A man set himself on fire outside Israeli Embassy in D.C., now in critical condition
Source: NPR
NATIONAL
A man set himself on fire outside Israeli Embassy in D.C., now in critical condition
UPDATED FEBRUARY 25, 20246:53 PM ET
Juliana Kim
Multiple law enforcement agencies arrived at the Israeli Embassy on Sunday afternoon after a man set himself on fire infront of the building.
Andrew Leyden
A man is in critical condition after setting himself on fire in front of the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C., on Sunday afternoon, according to multiple law enforcement agencies.
The U.S. Secret Service said it was responding to reports of an individual experiencing a possible medical or mental health emergency. Local police arrived around 1 p.m. ET.
The fire has since been extinguished. The Israeli Embassy in D.C. said none of its staff were injured.
Vito Maggiolo, a spokesperson for D.C. Fire and EMS, said the man has been transported to the hospital, where he has "critical life threatening injuries."
{snip}
Read more: https://www.npr.org/2024/02/25/1233810136/fire-man-israeli-embassy-washington
mpcamb
(2,872 posts)We fought while killing people in their own country and extracted huge damage upon ourselves.
JustAnotherGen
(31,856 posts)Pretty obvious that he's having both if he sets himself on fire.
SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)His family must be devastated.
TeamProg
(6,193 posts)1st LP cover
Johnny2X2X
(19,095 posts)Wow.
More_Cowbell
(2,191 posts)By the woman who's been in contact with his family
https://x.com/taliaotg/status/1761956302543016071?s=20
IronLionZion
(45,494 posts)otherwise it's excruciating pain
IronLionZion
(45,494 posts)SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)It didn't stop the Vietnam War, it didn't free Tibet, and it didn't make life better for Tunisian fruit vendors.
JustAnotherGen
(31,856 posts)limbicnuminousity
(1,404 posts)Didn't change anything, right? Mother Theresa too. What idiots.
Unless the act itself is meant to express something like, I dunno, moral outrage and a refusal to accept the status quo?
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,570 posts)limbicnuminousity
(1,404 posts)They didn't achieve world peace, hence whatever they did was pointless. Right? That was the implication I was referring to. Not sorry if you have a problem with that.
Maybe this man was disturbed as some have suggested. Maybe he was a Buddhist pursuing what he perceived to be the only morally acceptable course of action.
LeftInTX
(25,496 posts)He organized strikes, peaceful resistance. He also had support. Although he appeared as a "coolie", (to the embarrassment of Nehru and other members of All India Congress Committee), he wasn't alone. He had mainstream support. He also gained support of Indian's peasants.
Even without Gandhi, the odds are that the British would have left India. The All India Congress was often in negotiations with the British. The relationship between the British and India was much different than the relationship between Israel and Palestinians.
I noticed you also called him a pedophile and another stuff...So what was the purpose of that? Yeah, yeah, it was India and he married when he was 14 and his wife was 13. He was rumored to have been with teen girls and was obsessed with celibacy and temptation, but that was irrelevant to what he did. Of course he was a misogynist. He was born in 1869. He was from a culture of arranged marriages. He wasn't out to create any "sexual liberation movement or feminist movement". His purpose anti-colonialism. My grandfather and great grandfather were also the same way. They were a product of their times, culture and arranged marriages. Many Palestinian men have more than one wife. Some have three or four. So, I'm pretty sure they're misogynists too. Marriages are also arranged in Gaza.
He didn't set himself on fire.
Stuckinthebush
(10,847 posts)And yes, self immolation has never been as effective a tool as doing the long, hard work of cultural change.
limbicnuminousity
(1,404 posts)Gandhi is a tangent. Mother Theresa is a tangent. I mentioned them in passing and instead of addressing the subject of self-immolation the response I received chose to address the relative merits of Mother Theresa's contribution on this mortal coil. I personally DGIAF about either of them within the context of this thread. I suspect they were imperfect people struggling to do some good in the world. I have zero interest in debating whether or not they were good people.
JI7
(89,260 posts)limbicnuminousity
(1,404 posts)They're both cultural reference points, people that Westerners tend to associate with pacifism and service.
Whatever, it's irrelevant. The West has declined to the point that we're incapable of even considering the possibility that a person might actually act in accordance with their beliefs.
JI7
(89,260 posts)Polybius
(15,465 posts)He slept in the same bed naked with his nude grand-nieces when they were 18/19 to test himself. That's just nuts.
ExciteBike66
(2,370 posts)That said, it would certainly be illegal under our laws. I can't say if it was under Indian law.
LeftInTX
(25,496 posts)I really don't know the story. It seems muddled. Who knows what the age of consent in British India was back then? It was British, but they allowed very young child marriage, so who knows? I'm sure the Brits had morality police/vice units but would they really want to arrest him when they allowed alot of other stuff?
Polybius
(15,465 posts)I don't think it would be illegal here either since they weren't minors.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,423 posts)Did I miss that?
limbicnuminousity
(1,404 posts)This is getting repetitive.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,386 posts)LeftInTX
(25,496 posts)Doesn't appear to have been active in protest groups.
Worked in cyber-security for the USAF.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13126695/Airforce-Aaron-Bushnell-setting-fire-DC-Israeli-Embassy.html
Happy Hoosier
(7,367 posts)Just tragic. It's insane how some folks will throw away their life for nothing.
LeftInTX
(25,496 posts)Better than shooting up a bunch of kids first.
Turbineguy
(37,361 posts)None
snowybirdie
(5,232 posts)Died today. A wasted life
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,570 posts)Airman dies after setting himself on fire outside Israeli Embassy in D.C.
By Emily Davies, Peter Hermann, Dan Lamothe and Hannah Allam
Updated February 26, 2024 at 1:48 p.m. EST | Published February 26, 2024 at 8:10 a.m. EST
Flags and posters of kidnapped people are seen outside of the Israeli Embassy, Monday, Feb. 26, 2024, in Washington. An active-duty member of the U.S. Air Force has died after he set himself ablaze outside the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C., while declaring that he will no longer be complicit in genocide. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)
An active-duty airman who set himself on fire outside the Israeli Embassy on Sunday to protest U.S. support for Israels war in Gaza has died, a D.C. police spokesman said Monday morning.
The spokesman, Paris Lewbel, confirmed that the man was pronounced dead at a hospital Sunday night. He has been identified as 25-year-old Aaron Bushnell of San Antonio.
{snip}
Razzan Nakhlawi contributed to this report.
Seeking Serenity
(2,840 posts)A soldier who advocated for a free Palestine decided to protest his government's participation in what he viewed is a genocide in a most dramatic and lethal way.
But that's not legitimate protest. He just had mental illness.
EX500rider
(10,849 posts)Apparently not enough to not join the military or not resign up.
orangecrush
(19,597 posts)Was stationed in DC in 1968, (Old Guard).
We had the 6 o'clock DC news on and they showed the guy who immolated himself on the Pentagon steps.
My brother started shaking and left the room.
He was fresh home from Nam.
I guess he had seen more than his share of people burned alive.
(He was combat infantry.)