Judge rules against Trump in lawsuit to block Democrats' subpoena for financial records
Source: CNBC
A federal judge ruled against President Donald Trump on Monday in a lawsuit to block a subpoena from House Democrats for information about his finances....
In a hearing in May, the presidents lawyers argued that the Democrats actions fell far afield of Congress legitimate oversight functions as a legislative body. But Judge Amit Mehta questioned that argument, suggesting in the hearing that many historic congressional investigations including the Watergate probe might be considered invalid by the standard Trumps lawyers were asserting.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/20/judge-rules-against-trump-in-lawsuit-to-block-democrats-subpoena-for-financial-records.html
Its going to get hairy fast....
yaesu
(8,020 posts)Last edited Mon May 20, 2019, 06:39 PM - Edit history (1)
rurallib
(62,508 posts)Ligyron
(7,657 posts)Accounting firm has 7 days before it must produce those records and they will.
DrToast
(6,414 posts)But Im not a lawyer. Thank god.
Ligyron
(7,657 posts)They better hurry and demonstrate why an appeal is necessary or is likely to prevail or that producing these records would cause serious harm to the parties involved?
I think the judge addressed and kinda squelched the successful appeal route.
SunSeeker
(51,898 posts)What's frustrating is that SCOTUS in Bush v. Gore decided counting votes in Florida amounted to irreparable harm warranting an injunction.
onenote
(42,911 posts)and thus, that factor favored the grant of a stay. However, there are three other factors that are considered when deciding whether to stay a decision pending appeal and all three (likelihood of success on the merits, balance of equities and public interest) all counseled against granting a stay.
That being said, it is not outside the realm of possibility that an appeals court might give more weight to the irreparable harm factor and grant a stay pending appeal, particularly if the appeal is scheduled to be briefed and argued on an expedited basis.
aggiesal
(8,971 posts)will try to send it to SCOTUS, believing that his seated majority will side with him.
Nitram
(23,047 posts)they'll get him in the end. and he will no longer have Executive Priveledge, etc. to protect him.
Response to ashredux (Original post)
Drew Christ Spam deleted by MIR Team
Linda Ed
(493 posts)If you think the Trump-Russia story is over, you havent been paying attention. Michael Flynn is & was perhaps the primary figure in this whole ballgame. Were in the early innings still.
This is a turning point in history. The continuance of this democratic republic is under enormous threat. Autocracy hates democracy. We need all hands on deck to resist peacefully. The alternative is unthinkable.
This is a turning point in history. The continuance of this democratic republic is under enormous threat. Autocracy hates democracy. We need all hands on deck to resist peacefully. The alternative is unthinkable.
Ligyron
(7,657 posts)Because you're right, this IS the most perilous time in my lifetime and I'm old.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.