alabama, Louisiana, etc., etc..)

NYC Liberal

(20,140 posts)
6. Republicans have zero sense of irony:
Fri May 17, 2019, 12:35 PM
May 2019
Again, allowing the state to essentially impose from above top down its own moral codes and rules in place of those of the individual


This guy is probably super anti-choice.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House passes bill to ban ...